How do you feel about the word ret*d?
No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.
Yes this fair enough... the r-word is more loaded (as you say) but by the same token I'm not aware of anyone who would consider being called autistic as anything but an insult. It's just a matter of degrees...
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,476
Location: Long Island, New York
No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.
Yes this fair enough... the r-word is more loaded (as you say) but by the same token I'm not aware of anyone who would consider being called autistic as anything but an insult. It's just a matter of degrees...
Well now you know one. My perception would depend heavily on the circumstances.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.
Yes this fair enough... the r-word is more loaded (as you say) but by the same token I'm not aware of anyone who would consider being called autistic as anything but an insult. It's just a matter of degrees...
Well now you know one. My perception would depend heavily on the circumstances.
oops! clarification - NT perception
Language always provides non-literal, abstract ways to precisely express one's ideas. If we politicize a word, its meaning morphs. "ret*d" changed from a general adjective to talk about something that was moving, but at a slower speed, to label and segregate human cognition, to a weapon. When we PC a word, it increases its power as a weapon.
The most successful campaigns I am aware of to disarm weaponized vocabulary is the group affected embraces the word: queer (odd), first a general word, then a pejorative, then replaced with gay, now the umbrella term for talking about sexual diversity in a civil manner. "Black" was embraced because segment of humans, although we are all shades of brown, denigrated on the abstract feature.
It was used, like gay, to replace a word that is still such a powerful weapon of hate, that if I wrote it, I would be sanctioned I pray for the day when this "old" "white" "lady" (all politicized words) can talk about my friends and family with "n-word" and no one thinks its bad because no one thinks badly of people stereotyped by it, and the pain caused by this weapon has healed.
But as long as the world is inhabited by humans, we will have haters. As long as we have haters, words will be weaponized. All we can do is embrace them proudly.
Correct. It is time the autistic community takes ownership of the word "autistic" rather than leaving it in the hands of so-called "autism professionals". You might enjoy the following slides from a talk I did in January on a related topic https://coininco.files.wordpress.com/20 ... bourne.pdf.
But that's silly. Why should we change the meaning of existing words. That's like going through the dictionary and scoring out words we don't like.
Every generation changes the vocabulary. And the older generation has been complaining about it for thousands years or so. Language is very fluid.
This is correct. Words are often used intentionally to trigger specific emotions. It is a common pattern for those who are oppressed or who have less power to jointly redefine the semantics of specific words. This allows insults to be turned into approval and innocent words to be turned into insults. No one owns a language, even if institutions like the Académie française sometimes pretend that they own a language.
By the way, there is a fascinating book on the history of the Oxford English Dictionary titled "The Surgeon of Crowthorne : A Tale of Murder, Madness and the Oxford English Dictionary" by Simon Winchester.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,476
Location: Long Island, New York
Language always provides non-literal, abstract ways to precisely express one's ideas. If we politicize a word, its meaning morphs. "ret*d" changed from a general adjective to talk about something that was moving, but at a slower speed, to label and segregate human cognition, to a weapon. When we PC a word, it increases its power as a weapon.
The most successful campaigns I am aware of to disarm weaponized vocabulary is the group affected embraces the word: queer (odd), first a general word, then a pejorative, then replaced with gay, now the umbrella term for talking about sexual diversity in a civil manner. "Black" was embraced because segment of humans, although we are all shades of brown, denigrated on the abstract feature.
It was used, like gay, to replace a word that is still such a powerful weapon of hate, that if I wrote it, I would be sanctioned I pray for the day when this "old" "white" "lady" (all politicized words) can talk about my friends and family with "n-word" and no one thinks its bad because no one thinks badly of people stereotyped by it, and the pain caused by this weapon has healed.
But as long as the world is inhabited by humans, we will have haters. As long as we have haters, words will be weaponized. All we can do is embrace them proudly.
Correct. It is time the autistic community takes ownership of the word "autistic" rather than leaving it in the hands of so-called "autism professionals". You might enjoy the following slides from a talk I did in January on a related topic https://coininco.files.wordpress.com/20 ... bourne.pdf.
This is called Reappropriation. If you have heard the expression "let your freak flag fly" that came about because in the '60's hippes were called pejoratively freaks by mainstream America. The hippies reappropriated it even though nobody really called it that back then. Now the expression has morphed into pride in difference of many kinds.
Aspie was an attempt to do that for Aspergers. That's all. It was not an attempt to hate NT's, disassociate from severe autistics, excuse rude behavoir etc. But many in our community have managed to turn it into those negatives. If we hate ourselves, we will never get respect, acceptence, tolerance in any meaningful way.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
According to the functionalism school of psychology, intelligence is an evolutionary adaptation whereby higher intelligence is mean't to help us survive living in the jungle and keeping out of harm's way.
In the future the reliance on human intelligence is (ironically) going to be unnecessary as AI units (mobile and stationary) will think for us. AI will eventually become > human intelligence and when that happens the need for smart humans become redundant.
It has a defined meaning nobody really uses.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
The R word is firmly rooted in the same ignorance and bigotry which gave us the N word, absolutely no difference at all. Some of the language which is common place in the US would be considered totally unacceptable and discriminatory in the UK. The horribly named and totally inaccurate TEACHH is one example. No one would ever dream of using the word handicap in this country, its just plain nasty. Society is our disabler not our alleged impairments. The term Handicap comes from the time when some people who could not work had to beg "hand in cap' the cap was where the rich could donate their penny.
_________________
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder (Level 1)
AQ: 42
RAADS-R: 160
BBC: Radio 4
And yet "high functioning" WP members use the r word often (not mentioning names)
DevilInPgh
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
Location: Washington, DC
That would seem to explain all these demands.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
Jesus Sperg
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 20 Jul 2017
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Posts: 50
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Need Help With a Word |
22 Feb 2024, 9:57 pm |
Neurotypical word usage and semantics a.k.a. NO MORE ISMS |
06 Mar 2024, 8:42 am |
I feel embarrassed
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
11 Apr 2024, 2:36 am |
Should I feel bad for having few friends |
Today, 12:43 pm |