David Duke DEFENDS the rights of other races and cultures!

Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

Roman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,298

26 Jul 2009, 5:24 am

I know that David Duke has a reputation of being a racist. But based on what he claims he is a separatist rather than racist. He supports the separatism of whites, just as much as he supports the separatism of other cultures. He basically opposes globalization in order to preserve every unique culture the way it is meant to be, whether white or otherwise. While most of his work defends white ppl against globalization, he also defends other cultures against that same threat as well: consider the following quotes (comming from here http://www.davidduke.com/general/the-li ... sm_11.html ) :

David Duke wrote:
Building a McDonald’s and a coca cola machine on every street corner of the world is not only injurious to the health of the people of the world, it is uniformity, not diversity.


David Duke wrote:
On the opposite hand, do we really want the Third world to be made into to economic colonies for the New World Order and the new globalism? What will this do to them, to their own cultures, to the well being of the world’s ecology?


David Duke wrote:
I respect all the people’s and cultures of the world. I say that every people have the right to preserve their heritage, their culture, their own political and economic sovereignty.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 84
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

26 Jul 2009, 6:38 am

Yup. Anywhere but Here.

He wants Negros and Jews born in the U.S. to go away or to live separately from the other white folk. What Duke wants is Aparthiedt.

ruveyn



sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

26 Jul 2009, 11:32 am

ruveyn wrote:
Yup. Anywhere but Here.

He wants Negros and Jews born in the U.S. to go away or to live separately from the other white folk. What Duke wants is Aparthiedt.

ruveyn


Separate and Apart is Equal topic

Sounds like the rantings of someone who used to post here. :roll:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Cyanide
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,003
Location: The Pacific Northwest

26 Jul 2009, 9:14 pm

Yeah, not all self-proclaimed white nationalists want to kill other races. That's a hugely wrong stereotype. I've actually dug around on Stormfront.com because I was curious to see what they really think (as opposed to what the corporate media tells us). Guess what? They don't even agree with each other. Their membership ranges from "if you even have one drop of non-white in you, you shouldn't be alive" to "if you act white and look white enough, whatever". Most of the people on there just seem to want each 'race' to stay in their own ancestral homelands and not mix. I don't know how they plan to do that though, since they can't even agree on what constitutes a "white" person.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

26 Jul 2009, 9:45 pm

Cyanide wrote:
Yeah, not all self-proclaimed white nationalists want to kill other races. That's a hugely wrong stereotype. I've actually dug around on Stormfront.com because I was curious to see what they really think (as opposed to what the corporate media tells us). Guess what? They don't even agree with each other. Their membership ranges from "if you even have one drop of non-white in you, you shouldn't be alive" to "if you act white and look white enough, whatever". Most of the people on there just seem to want each 'race' to stay in their own ancestral homelands and not mix. I don't know how they plan to do that though, since they can't even agree on what constitutes a "white" person.


Tribal primates like that should just be killed to allow the rest of society to progress already.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 94
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

27 Jul 2009, 2:04 am

skafather84 wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
Yeah, not all self-proclaimed white nationalists want to kill other races. That's a hugely wrong stereotype. I've actually dug around on Stormfront.com because I was curious to see what they really think (as opposed to what the corporate media tells us). Guess what? They don't even agree with each other. Their membership ranges from "if you even have one drop of non-white in you, you shouldn't be alive" to "if you act white and look white enough, whatever". Most of the people on there just seem to want each 'race' to stay in their own ancestral homelands and not mix. I don't know how they plan to do that though, since they can't even agree on what constitutes a "white" person.


Tribal primates like that should just be killed to allow the rest of society to progress already.


An interesting proposition to create anti-racist brutality. Evidently the enthusiasm of humanity for brutality in any form cannot be quelled.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

27 Jul 2009, 5:56 am

You're gullable. I you belive that you will belive anything. David Duke is a convicted fraudster.

Here is a talk with Nick Griffin and David Duke.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04QolIvfQEw[/youtube]



ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

27 Jul 2009, 6:06 am

wanting each "race" to "stay" in their "homeland" is utter utter BS and nothinb but utter utter BS

whats the "homeland" of a texan? texas?
if texas is the homeland of a texan, why isnt norway homeland of a black-as-coal ghanese? he was born here.


_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''


Wombat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2006
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,051

27 Jul 2009, 6:48 am

The Japanese are very "racist" in that they love the Japanese race and culture. They see no reason that they should allow millions of foreigners into their country.

I do not see that I am "better" than a Japanese or Greeks or Russians or Irishmen or Chinese or whatever.

I will allow them their pride and their country.

I just want MY pride and MY country.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

27 Jul 2009, 3:04 pm

Sand wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
Yeah, not all self-proclaimed white nationalists want to kill other races. That's a hugely wrong stereotype. I've actually dug around on Stormfront.com because I was curious to see what they really think (as opposed to what the corporate media tells us). Guess what? They don't even agree with each other. Their membership ranges from "if you even have one drop of non-white in you, you shouldn't be alive" to "if you act white and look white enough, whatever". Most of the people on there just seem to want each 'race' to stay in their own ancestral homelands and not mix. I don't know how they plan to do that though, since they can't even agree on what constitutes a "white" person.


Tribal primates like that should just be killed to allow the rest of society to progress already.


An interesting proposition to create anti-racist brutality. Evidently the enthusiasm of humanity for brutality in any form cannot be quelled.


A Modest Proposal indeed but I would rather not wait for the dregs to die off and allow society to catch up.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

27 Jul 2009, 3:51 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Tribal primates like that should just be killed to allow the rest of society to progress already.

In other words, you wish to respond to people you disagree with or don't like with brutality, hatred, and intolerance.

How the hell does that make you any different from the nut cases at Stormfront?


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 84
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

27 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm

Wombat wrote:
The Japanese are very "racist" in that they love the Japanese race and culture. They see no reason that they should allow millions of foreigners into their country.

I do not see that I am "better" than a Japanese or Greeks or Russians or Irishmen or Chinese or whatever.

I will allow them their pride and their country.

I just want MY pride and MY country.


You already have your country. To find your pride, search your accomplishments.

ruveyn



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

27 Jul 2009, 4:58 pm

Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Tribal primates like that should just be killed to allow the rest of society to progress already.

In other words, you wish to respond to people you disagree with or don't like with brutality, hatred, and intolerance.

How the hell does that make you any different from the nut cases at Stormfront?



Because I actually wish to move the culture and society forward rather than regress it. Early man must die for modern man to thrive. The base racial tribalism results in hatred and intolerance that stands as a wall on the direct path toward societal progress. That wall clearly must be destroyed in order to continue forward.

...And you still fail to see that I tend to express myself in hyperbole more than in literalism.

There's nothing wrong with judicious use of intolerance. Intolerance for exclusive tribalism and the intolerances that it breeds is not a bad thing at all.

Afterall, if you tolerated everything, then you'd have to tolerate murderers, rapists, and that ilk as well. Last I checked, you don't. Quit the BS half-thought-out morality trip. You're SUPPOSED to be smarter than that.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

27 Jul 2009, 5:26 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Because I actually wish to move the culture and society forward rather than regress it. Early man must die for modern man to thrive. The base racial tribalism results in hatred and intolerance that stands as a wall on the direct path toward societal progress. That wall clearly must be destroyed in order to continue forward.

[Godwin]The Nazis also thought they were moving culture and society forward.[/Godwin] Basically, you are advocating advancing your vision of how the world should be through the barrel of a gun.

Quote:
...And you still fail to see that I tend to express myself in hyperbole more than in literalism.

On an Aspie forum, do you expect your comments to be taken any way other than literally?

Quote:
There's nothing wrong with judicious use of intolerance. Intolerance for exclusive tribalism and the intolerances that it breeds is not a bad thing at all.

Afterall, if you tolerated everything, then you'd have to tolerate murderers, rapists, and that ilk as well. Last I checked, you don't. Quit the BS half-thought-out morality trip. You're SUPPOSED to be smarter than that.

Tolerance of other's opinions is important. Tolerance of actions that harm others is not. There is an important difference- freedom of conscience is a pillar of any free society. You can not legislate what the "correct" view on any issue is. You can outlaw causing direct harm to others.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

27 Jul 2009, 5:48 pm

Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Because I actually wish to move the culture and society forward rather than regress it. Early man must die for modern man to thrive. The base racial tribalism results in hatred and intolerance that stands as a wall on the direct path toward societal progress. That wall clearly must be destroyed in order to continue forward.

[Godwin]The Nazis also thought they were moving culture and society forward.[/Godwin] Basically, you are advocating advancing your vision of how the world should be through the barrel of a gun.


What society doesn't have its vision of the world enforced and advanced through the point of a gun?

You might wanna check out what the cops wear again and all the new technology coming out under the category of "riot control".

Your ideals aren't even expressed in reality anywhere nor do they have any basis in reality.


Quote:
Quote:
...And you still fail to see that I tend to express myself in hyperbole more than in literalism.

On an Aspie forum, do you expect your comments to be taken any way other than literally?


It's also part of my personality that I express things through more blunt and blatant hyperbolic visuals.


Quote:
Quote:
There's nothing wrong with judicious use of intolerance. Intolerance for exclusive tribalism and the intolerances that it breeds is not a bad thing at all.

Afterall, if you tolerated everything, then you'd have to tolerate murderers, rapists, and that ilk as well. Last I checked, you don't. Quit the BS half-thought-out morality trip. You're SUPPOSED to be smarter than that.

Tolerance of other's opinions is important. Tolerance of actions that harm others is not. There is an important difference- freedom of conscience is a pillar of any free society. You can not legislate what the "correct" view on any issue is. You can outlaw causing direct harm to others.


Tolerance of opinions is a weak and veiled means of being able to hold flawed ideals despite their being wrong.

Though I think it's hilarious that you're standing up for the racists. David Duke would be proud. :wink:


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson