Page 7 of 26 [ 414 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 26  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,254
Location: Long Island, New York

27 Feb 2017, 3:57 am

Awiddershinlife wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
ret*d means slow. ret*d has pretty much always been a pejorative. If people want to reappropriate that word into something positive I would be for that effort.



But that's silly. Why should we change the meaning of existing words. That's like going through the dictionary and scoring out words we don't like.


Every generation changes the vocabulary. And the older generation has been complaining about it for thousands years or so. Language is very fluid.


I am glad autistic is used to describe a wider variety of people these days. i am glad everybody is not using it as a complete negative anymore.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness

27 Feb 2017, 10:26 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:

I am glad autistic is used to describe a wider variety of people these days. i am glad everybody is not using it as a complete negative anymore.


I am still careful about where I talk about it, although where I work now there seems to be more than the usual who I suspect might be. It makes the job more fun and less stressful.


_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,150

28 Feb 2017, 12:26 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
I am glad autistic is used to describe a wider variety of people these days. i am glad everybody is not using it as a complete negative anymore.


I'm afraid this might be becoming the case within the autistic community but among NTs calling somebody autistic is perceived as equivalent to calling them the r word

The two are often used synonymously on social media and I have "unfriended" people because they posted both words as slurs in a unrefined attempt at humor



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,254
Location: Long Island, New York

28 Feb 2017, 4:17 am

cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
I am glad autistic is used to describe a wider variety of people these days. i am glad everybody is not using it as a complete negative anymore.


I'm afraid this might be becoming the case within the autistic community but among NTs calling somebody autistic is perceived as equivalent to calling them the r word

The two are often used synonymously on social media and I have "unfriended" people because they posted both words as slurs in a unrefined attempt at humor


It is used to describe a wider variety of people but we got a very long way to go. The three basic streotypes are ret*d, Rain Man, and Sheldon. But that does not change how far it has come during my lifetime.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,150

01 Mar 2017, 1:57 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
I am glad autistic is used to describe a wider variety of people these days. i am glad everybody is not using it as a complete negative anymore.


I'm afraid this might be becoming the case within the autistic community but among NTs calling somebody autistic is perceived as equivalent to calling them the r word

The two are often used synonymously on social media and I have "unfriended" people because they posted both words as slurs in a unrefined attempt at humor


It is used to describe a wider variety of people but we got a very long way to go. The three basic streotypes are ret*d, Rain Man, and Sheldon. But that does not change how far it has come during my lifetime.

Most young people have never heard of "Rainman" and "Sheldon" isn't going to elicit a reaction since people who watch Big Bang theory actually think the character is funny while for those who don't watch the program it doesn't register...

that just leaves the r-word which has now become intergenerational and easily recognisable as a universal slur



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,254
Location: Long Island, New York

01 Mar 2017, 3:27 am

cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
I am glad autistic is used to describe a wider variety of people these days. i am glad everybody is not using it as a complete negative anymore.


I'm afraid this might be becoming the case within the autistic community but among NTs calling somebody autistic is perceived as equivalent to calling them the r word

The two are often used synonymously on social media and I have "unfriended" people because they posted both words as slurs in a unrefined attempt at humor


It is used to describe a wider variety of people but we got a very long way to go. The three basic streotypes are ret*d, Rain Man, and Sheldon. But that does not change how far it has come during my lifetime.

Most young people have never heard of "Rainman" and "Sheldon" isn't going to elicit a reaction since people who watch Big Bang theory actually think the character is funny while for those who don't watch the program it doesn't register...

that just leaves the r-word which has now become intergenerational and easily recognisable as a universal slur


It does not matter who has seen Rain Man or watches The Big Bang Theory, those Autism stereotypes have permeated the culture. If you say you are on the spectrum people judge you as in need of 24/7 maintenence or a socially ackward genius who should just try harder to be normal. There is little if any reconition that most autistics fall somewhere inbetween. "Moderate" or "Level 2" autism does that even get diagnosed?

As far as Sheldon it is my impression most are laughing at him, not with him, similar to a clown.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Dione
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 194
Location: A house in a galaxy far far away

01 Mar 2017, 3:57 am

I freaking hate it. It was used on me long before my diagnosis because my maiden name rhymed with it; even some of my adult cousins used it on me. I also have several special needs relatives and a cousin working on her degree to work with special needs high school students, which has only made me that much more vehement about the disuse of the word.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,150

01 Mar 2017, 5:23 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
It does not matter who has seen Rain Man or watches The Big Bang Theory, those Autism stereotypes have permeated the culture. If you say you are on the spectrum people judge you as in need of 24/7 maintenence or a socially ackward genius who should just try harder to be normal. There is little if any reconition that most autistics fall somewhere inbetween. "Moderate" or "Level 2" autism does that even get diagnosed?

As far as Sheldon it is my impression most are laughing at him, not with him, similar to a clown.


I think you are choosing to see autism mostly through your own eyes.

Movies are just one source, people pick up stereotypes of autism from TV (news or documentaries), books and magazines rather than just movies. Draasima's research published in the Royal Society of Philosophical Transactions https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677582/
has found there has been a proliferation of stereotypes of autism that vary across a wide range of misconceptions perpetuated by the mass media.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,254
Location: Long Island, New York

01 Mar 2017, 10:12 am

There are a large variety of stereotypes. As I wrote those are from what I see at least here the three I listed are most "popular" or form a basis for or are a part of the others.

Back to the topic of the thread the pejoritive "ret*d" is much more "popular" then any one autism stereotype because people apply it to a lot more then autism. Autistic is replacing "ret*d" in part because it is becoming politically incorrect to use "ret*d" in a number of circles.

No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,150

02 Mar 2017, 2:28 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Back to the topic of the thread the pejoritive "ret*d" is much more "popular" then any one autism stereotype because people apply it to a lot more then autism. Autistic is replacing "ret*d" in part because it is becoming politically incorrect to use "ret*d" in a number of circles.

No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.

Yes this fair enough... the r-word is more loaded (as you say) but by the same token I'm not aware of anyone who would consider being called autistic as anything but an insult. It's just a matter of degrees...



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,254
Location: Long Island, New York

02 Mar 2017, 2:48 am

cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Back to the topic of the thread the pejoritive "ret*d" is much more "popular" then any one autism stereotype because people apply it to a lot more then autism. Autistic is replacing "ret*d" in part because it is becoming politically incorrect to use "ret*d" in a number of circles.

No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.

Yes this fair enough... the r-word is more loaded (as you say) but by the same token I'm not aware of anyone who would consider being called autistic as anything but an insult. It's just a matter of degrees...


Well now you know one. My perception would depend heavily on the circumstances.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,150

02 Mar 2017, 3:15 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Back to the topic of the thread the pejoritive "ret*d" is much more "popular" then any one autism stereotype because people apply it to a lot more then autism. Autistic is replacing "ret*d" in part because it is becoming politically incorrect to use "ret*d" in a number of circles.

No matter which stereotype is most popular at the moment, the problem is what Autism is to a most autistics is mostly unknown.

Yes this fair enough... the r-word is more loaded (as you say) but by the same token I'm not aware of anyone who would consider being called autistic as anything but an insult. It's just a matter of degrees...


Well now you know one. My perception would depend heavily on the circumstances.

oops! clarification - NT perception



jbw
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2013
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 421

02 Mar 2017, 6:30 am

Awiddershinlife wrote:
It is a word that means slow.

Language always provides non-literal, abstract ways to precisely express one's ideas. If we politicize a word, its meaning morphs. "ret*d" changed from a general adjective to talk about something that was moving, but at a slower speed, to label and segregate human cognition, to a weapon. When we PC a word, it increases its power as a weapon.

The most successful campaigns I am aware of to disarm weaponized vocabulary is the group affected embraces the word: queer (odd), first a general word, then a pejorative, then replaced with gay, now the umbrella term for talking about sexual diversity in a civil manner. "Black" was embraced because segment of humans, although we are all shades of brown, denigrated on the abstract feature.

It was used, like gay, to replace a word that is still such a powerful weapon of hate, that if I wrote it, I would be sanctioned 8O I pray for the day when this "old" "white" "lady" (all politicized words) can talk about my friends and family with "n-word" and no one thinks its bad because no one thinks badly of people stereotyped by it, and the pain caused by this weapon has healed.

But as long as the world is inhabited by humans, we will have haters. As long as we have haters, words will be weaponized. All we can do is embrace them proudly.

Correct. It is time the autistic community takes ownership of the word "autistic" rather than leaving it in the hands of so-called "autism professionals". You might enjoy the following slides from a talk I did in January on a related topic https://coininco.files.wordpress.com/20 ... bourne.pdf.



jbw
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2013
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 421

02 Mar 2017, 6:51 am

Awiddershinlife wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
ret*d means slow. ret*d has pretty much always been a pejorative. If people want to reappropriate that word into something positive I would be for that effort.



But that's silly. Why should we change the meaning of existing words. That's like going through the dictionary and scoring out words we don't like.


Every generation changes the vocabulary. And the older generation has been complaining about it for thousands years or so. Language is very fluid.

This is correct. Words are often used intentionally to trigger specific emotions. It is a common pattern for those who are oppressed or who have less power to jointly redefine the semantics of specific words. This allows insults to be turned into approval and innocent words to be turned into insults. No one owns a language, even if institutions like the Académie française sometimes pretend that they own a language.

By the way, there is a fascinating book on the history of the Oxford English Dictionary titled "The Surgeon of Crowthorne : A Tale of Murder, Madness and the Oxford English Dictionary" by Simon Winchester.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,254
Location: Long Island, New York

02 Mar 2017, 9:52 am

jbw wrote:
Awiddershinlife wrote:
It is a word that means slow.

Language always provides non-literal, abstract ways to precisely express one's ideas. If we politicize a word, its meaning morphs. "ret*d" changed from a general adjective to talk about something that was moving, but at a slower speed, to label and segregate human cognition, to a weapon. When we PC a word, it increases its power as a weapon.

The most successful campaigns I am aware of to disarm weaponized vocabulary is the group affected embraces the word: queer (odd), first a general word, then a pejorative, then replaced with gay, now the umbrella term for talking about sexual diversity in a civil manner. "Black" was embraced because segment of humans, although we are all shades of brown, denigrated on the abstract feature.

It was used, like gay, to replace a word that is still such a powerful weapon of hate, that if I wrote it, I would be sanctioned 8O I pray for the day when this "old" "white" "lady" (all politicized words) can talk about my friends and family with "n-word" and no one thinks its bad because no one thinks badly of people stereotyped by it, and the pain caused by this weapon has healed.

But as long as the world is inhabited by humans, we will have haters. As long as we have haters, words will be weaponized. All we can do is embrace them proudly.

Correct. It is time the autistic community takes ownership of the word "autistic" rather than leaving it in the hands of so-called "autism professionals". You might enjoy the following slides from a talk I did in January on a related topic https://coininco.files.wordpress.com/20 ... bourne.pdf.


This is called Reappropriation. If you have heard the expression "let your freak flag fly" that came about because in the '60's hippes were called pejoratively freaks by mainstream America. The hippies reappropriated it even though nobody really called it that back then. Now the expression has morphed into pride in difference of many kinds.

Aspie was an attempt to do that for Aspergers. That's all. It was not an attempt to hate NT's, disassociate from severe autistics, excuse rude behavoir etc. But many in our community have managed to turn it into those negatives. If we hate ourselves, we will never get respect, acceptence, tolerance in any meaningful way.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


248RPA
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,021
Location: beyond the Wall

03 Mar 2017, 9:18 pm

If society wasn't so obssessed with intelligence, ret*d probably wouldn't be a problem word.


_________________
Life ... that's what leaves the mess. Mad people everywhere.