Artificial Intelligence
have you seen the milo demo?
YouTube - E3 2009 - Project Natal - Milo Demo with Peter Molyneux 720p HD
i don't know why but the link from my address bar posted like that (maybe because of youtube's new partnership today with vevo or whtvr it's called?)
anyway, i'm fascinated with all the things going on in AI.
i think you'll like being in this field if you get into it. thanks for posting the video!
YouTube - E3 2009 - Project Natal - Milo Demo with Peter Molyneux 720p HD
i don't know why but the link from my address bar posted like that (maybe because of youtube's new partnership today with vevo or whtvr it's called?)
anyway, i'm fascinated with all the things going on in AI.
i think you'll like being in this field if you get into it. thanks for posting the video!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDvHlwNvXaM[/youtube]
cool
The cheapest way of producing Intelligence is to make babies. That way you get R.I. (Real Intelligence) instead of A.I.
It would also behoove us to stop calling flexibly programmable machine Artificial Intelligence. No matter how cleverly we get our robots to do things, they are not intelligent. They are simply executing rules specified by a human.
ruveyn
ruveyn
It would also behoove us to stop calling flexibly programmable humans Real Intelligence. No matter how cleverly we get out babies to do things, they are not intelligent. They are simply executing rules specified by physics.
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.
It would also behoove us to stop calling flexibly programmable humans Real Intelligence. No matter how cleverly we get out babies to do things, they are not intelligent. They are simply executing rules specified by physics.
The universe is what it is. Humans write the laws of physics to describe how the universe is. Laws are man-made artifacts, even the laws of physics.
Humans are no programmed by an intelligent entity. They are physical entities that operate in the manner of physical entities and whose operation is partially described by the man-made laws of physics.
Laws are not causes, they are descriptions.
ruveyn
It depends on how you define "intelligence".
We can build and program machines that don't make mistakes humans make.
_________________
1975, ASD: Asperger's Syndrome (diagnosed: October 22, 2009)
Interests: science, experimental psychology, psychophysics, music (listening and playing (guitar)) and visual arts
Don't focus on your weaknesses, focus on your strengths
It would also behoove us to stop calling flexibly programmable humans Real Intelligence. No matter how cleverly we get out babies to do things, they are not intelligent. They are simply executing rules specified by physics.
The universe is what it is. Humans write the laws of physics to describe how the universe is. Laws are man-made artifacts, even the laws of physics.
Humans are no programmed by an intelligent entity. They are physical entities that operate in the manner of physical entities and whose operation is partially described by the man-made laws of physics.
Laws are not causes, they are descriptions.
ruveyn
I didnt say squat about human laws. I did not say squat about descriptions or perceptions of physics. I said that humans operate based purely on the interactions that are factors of the universe. Reason or perception has nothing to do with that. Our actions are fully based on the workings of the universe, regardless of how correctly we codify it. I dont believe in free will either. We are ultimately sub atomic automations just as the whole universe is.
I also didnt suggest that humans were created by an intelligence. That which we create is a secondary function of our existence. In that sense, our inventions are no more created by an intelligence than we were.
The logical conclusion is that anything we create has the potential to achieve exactly that which we can and have achieved. "no matter how cleverly we get our babies..."
Lately your posts have sounded suspiciously like several old guys that should have known better.
You know Lord Kelvin? It was said for the first half of his life he was never wrong. For the second half, he was never right.
"X-rays will prove to be a hoax."
"Radio has no future."
"Trust you will avoid the gigantic mistake of alternating current."
- Simon Newcomb (1835-1909)
Lately you seem to be dulling in your arguments, dismissive of potentialities that disrupt your world view.
Are you getting feeble rigid, unable to grasp a future that you will not see?
It is said that in the beginning of life, we can see the future, but only vaguely. In the middle years, we have some vision both ways. But in the autumn of our years, life is primarily about hindsight. About life already lived.
Lately you sound like "There is nothing new to be discovered". How ridiculous is that?
I'd like to close with this:
- Peter Ustinov
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.
Last edited by Fuzzy on 10 Dec 2009, 3:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
_________________
1975, ASD: Asperger's Syndrome (diagnosed: October 22, 2009)
Interests: science, experimental psychology, psychophysics, music (listening and playing (guitar)) and visual arts
Don't focus on your weaknesses, focus on your strengths
_________________
1975, ASD: Asperger's Syndrome (diagnosed: October 22, 2009)
Interests: science, experimental psychology, psychophysics, music (listening and playing (guitar)) and visual arts
Don't focus on your weaknesses, focus on your strengths
If I'm right about acausal interactions, then there is no reason to have to discard free will even from a super-deterministic model.
If I'm right about acausal interactions, then there is no reason to have to discard free will even from a super-deterministic model.
I think you are onto something. It is somewhat analogous to chaotic dynamics emerging from a deterministic system.
ruveyn
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Can artificial stars be created? |
13 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm |
Management might finally stop questioning my intelligence |
19 Mar 2024, 1:36 pm |
House Intelligence Chairman - National Security threat |
14 Feb 2024, 4:18 pm |