Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 

ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

12 Sep 2011, 9:45 pm

Should the advocacy of the very high functioning who concerns like isolation not apply to be separated from those whom otherwise it does apply to. To what extend does another person not liking a type of awareness should hinder the advocacy for which it applies to? I propose other then a shared diagnoses label some people simply have different needs in awareness and that should be respected. The only binding concept is the word "autism". Autism is about social exclusion and disabilities relevant to inclusion. How do we resolve this potential matter without others desires to fit into autism as an identity be offended where applicable?


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com


vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

13 Sep 2011, 5:00 am

ommm ook,explain


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

13 Sep 2011, 8:09 am

I did not understand that. Please clarify.



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

13 Sep 2011, 9:21 am

what is the point of the post


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined