Revised Systemic Universe Theory

Post Reply New Topic

I was wondering what you think of the lunar cycle and how it may affect our hormones, tides, animal behavior and such.

Is that a matter of opinion or a subject for study of correlations?

I am not a mathematician, so you request has no bearing on what I'm trying to do as seemingly my work has none for you. This is a philosophical book and is trying to display what your own eyes should be able to see. I am not trying to predict anything because that belongs to the future. This is just trying to show you what you should be able to see as an individual in the present and if you can't or don't want to see that, that is your decision not mine.

You can easily misinterpret the intentions of strongly spoken Aspies. I find Ruveyn refreshingly realistic. And well intentioned, Some stuff can be pretty funny sometimes. I'm sorry Ruveyn if i stepped on your toes here.

A solid philosophical work, as with a scientific theory, is valuable not for prophesy, but for indicating consequences. The future is very much concerned with consequences.

Sorry but as the reply by me before this shows, this is a philosophy book, not a science primer

Yes, it is perspective and we are rushing about like chickens with no heads today, which means we are not stopping and looking at results but will end up with consequences because we are ignoring reality.

You are right on this - read Ernest Becker's 'Denial of Death', for the psychological perspective on this. I'm not trying to tell people what to think but 'to' think, which isn't the same thing. In other words take time to observe, not allow yourself to get rushed into precipitous action of the sort you are on about.

I personally am glad to here this because the problem is really self sabotage by those who do not trust the system, rather than the belief that 'building communities through faith' is absurd. The problem is lack of trust, displayed as laziness and moral cowardice (Giving up on yourself and slipping into apathy - giving up on others and turning your back on the world): This is the difference between innocence and guilt in my opinion - the courage to leap forward into an unknown or uncertain future built on nothing tangible (materialism) or to grasp the solid in fear of this trusting in nothing at all (zero point energy or the creativity that lets go of the prejudices and beliefs of yesterday, to stare into the void of tomorrow (The Undiscovered Country/ 'Is it safe?' The Marathon Man).

If you want to get more ideas of mine to pull apart, may I suggest you visit the above post in the arts sections, which should really be here I suppose because the because the book isn't fiction but philosophical speculation (Zennish)

its all good

I think this body of work is common knowledge around wp, its just worded your way. Deductive reasoning is at play here, and logical answers pop into new threads all over this place. Its all the same just worded our own ways. Of course individuals put different weights on different theory's, But no body around here has argued nonsense to me. Plain sense rules WP

Well if you want a scientific angle to this - may I suggest that you look up The Electric Universe Theory, propounded by People like Wally Thornhill (Article in Nexus Magazine sometime back) as that connects to my ideas from the physics viewpoint, more than atomic theory does

More thoughts to consider - positivism leads us up and out into the world as conscious beings, just as negativity leads us into ourselves through distrust of our own abilities and the world in general. Negativity leads to destruction because it smashes the links we have with reality/ other people - optimism is creative because it reaches out and does the opposite, putting ideas (and trust) out there, through a leap of faith, rather than retreating because we have none. Bipolarism is this in the individual and the effects of it can be easily studied and projected into the world as effects upon society in the forms of creativity and peace, destruction and war.

The future is orientation up and out, abandoning all identity because it is abandoning prejudice. The past is turning down and in, holding onto all old hurts and is therefore nothing but prejudice and identity (innocence is abandoning the old past for a new future - materialism is holding onto the boring, certain past, for fear that what we have, we might lose - including our mind (identity) and possessions as well as status, with regards to others in society: In other words you are out of your mind or deep in it, afraid to let go). Taking things seriously is a rigid holding onto life, crushing it to death and attacking all that threatens it just as taking things lightly is moving on with your life and seeking new challenges.

Science by the way is neutral - not what should or shouldn't be but what is or isn't (exists or doesn't). This is the same approach as Eastern Philosophy.

You might like to see my artwork atArtworkfor an example of how I view Levity/ Gravity and related synonyms in other subjects plus original rendition of my theory and where this could take humanity (very sci-fi).

When I belonged to The Hypography Science Forums some time back, I had the signature 'My life is my lab and my proof is to be found in your lives', just as Scientology has the motto 'If it isn't true for you, then it isn't true'. In both cases the meaning is experiential and if it isn't something you've experienced, then it may well appear speculative goobledygook.

Frankly, it's a good idea to distance yourself from Scientology.

agreed, I second that notion. And take it easy, nothing to proove, we get it, page.