Can people choose to be gay like they can choose ice cream f

Post Reply New Topic

As for gays reproducing, author William Burroughs who was a gay man had been in a long term relationship with a woman named Joan Volmer Burroughs despite his sexuality, with whom he had a son with.

Like almost everything else in life it is a spectrum of innate propensities and potential causal factors COMING together to make FULL sexuality what it is in any unique individual.

So in other words.. sometimes it is a choice like choosing ICE CREAM and sometimes IT IS NOT.

BUT ANYWAY, Kinsey's extensive research is STILL the best 'we' have in understanding the full spectrum of human sexual orientations and sexual activity with WHATEVER GENDER THEY SO DESIRE.

http://www.queerbychoice.com/dubay_homosexuality.html

GAY IS just a concept of label like specific religions and traditions thereof to impose repression, oppression OF HUMAN SEXUAL ORIENTATION NATURE and subjugation through illusory fears to scare the propensity for same sex attraction OUT OF FOLKS.

IF CULTURE SAID it was AND IS 'A' OK, overall, there is no telling what the percentage of same sex sexual activities might be.

Yeah, it could even BE LIKE OUR CLOSEST PRIMATE COUSINS THE BONOBO.. WHO 'F' EVERY HAIRY Bonobo PRIMATE WITH OR WITHOUT TESTICLES THAT MOVES to resolve potential aggression and violence with THE OXYTOCIN NEUROHORMONE released during the 'COMING' OF SEX.. THAT BONDS PRIMATES together in body and mind balance FOR GREATER SOCIAL COOPERATION.

AND nah.. not just the BILL CLINTON DEFINITION OF SEX.. ALL OF THE STIMULATING ACTIVITIES THAT CAN LEAD TO CLIMAX.

This is much more complicated thaN SIMPLE CLASSICAL DARWINIAN EVOLUTION FOR REPRODUCTION.

SURVIVAL OF A SOCIAL ANIMAL MEANS SOCIAL COOPERATION, AND HOOKING UP IS THE 'BIG BALLED' all natural PRIMATE WAY OF GETTING HER OR HE DONE.

BUT Culture alone can convince women that cutting off their clitoris organ, used as pleasure organ only, IS AN EFFECTIVE CULTURAL PRACTICE OF GAINING greater self esteem, so in the world of human beings, 'STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES'..

TO PARAPHRASE and quote the fictional and non-fictional FOREST GUMP.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THAT

To me, at least, it is fascinating to watch some of the usual Anti-GOD folks here avoid the science of this when it comes to a topic that has personal emotional implications.

Good POTENTIAL lesson here, as to why there is so much disagreement among theists and atheists.

Emotions rule science (systemizing mind) and always will as that is human nature, no matter how scientific (systemizing) a person THINKS they are. Of course, unless there is serious brain damage as some studies show folks with this issue of brain damage cannot make decisions as simple as what color socks to wear when presented with more than one choice in the morning.

Emotions are VITAL TO THE COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BRAIN; no ifs and or BUTS about that.

Anyway, my point here is, there is nothing WRONG WITH protecting one's emotional health, even if it means avoiding the SCIENCE AT HAND.

WELL BACK to the science at hand, the study provided here, linked below, on real life primitive peoples makes it abundantly clear that environment plays a huge role in the genetic propensity towards homosexual behavior and HA! ha! even masturbation, as in the two linked primitive cultures when SOCIAL ROLES ARE CLEARLY DEFINED AND MATES OF THE OPPOSITE SEX ARE a GIVEN FOR THE WHOLE TRIBE, THERE ARE not even any words for homosexuals OR MASTURBATION.

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/12/where-masturbation-and-homosexuality-do-not-exist/265849/

BUT ON the other hand, SEX is considered in the cultural language OF THESE PRIMITIVE PEOPLES as PLEASURABLE 'night' WORK FOR MAKING BABIES AND THAT IS ALL.

SO CULTURE RULES AND PROPENSITIES OF HOMOSEXUALITY that in identical twin studies SCIENCE DOES SHOW A CORRELATION OF ABOUT 20 PERCENT, IS PART Of the GENETIC PROPENSITY Equation but far far from the total equation of human sexual orientations, WHEN the cultural ENVIRONMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE MIX.

BUT IN my opinion, GENETIC PROPENSITY IN even just 20 percent is ENOUGH TO FIGHT FOR HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS.

AND IN my opinion, no GENETIC PROPENSITY IN EVEN JUST 0 PERCENT of Twin studies, IF THAT WAS A FACT, is ENOUGH TO FIGHT FOR HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS, AS NOT EVERYONE is cut out for having children, AND THAT'S A FACT.

And Human Freedom of choice TO EXPLORE FULLEST human nature in enjoying life, including sexual related preferences, as long as they are consensual, legal, and harm no one, is WHAT A FREE COUNTRY IS ALL ABOUT, WHETHER folks want children or not.

PEOPLE who do not want children HAVING CHILDREN can LEAD TO Emotionally dead children, MENTAL DISORDERS, addiction, criminality, and many types of other disorders across the lifespan.

LOVING NURTURING PARENTS WHO WANT CHILDREN IS A NECESSITY of a healthy society.

Science now MOST DEFINITELY shows that children who are not nurtured properly in the first two years of life, FACE A LIFE OF POTENTIAL MISERY, AS WELL as the folks they come in contact with.

And A LACK OF NURTURING in the first two years of LIFE, IS A FACTOR per some forms of Autism, as science also now does show, however politically incorrect it may be to FACE THAT BIOLOGICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL FACT with emotions sweeping facts UNDER THE CARPET, OR in the CLOSET.