Take on why males have more trouble.. in general

Page 6 of 6 [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

11 Jan 2011, 9:03 pm

Pistonhead wrote:
nthach wrote:
The reason why I chose the Prius to represent the aspie guy is that a Prius is seen as odd, awkward, ugly(or cute), and it tries too hard at what it does. And the Civic Hybrid(you can tell by the wheels and mirrors) blends in, like most aspergirls. And just like how a Prius will show a dramatic drop in performance when its hybrid battery depletes, and it's a piss poor handing car, the aspie male is weak, timid and afraid to put his foot down.


Stop calling me a goddamn Prius! It's bad enough I the term aspie is applied to both me and people that can't use proper english and then you go and degrade me to being a car that good for nothing (yes, NOTHING!)

Also, I have put my foot down to you, nearly everyone on this board, and especially every person in real life that held no authority over me. I am not timid and weak YOU are timid and weak and you are projecting your own image onto other people, which seems to be all the self pitying aspies around here do.


Please forgive us, but in fairness, how could we possibly measure-up to a Megastud such as yourself? We are not worthy...

You've probably got 5-6 women clawing at your underpants as we speak, why don't you take pity on one of them?



Pistonhead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,732
Location: Bradenton, Florida

11 Jan 2011, 9:06 pm

Actually it's just 2 at the moment. Getting 6 women clawing at my underpants simultaneously involves kissing too much ass, 4 is hard enough for me.


_________________
"Some ideals are worth dying for"
==tOGoWPO==


HopeGrows
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,565
Location: In exactly the right place at exactly the right time.

11 Jan 2011, 9:35 pm

billsmithglendale wrote:
Yeah, I've heard similar things from other women (and men) about never leering or not noticing others visually as much -- my wife says pretty much the same thing, which can be frustrating on the times when I do want her to notice something in our environment, but can't point it out without attracting attention. Later on, I'll be like "did you see this?" and she won't know what I'm talking about. One time we were directly behind two transwomen who were fairly obvious (bad breast jobs, huge brows, manfaces) and she had no idea until I told her later.

It also made me wonder if maybe Hope fell into the above category as well -- just because you don't detect something doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.

With regards to a power game, there are two different ones we mentioned -- one would be leering intentionally so that your partner can notice -- not a very nice thing to do. The other would be to put relationship pressure or put a relationship in jeopardy over what might be an innocuous look -- just because I stare at that woman's chest for a few seconds doesn't mean that I don't want to stay with whom I'm with. Maybe I'm gazing with amazement at the natural wonders in front of me -- I don't deserve a big relationship fight over that. Asking her out, or continuing to stare -- yes.


@billsmithglendale, I think the miscommunication here is related to your use of the word leer. I was using the following definitions of the word:

"A desirous, sly, or knowing look.
To give an oblique, sneering, or suggestive look or grin."

The key element here is being obvious - not just stealing a glance, but using a look to clearly communicate sexual attraction. Stealing a glance doesn't bother me at all. As a matter of fact, when I'm on the receiving end, I'm usually kinda flattered by the attention - but part of that flattery is because my "admirer" has enough respect not to openly ogle me. My problem with being openly ogled is that, frankly, it's intrusive. When I'm at work, I don't want to know when a co-worker is thinking about banging me or what I'd look like on my knees - cause I'm there to work. Everyone is entitled to their own thoughts and fantasies, but when I receive an unwanted tour of some stranger's or worse, a co-worker....yuck.

I'm definitely not oblivious to guys creeping a sneak peak. But the men I work with are subtle - and I appreciate that. I'm pretty sure every one of them has pictured me naked - because that's kinda what most men do. From everything I've ever read, to every guy I've ever dated, that type of fantasizing is pretty typical. It's such an automatic reaction that it doesn't even necessarily indicate sexual desire....it's more like a, "Nice to meet you. I wonder what color her bra is...."

As far as whether you deserve flak for "leering" - that's between you and your wife. IMO, the thing that I wouldn't like about being with a man who openly looks at other women is: 1) it would feel humiliating to me, and 2) you know, leering at a real live girl is really not like looking a porn. I'm a pretty porn-positive person, because from my perspective, porn is just the kindling (pics or videos or whatever) that gets the fire burning. No one actually has sex with a video or a pic. But when you ogle a real woman, well.....you never really know how that's going to end up, do you? Even with the best intentions, can anyone honestly say they'd know exactly what they'd do if the woman they ogled turned around and shoved her number in your hand? Some women get off on cheating, home-wrecking, etc. What if she's one of those? I think there's a risk to ogling women IRL that just isn't there with porn.


_________________
What you feel is what you are and what you are is beautiful...


billsmithglendale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,223

12 Jan 2011, 12:12 pm

HopeGrows wrote:
billsmithglendale wrote:
Yeah, I've heard similar things from other women (and men) about never leering or not noticing others visually as much -- my wife says pretty much the same thing, which can be frustrating on the times when I do want her to notice something in our environment, but can't point it out without attracting attention. Later on, I'll be like "did you see this?" and she won't know what I'm talking about. One time we were directly behind two transwomen who were fairly obvious (bad breast jobs, huge brows, manfaces) and she had no idea until I told her later.

It also made me wonder if maybe Hope fell into the above category as well -- just because you don't detect something doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.

With regards to a power game, there are two different ones we mentioned -- one would be leering intentionally so that your partner can notice -- not a very nice thing to do. The other would be to put relationship pressure or put a relationship in jeopardy over what might be an innocuous look -- just because I stare at that woman's chest for a few seconds doesn't mean that I don't want to stay with whom I'm with. Maybe I'm gazing with amazement at the natural wonders in front of me -- I don't deserve a big relationship fight over that. Asking her out, or continuing to stare -- yes.


@billsmithglendale, I think the miscommunication here is related to your use of the word leer. I was using the following definitions of the word:

"A desirous, sly, or knowing look.
To give an oblique, sneering, or suggestive look or grin."

The key element here is being obvious - not just stealing a glance, but using a look to clearly communicate sexual attraction. Stealing a glance doesn't bother me at all. As a matter of fact, when I'm on the receiving end, I'm usually kinda flattered by the attention - but part of that flattery is because my "admirer" has enough respect not to openly ogle me. My problem with being openly ogled is that, frankly, it's intrusive. When I'm at work, I don't want to know when a co-worker is thinking about banging me or what I'd look like on my knees - cause I'm there to work. Everyone is entitled to their own thoughts and fantasies, but when I receive an unwanted tour of some stranger's or worse, a co-worker....yuck.

I'm definitely not oblivious to guys creeping a sneak peak. But the men I work with are subtle - and I appreciate that. I'm pretty sure every one of them has pictured me naked - because that's kinda what most men do. From everything I've ever read, to every guy I've ever dated, that type of fantasizing is pretty typical. It's such an automatic reaction that it doesn't even necessarily indicate sexual desire....it's more like a, "Nice to meet you. I wonder what color her bra is...."

As far as whether you deserve flak for "leering" - that's between you and your wife. IMO, the thing that I wouldn't like about being with a man who openly looks at other women is: 1) it would feel humiliating to me, and 2) you know, leering at a real live girl is really not like looking a porn. I'm a pretty porn-positive person, because from my perspective, porn is just the kindling (pics or videos or whatever) that gets the fire burning. No one actually has sex with a video or a pic. But when you ogle a real woman, well.....you never really know how that's going to end up, do you? Even with the best intentions, can anyone honestly say they'd know exactly what they'd do if the woman they ogled turned around and shoved her number in your hand? Some women get off on cheating, home-wrecking, etc. What if she's one of those? I think there's a risk to ogling women IRL that just isn't there with porn.


You're right, it was a definition thing. We started out with someone else saying "perved" (I think hale bopp), and then moved on to leer. I think maybe my own definition of leer is maybe not correct, so thanks for making that more explicit.

True enough, RE: the rest of your argument above.



nthach
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,457
Location: SF Bay Area

12 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm

Pistonhead wrote:
nthach wrote:
The reason why I chose the Prius to represent the aspie guy is that a Prius is seen as odd, awkward, ugly(or cute), and it tries too hard at what it does. And the Civic Hybrid(you can tell by the wheels and mirrors) blends in, like most aspergirls. And just like how a Prius will show a dramatic drop in performance when its hybrid battery depletes, and it's a piss poor handing car, the aspie male is weak, timid and afraid to put his foot down.


Stop calling me a goddamn Prius! It's bad enough I the term aspie is applied to both me and people that can't use proper english and then you go and degrade me to being a car that good for nothing (yes, NOTHING!)

Yea, like Nissan's any better. :roll: Nissan sucks, even a damn HYUNDAI or an Obamamobile(anything GM or Chrysler) is better than Nissan. We've got a 1996 Quest that's good for nothing except burning gas and oil, chewing through tires and schlepping goods from Home Depot and Costco.

And you're lucky that you're better off than 99.9% of this goddamn place with women.



Pistonhead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,732
Location: Bradenton, Florida

12 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm

Better off is relative. You want women all over you because you don't have women all over you. Then you have women all over you and it's not good enough. You start wanting all the sex and none of the drama, emotions, and all that.

I won't even get into cars, you seem to learn everything you know from commercials.


_________________
"Some ideals are worth dying for"
==tOGoWPO==


poopylungstuffing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,714
Location: Snapdragon Ridge

24 Feb 2011, 1:49 am

smudge wrote:
poopylungstuffing wrote:
I don't wanna have all those buttons.

When I am around my boyfriend, things are simple. I feel better just being around him...We can both be in the same room mutually focused on our own separate interests and I am happy as a clam....I don't wanna be "high maintenance"...He drives, so I often pay for dinner...I try not to impose upon him or make him feel obligated to do stuff...etc.
I do have the problem that when I become involved with someone, I can become very fixated on them...I am afraid to get mad...or have expectations....and then when I get upset, I internalize my feelings and try to rationalize them away...I am too clingy sometimes...that is MY problem...it should not have to inconvenience him...and it is MY fault if I get sad if he does not write to me that often..or as often as I write to him when I only see him every few days or so... he is lucky he has special interests that are so all-consuming that he does not have to be as needy as I may often be. I often admire people for posessing traits that I lack...I really need to find a way to become more fixated on things that might separate me from my oxytocin addiction..I was set up for it in a way..cause despite my AS traits, I a. was objectified a bit as a kid...b. wound up in my first relationship at an early age, and c. have seldom spent any time totally single..since I was 15...

So..my point is..that...ok...I forget what my point is....despite all this, I am unlikely to ever marry...let alone start a family or any of that stuff..I internalize my emotions...am afraid to make demands, and I beat myself up alot....

I envy guys...and I envy people who don't really need other people. I don't need a lot of people..I just tend to get too focused on whoever I am involved with...and what's more, I have been in a pattern of dating ASish types..I like him a lots...but yeah..he is stoic...hard to read..heavily wired into his interests...etc...but that is all part of the package I signed up for...I have to remind myself that I am too needy and thought loopy...I have the problems...not him...


Get fixated on studying people (not stalking obviously) and then you eventually become bored of them. And realise that it's better to be on your own and have things your way than sacrifice your own happiness for other people. I find that way it's a lot easier to get fixated on special interests when you don't care whether you do end up having friends or not. I suppose it comes to a point of 'giving up' and realising that there are 6.8 billion people in the world (and how big a number it is), and nobody out of that lot are particularly special, so why threat so much over one person, or a few people of that 6.8 billion? If you find it so hard to find your own happiness from other people then you've got to be a bit creative and find out how to make yourself happy on your own. It doesn't necessarily mean getting out the house and having a 'life'. It can be interests like cooking or crafts or gardening if that's what makes you happiest. If you find you can spend hours at a time doing that hobby and time just flies by, then you've got another way of making yourself happy without other people.


Maybe this is "unaspie-ish" of me..but I get lonesome. I can be lonesome when in a relationship..But throughout my life it has seemed that my scant options for friendship tend to include people I am romantically involved with. um....BELIEVE me that is not my PRIMARY interest...but it is something that helps keep me going..My special interests are another can o worms..I spend every day feeling alone when I am involluntarilly surrounded by people..all of whom drive me mad..When I am completely by myself..I feel almost as thought I don't exist...I was also conditioned from an early age blah blah blah..I have spent many hours alone with very intense hobbies..but in my current circumstance..I am unable to do that..hard to explain...I WISH I could do that again...I wish I could set up my rocking chair and prepare myself for a life of celibate spinsterhood where I care not about my looks and the horrible jumbled up self consciousness/loathing that might accompany my romantic fixations..but I am a person with very few friends...and I have the need for something..(this perhaps brings my "aspieness" into question, I suppose... :roll:



zen_mistress
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,033

24 Feb 2011, 4:34 am

Yeah, spinsterhood is a weird thing. I cant decide whether it is an exciting opportunity to fill a whole house up with cats, or travel through South America- or something very bothersome which I will kind of tolerate and wish I had some better situation.


_________________
"Caravan is the name of my history, and my life an extraordinary adventure."
~ Amin Maalouf

Taking a break.


Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

24 Feb 2011, 4:45 am

Pistonhead wrote:
Better off is relative. You want women all over you because you don't have women all over you. Then you have women all over you and it's not good enough. You start wanting all the sex and none of the drama, emotions, and all that.

I won't even get into cars, you seem to learn everything you know from commercials.


Exactly the reason why people can be unsatisfied with their lives living in our (relatively)ridiculously wealthy society.



CoalBogey
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 839