Is it creepy for older men to prefer younger women?

Page 14 of 16 [ 249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next


Is it creepy for older guys to prefer younger women?
Poll ended at 29 Aug 2013, 8:25 pm
Yes 13%  13%  [ 5 ]
No 58%  58%  [ 23 ]
Depends 30%  30%  [ 12 ]
Total votes : 40

aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,542

22 Jan 2014, 9:40 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
LKL wrote:
I suspect that the proper term is 'sexually tolerant.'


Well, look at the poll results.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt249907.html

The question is: "Which gender and age-range do you find the most sexually attractive/appealing?"

And, the male geezers did pick up a few votes. Some chicks actually prefer us. 8)


Well..at 53 i can vouch for that..as when i go dancing/walking.. my wife and i.. have to beat them off with a stick...

just kidding...

sort of....

But seriously..some women ..are looking for a little stability...

and obviously the hormones of an older ..guy.. well at least most of them..are
not locomotive express...

like mine used to be too...

i'm glad those days are over..too..SORT of...
now i do so many other things..

besides sex..(some form of stimulation that is)

it can take up too much time...in my opinion...

too much more interesting stuff to do in life..

than just that..but oh yah..it IS kool too...

and i would be seriously lying ..if i did not admit..

i still play around with it...

quite a bit....

i am even a free lance stripper now..

but that's another story...

totally...

i can usually do anything

i set my mind on...

to do...it

JUST DO IT..

AS NIKE SAY...

AND I JUST DID IT..

AS USUAL..:)

OH..AND HAVE A GREAT DAY!


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,542

22 Jan 2014, 9:55 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
Too bad followers of the bible believe otherwise that we are made out of dirt from an invisible magical man in the sky that does not exist but dictates our lives and such!


The Bible doesn't contradict the notion of old men being sexually attracted to young women, and vice versa.

When Abraham was a very old man, and after Sarah had died, he married Keturah, who gave him a whole slew of children. (Genesis 25).


YES..AND EVEN in my church..young women worship the flesh of an approximately 33 year old man..with nothing but something covering his private part.. doing an obviously very sensual yoga pose..as such..

presenting himself like this as a statue in front of the church..

And oh my GOD..!

i even have proof of it..

'RIGHT' here...

at this link:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/katiemiafr ... 038068326/

So when anyone gives me a problem about being a free lance

underwear model2..doing Yoga/TAI CHI poses and all of that..in my underwear...

i just direct them to that link!

and say see..i am in good company...

cannot you see..this...

(my friend) whoever i may be talking too....

and yah..if Jesus made it to 53..

he might be still doing that ..who knows..

maybe in Kashmir..

or some place like that...

TAI CHI/yOga..and all that eastern philosophy stuff..

that Buddhist leaning folks like Jesus..

might do to obtain..peace and bliss..

while all the babes just stare in amazement....

And say please Mr. please..

y not
me.....

OK THAT'S KINDA a joke..

but kinda not2...

as we ALL ARE JUST human animals2....

with all that horny stuff going on..

at least for most of them2....


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 10:42 am

http://www.youngerwomen4oldermen.com/

A dating website, specifically for the hot young blossoms who want to date geezers.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 10:59 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX34cGcCd24[/youtube]



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 14,824
Location: Aux Arcs

22 Jan 2014, 11:06 am

If there is a God, a big gator will eat that crazy ass wing nut.Let's pray on it.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 12:29 pm

Misslizard wrote:
If there is a God, a big gator will eat that crazy ass wing nut.Let's pray on it.


I'm surprised anyone takes him seriously. It looks like an act to me, a parody of the outdoorsman.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 5:36 pm

LKL wrote:
I suspect that the proper term is 'sexually tolerant.'


Different people like different things. Just because you aren't sexually attracted to codgers doesn't mean that no-one is.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm

TallyMan wrote:
Speaking from an evolutionary perspective, the thoughts of the "young women" may not coincide with those of males. From a female perspective (regarding mammals in general) females make a much more heavy personal investment in the birth and rearing of young, hence they need to be more selective in their choice of mate. A man could father hundreds of children in a year if he was some sort of tribal chief with a harem; but a woman is limited to one child in that time. It is in the woman's interests (for the successful perpetuation of her genes) to have a mate who is fit and healthy (which means young / same age) and one who is able to provide for her and her offspring and form a lasting mutually supporting bond. That provision may historically be hunting skills and the ability to keep other males from raping her; in more modern times this may translate into having money and power in which case age becomes less of an issue. Wealthy men with power seem to have no difficulty finding young women as their mates.

So the bottom line is that from a hard-wired evolutionary point of view, men and women have different agendas when it comes to seeking a mate. Sure, modern day lifestyles bear little in common with our hunter gatherer past, but these hard wired attitudes don't change as fast as society and the rules of society.


From an evolutionary perspective, current thinking seems to be that we're actually hardwired, and biologically adapted, for promiscuity:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ_fHrCQOGY[/youtube]

Monogamy (on the part of females) may have come about as an adaptation to an agricultural lifestyle, where men came to identify women as property. A girl would be the property of her father, who, in some cultures, would accept a dowry in exchange for betrothing her. And, he would usually try to arrange for his daughters to be married to good men, who could support them. This remains the case in countries like Saudi Arabia, where marriages are arranged by the parents.

Romantic love is something of a new phenomenon.

Now, in countries influenced by the West, women are on their own to attract their own mates, whether for marriage or for casual coitus. They have to wiggle their tails, flirt, and display their merchandise a bit. In Saudi Arabia, no viewing of the merchandise whatsoever prior to the post-nuptial celebrations.

In our hunter-gatherer past, the identity of a child's father was of no relevance, as the children were raised communally, and no-one could get away with hoarding things for himself.

With agriculture, individual hoarding replaced collectivism. A man wanted legitimate offspring to whom to leave his accumulated wealth. Hence, his women became his sole property, and other men were barred from breeding with them.

Today, a lot of women are seeking to enjoy the primitive sex-in-the-city lifestyle, with group coitus, and now, with the miracle of birth control, may enjoy such activities without the primitive inconvenience of pregnancy.

And, some women still seek the protection and support that a wealthier (and probably older) man can provide.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

22 Jan 2014, 7:43 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
LKL wrote:
I suspect that the proper term is 'sexually tolerant.'


Well, look at the poll results.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt249907.html

The question is: "Which gender and age-range do you find the most sexually attractive/appealing?"

And, the male geezers did pick up a few votes. Some chicks actually prefer us. 8)

Uh, yeah... probably 'chicks' your own age. Most women don't want men more than a decade younger than them, any more than they want men more than a decade older than them.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

22 Jan 2014, 7:47 pm

You know, it's great that polyamorous people aren't being seen as sexual deviants as much anymore, but they seem to have turned around and are now perpetuating the exact same claims on anyone that isn't like them as were once put on them: monogamists are the deviant, unnatural ones, who are just in denial of their own natures and who are deviating from our 'evolutionarily hardwired' way of being.

I'm naturally monogamous. Some women are; some men are. I wouldn't date a man who wasn't. Don't extrapolate from yourself onto everyone else, K?



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 8:10 pm

LKL wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
LKL wrote:
I suspect that the proper term is 'sexually tolerant.'


Well, look at the poll results.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt249907.html

The question is: "Which gender and age-range do you find the most sexually attractive/appealing?"

And, the male geezers did pick up a few votes. Some chicks actually prefer us. 8)

Uh, yeah... probably 'chicks' your own age.


Well, they'd be old hens by now. :wink:

The internet says that young women prefer old men: http://www.prweb.com/releases/KathrynMi ... 871700.htm

So, it must be true. :wink:



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 8:26 pm

LKL wrote:
You know, it's great that polyamorous people aren't being seen as sexual deviants as much anymore, but they seem to have turned around and are now perpetuating the exact same claims on anyone that isn't like them as were once put on them: monogamists are the deviant, unnatural ones, who are just in denial of their own natures and who are deviating from our 'evolutionarily hardwired' way of being.

I'm naturally monogamous. Some women are; some men are. I wouldn't date a man who wasn't. Don't extrapolate from yourself onto everyone else, K?


Well, this is a switch. The monogamous folks are becoming defensive. :lol:

Isn't this model more egalitarian/Feminist, and less Patriarchal, than the one proposed by Mr. Tallyman? Mr. Tallyman's model has women seeking to be sheltered and protected by a dominant man. The new model has people copulating all over the place, without regard to kierarchical constraints. In fact, there are no kierarchical constraints.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 117
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Jan 2014, 8:33 pm

LKL wrote:
I'm naturally monogamous. Some women are; some men are. I wouldn't date a man who wasn't.


You wouldn't date a man who wasn't "naturally" monogamous?

From the video: ask the man: "When you masturbate, do you look at the same porn star each time?" I have never heard a man who did this. Which means that he is not "naturally" monogamous. He may be monogamous out of personal preference, cultural upbringing, pussywhipping, or whatnot.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

23 Jan 2014, 1:43 am

I don't think masturbating counts, especially if someone doesn't have an actual partner.



mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,002
Location: Alberta, Canada

23 Jan 2014, 2:10 am

TallyMan wrote:
LKL wrote:
mr_bigmouth_502 wrote:
I say it's just instinctive. Younger women tend to be more fertile and produce healthier offspring, so as a result men are sort of pre-dispositioned to be attracted to them. As well, up until relatively recently, people had much shorter average lifespans, so people tended to "grow up" and take on adult responsibilities more quickly, such as producing offspring.

Human society may have changed a lot in the last few hundred years, but evolution progresses at a much, much slower pace. It's sort of like the reason why we're having so many problems with obesity nowadays; humans are pre-dispositioned to crave foods rich in fats and other nutrients, but since it's become so much easier to obtain food without putting any work into it, we eat more while exercising less, and as a result we get fat.

Like it or not, human beings are nothing more than highly-intelligent animals. We like to think of ourselves as not even being in the same category as other animals, but in the big picture, we're still just mammals, just like dolphins and chimpanzees.

Eeyeahh, that totally discounts anything the "young women" in question might think about the issue.


Speaking from an evolutionary perspective, the thoughts of the "young women" may not coincide with those of males. From a female perspective (regarding mammals in general) females make a much more heavy personal investment in the birth and rearing of young, hence they need to be more selective in their choice of mate. A man could father hundreds of children in a year if he was some sort of tribal chief with a harem; but a woman is limited to one child in that time. It is in the woman's interests (for the successful perpetuation of her genes) to have a mate who is fit and healthy (which means young / same age) and one who is able to provide for her and her offspring and form a lasting mutually supporting bond. That provision may historically be hunting skills and the ability to keep other males from raping her; in more modern times this may translate into having money and power in which case age becomes less of an issue. Wealthy men with power seem to have no difficulty finding young women as their mates.

So the bottom line is that from a hard-wired evolutionary point of view, men and women have different agendas when it comes to seeking a mate. Sure, modern day lifestyles bear little in common with our hunter gatherer past, but these hard wired attitudes don't change as fast as society and the rules of society.


@LKL: I'm not a young woman, so I wouldn't really know how they feel about it, to be completely honest. I'm also not trying to imply that it is or isn't creepy for men to be attracted to younger women, just that there's probably some evolutionary reason for men being attracted to younger women.

@TallyMan: I agree, despite the fact that it's been many thousands of years since we've been hunter-gatherers, human beings nowadays are still mostly hard-wired the same way they were back then. We still have the same drives and urges for the most part.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

23 Jan 2014, 2:17 am

If our digestive systems have evolved since the advent of farming (and they have), why couldn't our brains have evolved somewhat as well?