Yasmine wrote:
Movies, especially romantic comedies, are horribly misleading. Most of the "romance" there would be considered creepy by the majority IRL. But because it is fiction, the audience "knows" the characters + everything is always perfect; so it works on screen. That is the only place it works. Real life dating is too boring to be onscreen.
Thank you so much for explaining something that has mystified for decades! With nothing to go on in real life, I studied films carefully for clues as to how romances were initiated and it confused the hell out of me. The main general pattrern seemed to be: "man meets woman in unlikely place. They argue viciously, woman appears to hate man until...10 minutes later she succumbs and they are in bed together.". And the other main pattern seemed to me "man meets woman. Woman looks provocatively at him and arranges clothing to reveal intimate parts of her anatomy to him. 10 minutes later she succumbs and they are in bed together".
Neither of these 2 scenarios, or anything *remotely* resembling them ever happened to me, but at that time, I really did assume that movies must be based on real life as surely nobody would watch them? As a result got very very confused indeed. Eventually I realised that even 'realistic' films are total fantasy. Interesting that these same films are mentioned as being "realistic" in the reviews, so not only the audience, but film critics are also in on the pretence.
_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.