I sucked at this IQ test. How about you?

Page 4 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

aphoryzm
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

19 Oct 2010, 5:26 pm

edited



Last edited by aphoryzm on 21 Oct 2010, 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Poirot
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 19
Location: Here

20 Oct 2010, 2:59 am

You think that's bad, I barely survived the GRE!



thehandmedown
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 204
Location: we are nowhere and its now

20 Oct 2010, 3:30 am

100. what a weird test



memyselfI
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 100
Location: England

20 Oct 2010, 3:42 am

The result of the test
By the answers you submitted your IQ is

123

You answered 18 questions correctly (out of 35 - 1/2)

Was very frustrating test, wanted to give up almost as soon as I started.
I wasn't sure about most answers (any?).
Couldn't see timer to know when to make last minute guess.
But guessed most questions by concentrating on easiest pattern and finding a match and then guessing between alternatives.
Overall logic pattern didn't click for me - don't really understand why shapes changed. Could see some logic in no of dots and lines, in shapes.

Don't remember anything to compare it with, been a long time, thought I might have been higher, expect my brain cells have been dying.



Lissy65
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2010
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 16
Location: Britain

20 Oct 2010, 1:35 pm

I scored 109, (only 35.8% scored more), so above average, but below what I normally get. I think that a few questions were repeats and it wasn't that good a test, I also didn't realise that A and B were next to the pattern. Also, I'm not sure about how it was normalised (it mentioned that the average was supposed to be 100).



Mysty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,762

20 Oct 2010, 5:26 pm

I found many of the questions too busy. Too much going on visually.

I'm surprised more only one other person has commented on that. (At least they were talking about the same thing.)

I've taken other pattern recognition IQ tests and done well.

This one, well, maybe I would have actually done well if I finished it, but, too unpleasant to bother.


_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.


jmnixon95
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,931
Location: 미국

20 Oct 2010, 6:14 pm

152.
That's only visual IQ, not an IQ test of general intelligence.



aphoryzm
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

20 Oct 2010, 7:43 pm

jmnixon95 wrote:
152.
That's only visual IQ, not an IQ test of general intelligence.


pics or it didn't happen



nicky
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 331
Location: Nevada

22 Oct 2010, 10:09 pm

aphoryzm wrote:
what do you mean 100%? did you take the actual RPM and answer every problem correctly? if so, what was your overall IQ?


i'm referring to this post from a couple years ago...

How do you go with this Raven's IQ test?

it was just an online test, and i got all the problems right. i've never had an official IQ test before.

Callista wrote:
That would be "hitting the ceiling" of a test, and it happens often enough. I hit the ceiling of the WAIS-III vocabulary subtest, for example, because I simply defined all the words they had on the test. It's not uncommon in autistics because we've got abilities all over the place, and some of them will be unusually high. I'm just good with words, that's all. I guess nicky's good with patterns. It's impossible to tell the IQ when someone hits the ceiling of a test because you can't tell whether that last question was the most difficult he could answer, or whether he might be able to answer ten more. It just means that the test is not broad enough in scope to properly assess your ability to follow patterns.


exactly, though it's not like it was some official test done by some professional or anything... and i don't think that test was very difficult overall, anyways... the problems were a lot simpler than the ones in this test, plus it wasn't timed. of course, the ones in this test were math-bases, and the ones in that test were shape-based, so i guess maybe i'm comparing apples and oranges.


_________________
-nicky