The problem with letting a woman know you care about looks
MONKEY
Veteran

Joined: 3 Jan 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,896
Location: Stoke, England (sometimes :P)
ValentineWiggin
Veteran

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw
You've a right to date whoever you choose, so it's not really an issue of "should".
I think it's more that some have a hard time keeping a straight face around complaints from people who could have dates or relationships,
but choose not to because of said standards.

_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."
You've a right to date whoever you choose, so it's not really an issue of "should".
I think it's more that some have a hard time keeping a straight face around complaints from people who could have dates or relationships,
but choose not to because of said standards.

Getting a relationship just to get a relationship isn't a big deal. If a man with impaired social skills want someone who's otherwise on his level, getting a relationship that actually lasts can be tricky, though.
@MXH
this isn't a productive conversation, I'm not going to engage with someone who refuses to have a respectful discussion
have a nice day
@MONKEY, you realize other male posters are trying really hard to prove there isn't sexism here, stop making their job harder with this nonsense
@Adam82, if you're such a catch, you'll get caught, don't worry so much about it or be down on yourself (omega man? what?)
You should have standards of course, but maybe you should move towards them being "a woman I find beautiful" instead of a detailed list of exacting qualifications. Like I usually like blond guys, but sometimes a brunette guy is attractive to me, going after him wouldn't be abandoning my standards. Or when I'm seeing girls, I usually like a curvy body type, but sometimes I see a more boyish figure that I find attractive on that person even though it's not usually my thing. If I was super vocal or belligerent about my "standards" I could lose my chance with other kinds of people who might surprise me.
One of the benefits of being the "pursuer" is you get to chose who you pursue. Women/other who are passive have to pick from what is offered to them.
@Kurgan, I don't understand your difficulty with the concept of chemistry. Have you never had a platonic friend who though attractive you had no feelings for? Or kissed someone and not felt anything?
I've had male friends who thought I was attractive (as evidenced by their testimony and penchant for dating girls who could be my body double) didn't want to date me because they didn't feel a romantic spark.
Women who want muscles or height are derided as being shallow too.
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
I've kissed a girl who wasn't attractive to me, thereby feeling nothing for her. The attractive female friends I have, I've known since childhood. My instincts prevent me from desiring a relationship with them, as it would feel incestous. 15 years ago, how often did you hear about "chemistry" in terms of dating?
Women who want muscles or height are derided as being shallow too.
I can't offer much in terms of height, but I pack a good dose more worth of muscle than the average man. I actually wish girls cared more about muscle and less about confidence. Todays ideal man packs less muscle than yesterdays ideal man.
Another comment to your post:
A woman can choose to take the active role if she wants to, but as a woman usually gets plenty of offers, she doesn't have to take this role.
ValentineWiggin
Veteran

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw
For me, it's alienating. I've nearly sabotaged several early romantic relationships for not responding in kind to some sort of admiration of my appearance, which is apparently an NT way of communicating mutual interest, and to me, translated, computes as "I notice XYZ physical arrangement of yours is in keeping with my personal pre-conception of desirability as compared to similar body parts among your peers". It's a foreign language to me, and for people who aren't wired to be aesthetically-driven, this disconnect can prove awkward early on, in the approach/flirting/early dating phase.
_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."
I've kissed a girl who wasn't attractive to me, thereby feeling nothing for her. The attractive female friends I have, I've known since childhood. My instincts prevent me from desiring a relationship with them, as it would feel incestous. 15 years ago, how often did you hear about "chemistry" in terms of dating?
Women who want muscles or height are derided as being shallow too.
I can't offer much in terms of height, but I pack a good dose more worth of muscle than the average man. I actually wish girls cared more about muscle and less about confidence. Todays ideal man packs less muscle than yesterdays ideal man.
Well neither of us were big players in the dating scene 15 years ago. My dad got married before then though, and he talked to me about finding someone who just "feels right". That sounds to me like a version of the concept. I've totally had make or break kisses before. Sometimes guys I had been crushing on for ages just fell completely flat. So disappointing.
If you know what the first mention of chemistry as a romantic concept is that would be super cool (nerd moment). It would make sense to me that it would be around the same time we figured out chemicals in the brain are responsible for that "in love" high feeling. I just can't find a definitive first mention.
So you don't approve of the criteria you think women use to make their choices?
Or is it just on a personal level and you wish what you feel are your strengths were a "hotter commodity".
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
Ah, but women are the choosers. They choose the guy they want, and they give him the subtle signals, then he approaches them. If you go pursuing after particular women, when they've given you no such signals, it is usually unproductive and fruitless. Or, as in my case, when you misread their signals as interest, when it's just friendliness. I have trouble reading warm friendliness from a girl, and distinguishing it from romantic interest.
One girl told me she didn't have a bf, and asked me if I was single, which sounded like interest to me. And later, when I asked her out, she said (politely) no. So I really can't tell the difference.
Feeling right can mean a lot of things, but commonly stretches further than attraction.
If you know what the first mention of chemistry as a romantic concept is that would be super cool (nerd moment). It would make sense to me that it would be around the same time we figured out chemicals in the brain are responsible for that "in love" high feeling. I just can't find a definitive first mention.
It seems like it was used in romantic contest for the first time on the POF message boards somewhere around 2004/2005. Before then, it was used to describe how to people got along. Kirsten Dunst for instance said that there were "chemistry" between her and Tobey Maguire during the filming of Spider-Man, but neither had any romantic feelings for each other in real life.
Seems more like you didn't like the way they kissed, though, rather than chemistry having anything to do with it...
Or is it just on a personal level and you wish what you feel are your strengths were a "hotter commodity".
I don't approve of what the media sets as the designated standard for men. Somehow, in 2012, this:

is sexier than this:

Yes!! ! You might as well say, "that's my favorite color of blue you're wearing." WTF is that supposed to mean, personally, to me?
Ah, but women are the choosers. They choose the guy they want, and they give him the subtle signals, then he approaches them. If you go pursuing after particular women, when they've given you no such signals, it is usually unproductive and fruitless. Or, as in my case, when you misread their signals as interest, when it's just friendliness. I have trouble reading warm friendliness from a girl, and distinguishing it from romantic interest.
One girl told me she didn't have a bf, and asked me if I was single, which sounded like interest to me. And later, when I asked her out, she said (politely) no. So I really can't tell the difference.
Um, everybody has a choice to reject relationships with people you don't want.
There are some advantages/disadvantages to both aggressive and passive approaches.
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
Oh. See I do this sometimes, because some women are often commenting negatively on their own appearance. If I notice a woman does this I make note of that habit and then drop a compliment here and there in the future, just because I hate to see people beating themselves up. Doesn't necessarily mean anything.
I really felt a good example of the reason for the social rule happened on a silly reality TV show this week, of all things.
A man on the bachelorette joked about a woman getting fat after marriage, Emily asked if that meant he'd stop loving her if she got fat, and he tried to split hairs by saying he'd still love her, but not on her.
You are equating men being honest about what they want with a man who made a derogatory joke about someone being fat. Those two are not equal, and it's insulting to the men who are being honest. I personally find such derogatory jokes to be despicable, and it tells quite a lot about the person making such a joke, but to use that as a reason to chastise other men who do not like a certain type of woman and have an opinion regarding it is ludicrous and demeaning.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Why Even Care? |
28 May 2025, 6:29 pm |
DOJ will investigate doctors - trans care to minors |
24 Apr 2025, 8:42 pm |
Feelings for a woman |
11 Jul 2025, 8:57 am |
I met a beautiful woman today |
24 Jun 2025, 8:04 am |