I sucked at this IQ test. How about you?

Page 3 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Silvervarg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 787
Location: Sweden

21 Aug 2009, 6:29 am

Mdyar wrote:
Quote:
Is the D.K test that other timed matrix reasoning one?


Yep http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf

This one I get a + 1 deviation also(115) and as mentioned before the consensus is that there is a problem with the norming sample .
A proctored test ~145, D.K.~ 130; 130 to 115 etc.
The complaint I hear is it's exactly one deviation down(15).

Pretty close, 122 on that one.


_________________
Sing songs. Songs sung. Samsung.


outlier
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,429

21 Aug 2009, 7:33 am

^ It is not comparable to your previous score posted because the DK test is calculated on the basis of a standard deviation (SD) of 15. The test posted by the OP has the result based on SD 24 and (in unhighlighted text) the result based on SD 16. Therefore, you scored much better in the DK test.



Silvervarg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 787
Location: Sweden

23 Aug 2009, 12:21 pm

outlier wrote:
^ It is not comparable to your previous score posted because the DK test is calculated on the basis of a standard deviation (SD) of 15. The test posted by the OP has the result based on SD 24 and (in unhighlighted text) the result based on SD 16. Therefore, you scored much better in the DK test.

Doh! :eew:
:lol:


_________________
Sing songs. Songs sung. Samsung.


Luquitas
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1

14 Oct 2010, 5:08 pm

I got 151

The same or a better result is only reached by 1.68% of the people taking the test.

But it was after I did several tests, so anyone can learn.



OddFiction
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2010
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: Ontario, Canada

14 Oct 2010, 6:00 pm

I started to get pissed off and confused by question number 14.
Somehow though, I managed to get 108. I believe there's something wrong with the test.



Stonecold
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 568
Location: Kern County, CA

14 Oct 2010, 6:55 pm

That is not an accurate IQ test.



aphoryzm
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

19 Oct 2010, 9:33 am

Luquitas wrote:
I got 151

The same or a better result is only reached by 1.68% of the people taking the test.

But it was after I did several tests, so anyone can learn.


what did you score on your first test, and how many times did you take it to receive the score of 151?



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

19 Oct 2010, 9:57 am

Stonecold wrote:
That is not an accurate IQ test.
True. People are getting scores that are not just inconsistent with an IQ score measured with a more diverse array of tests, but also inconsistent with their ability to mentally manipulate shapes. That is because the test depends so heavily on processing speed that the result is limited by that factor, and it's impossible to tell what part of the score came from processing speed and what part from actual ability to interpret shapes.

It's not precise, either. My result was 50 points away from the result I got a year ago, and I know for a fact my brain doesn't fluctuate nearly that much.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


Last edited by Callista on 19 Oct 2010, 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Coldkick
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 397
Location: Sarnia, Ontario

19 Oct 2010, 10:01 am

This is purely a patterning test. Got a 118 (22.96% met or got higher), got bored about 75% through and didn't try to dissect the patterns as perfectly anymore.



aphoryzm
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

19 Oct 2010, 11:16 am

there was a 22pt difference between the tests that i took. would the best test's score be considered accurate, or as accurate as the first? i saw on a message board that someone else had taken it twice, and received the same score both times.



ediself
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,202
Location: behind you!!!

19 Oct 2010, 11:40 am

The result of the test

By the answers you submitted your IQ is

104

The same or a better result is only reached by

43.54% of the people taking the test.

i'm clearly stupid ! ! hehe.AND i have a headache now thanks :D



industrialx
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 110
Location: Dis

19 Oct 2010, 11:44 am

I looked at the first question, and quit. I felt like my eyes had exploded.


_________________
Llamas are larger than frogs.
On the way here, I saw a thing that was not on top of another thing.


nicky
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 331
Location: Nevada

19 Oct 2010, 2:27 pm

i got 118, but on several of them, i just picked at random just to have something before the time limit was over. it was hard, cause my browser wouldn't let it reload, so i didn't know how much time i had left!! i guess maybe i'm a good guesser? my processing speed is rather on the slow end. most definitely not an accurate IQ test... more of a processing speed test, with variants for good guessing. :lol:

on another note, i scored 100% on the Raven test.


_________________
-nicky


aphoryzm
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

19 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm

what do you mean 100%? did you take the actual RPM and answer every problem correctly? if so, what was your overall IQ?



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

19 Oct 2010, 4:39 pm

That would be "hitting the ceiling" of a test, and it happens often enough. I hit the ceiling of the WAIS-III vocabulary subtest, for example, because I simply defined all the words they had on the test. It's not uncommon in autistics because we've got abilities all over the place, and some of them will be unusually high. I'm just good with words, that's all. I guess nicky's good with patterns. It's impossible to tell the IQ when someone hits the ceiling of a test because you can't tell whether that last question was the most difficult he could answer, or whether he might be able to answer ten more. It just means that the test is not broad enough in scope to properly assess your ability to follow patterns.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


aphoryzm
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

19 Oct 2010, 5:26 pm

edited



Last edited by aphoryzm on 21 Oct 2010, 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.