Mw99 wrote:
Spokane_Girl wrote:
Pfft, IQ tests are stupid, they're not accurate. Only doctor tests are but sometimes they are inaccurate too. I didn't bother finishing this test because I hate time limits. I got to question eight before I quit.
Time limits are part of the test.
I don't know much abou IQ tests, but I don't think that time limit is usualy caculated that way. Really the questions are hard and the way the time limit is put it's very tricky. This test is biased against people who are "slow" to resolve problems. A lack of working memory could also be handicaping in this test.
That you had difficulty in this test don't mean you're not samrt. Ther are many ways to be smart. AND THEIR IS OTHER THINGS THAT BE SMART!! !!
Overall it look like the "Raven's Progressive Matrices",(in which time do not count) which measuring "logic".
I was tested in it in the 95-100th percentile.
A similar test in the weschler put me in the 91th percentile.(Greater that most the other sub tests, no one with a greater score, and some score quite bad.)
This test on the internet put me in the 87th percentile.
So they mostly close to each others.
This is quite good scores.
Am I satified with them? Sadly no.....
It's because I'd always seemed "smart", and be "smart" is the only thing I'm good to. Also because I'm a perfectionnist (aspie trait), really too perfectionnist....