Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

Willard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,647

05 May 2010, 11:57 am

Reuters wrote:
...equals school trouble later

By Reuters - Mon May 3, 3:31 PM PDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Toddlers who watch too much TV may struggle in school later, with measurably lower scores in math, and they may get bullied more than other children, Canadian and U.S. researchers reported on Monday.
Related Articles


Less surprisingly, children who watched more TV at age 2 weighed more by the time they were 10 and ate more snacks and soft drinks, the researchers reported in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine.

"The results support previous suggestions that early childhood television exposure undermines attention," wrote Linda Pagani of the University of Montreal and colleagues at Bowling Green University in Kentucky and the University of Michigan.

They said children who spend more time watching TV and less time playing with other kids may lose valuable chances to learn social skills.

The researchers started with more than 2,000 children taking part in a larger study. Their parents reported how much TV the children watched at 2-1/2 and later at 4-1/2 year old.

The checked with the children's teachers and doctors when the subjects were 10.

Every additional weekly hour of television at 29 months corresponded to a 7 percent drop in classroom attention and a 6 percent drop in math skills, the researchers found.

An hour more TV a week as a toddler meant a child was 10 percent more likely to be bullied, exercised 13 percent less, weighed 5 percent more and ate 10 percent more snacks, they found.

"Despite clear, age-specific recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics that discourage any screen media exposure during infancy and less than two hours per day beyond 2 years of age, parents show poor factual knowledge and awareness of such existing guidelines," the researchers wrote.

In their group, most of the children watched no more TV than this recommended amount but 11 percent watched more, they said.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox; editing by Chris Wilson)


Did it not occur to these rocket scientists that the kids end up sitting in front of the television so much BECAUSE they have difficulties developing social skills? :roll:



Michael_Stuart
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 500

05 May 2010, 12:49 pm

Willard wrote:
Did it not occur to these rocket scientists that the kids end up sitting in front of the television so much BECAUSE they have difficulties developing social skills? :roll:


That seems unlikely. Children are often put in front of the television by their parents to keep them occupied, that's where most of the watching takes place. The parents would probably be too busy (or rather, would believe themselves to be too busy) to drive their kid all over time to their "play-dates". It is not until older that the social aspect would play a large part. Besides, surely kids that have social troubles can read, or entertain themselves in other ways than watching television?

Some studies can be awfully silly, though. I remember one that concluded watching television had a correlation with autism. Rather than study how much television was watched, they used the records of when it rained in their area... As if people only watch television when it rains! (Another study used this study (the rain numbers) to conclude that there is a correlation between vitamin D deficiency and autism, which seems like it might at least have some merit)



Tracker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 933
Location: Behind your mineral line

05 May 2010, 1:09 pm

The correlation could likely be due to parental influence.

Active parents spend time with their kids, thus the kids watch less TV, and get better help with education

Passive parents spend less time with their kids, thus the kids watch more TV, and also get less help with school.

The difference is the participation by the parents in their child's life, not the amount of time they watch TV.



Wedge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 984
Location: Rendezvous Point

05 May 2010, 5:09 pm

Willard wrote:
Did it not occur to these rocket scientists that the kids end up sitting in front of the television so much BECAUSE they have difficulties developing social skills? :roll:


If these kids have problems in developing social skills they should be practising these skills instead of staying at home watching television. The first years of life are important for development and children should practice activities that promote proper development (talking, playing, singing, and reading together etc...).
Sorry for the rant! :oops:



Last edited by Wedge on 05 May 2010, 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,527
Location: Stalag 13

05 May 2010, 5:19 pm

Television has been called the electronic babysitter, since the 1960s.


_________________
Who wants to adopt a Sweet Pea?


CanadianRose
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 564
Location: Canada

05 May 2010, 6:52 pm

I've got a bit to say on this topic...

Firstly, I am an adult (late 30's) who has autistic traits. I have a son (now five) who is formally diagnosed with PDD-NOS.

I watched a lot of tv in the late 1970's/early 1980's (my childhood years). I did not have the social attitude of my older NT sister. Yep - sometimes mum just parked me there - I was quiet this way and not in the way. Even though I did not like socializing the way other NT kids do - watching this much tv was not good. I DID snack more (and still have a weight problem). I DIDN'T exercise or engage in any physical activity. I DIDN'T develop other skills which may have served me (and my community) well.

There are other activities which require the brain to be much more active than the very passive non-activity of watching tv. Reading is also a solitary, sedentary pursuit - but much more of the brain is being used. Music (playing an instrument or singing) is an excellent activity which will help a person with academics AND socializing eventually. Other activities could be arts/crafts, sports/activities/exercise - anything from shooting baskets to jumping rope. Heck, even when my own child lines up the chairs - he is at least getting some movement and gross motor activity!

I have a "no tv" policy in my home. My daughter (age 3) is NT. Right now she is sitting on the couch, looking through one of her many books and making up a story based on the pictures. My son is sweeping the floor and talking about various things as he is doing it. Sometimes they play together and giggle as they tickle each other. If they were watching tv - they would be silently sitting and not interacting at all.

If anyone has a child or children - I would definately recommend trying to go tv free. I'll be honest - it took my kids one month to get to the point where they don't even bother asking for tv anymore. I had to spend a lot of time reading stories, doing crafts, taking them to the playground, playing simple board games, etc. etc. Sometimes I was dead tired and really just wanted a break - but I persevered for a little over a month. Now the kids actually spend time entertaining THEMSELVES. I still enjoy playing games, reading, going to the playground with them, etc. It's fun for all of us and keeps us all active.

My son may not be a social butterfly like an NT kid. However, he can learn to develop his own interests and skills. He can learn to play an instrument (if he is interested), he can read, he can write stories/poetry, he can make model airplanes, he can garden, he can paint, he can knit or can do things that will give him skills and interests so that he CAN socialize, even in a limited capacity, with others in the community (e.g. choirs/band, reading clubs, gardening clubs, etc.)

Incidently, Vancouver Coastal Health (our public health authority which licenses hospital, long term care, and family health in south/west British Columbia) has an excellent educational brochure regarding TV watching and Children. You can view this for free at

http://vch.eduhealth.ca

Enter "Television and the Young Child" in the search section and it will bring you to the brochure which can be downloaded.

If I could change one thing about my childhood - it would be that my parents spent more time with me (playing games, going to the park, etc). I also wish that they had a "no tv" rule so that I would have developed more interests. I will never be a "party person" and socialize like NT's usually do - but I would have liked to have skills which I could enjoy and share with others and had been better academically.



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,205
Location: Pacific Northwest

05 May 2010, 7:14 pm

I hardly watched TV as a toddler and I didn't watch many shows growing up. I didn't start watching lot of TV till I got to my teens.

And I still struggled in school and with people and my social skills were still underdeveloped.



nostromo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,320
Location: At Festively Plump

05 May 2010, 7:16 pm

I sometimes wonder if I'm the only parent of a young kid that has no interest in TV. He used to watch Thomas on there he seems to understand TV as he would get scared when Toby got washed away in the flood etc. But just as often he would simply get up close with his nose pressed to it and watch the scan lines.

But now, little interest. Sometimes I put it on to give me 5 minutes, but it only holds his interest for about 45 seconds no matter what is on so it's pointless. It's not like he does a lot else though.



pumibel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,477

05 May 2010, 8:51 pm

I rarely watched TV as a kid and almost never in my early adult years. I have ADHD and possibly AS. My daughter seems to be NT and she has grown up with varying amounts of TV. Thing is, she has a balance of reading, TV, electronics like her Nintendo DSi, and riding her bike and playing outside. She loves the TV and has always been a TV kid. I admit to using TV as a babysitter for short spurts. I was a single mom who worked full time and took classes online, and there was a little time each night where I needed to get some work done before she went to bed. I did it a little more on the weekends to get my papers done and stuff like that. I am not really ashamed of that. Now, at age 11, she wants me to leave her alone to watch her shows sometimes.

edit to add: My daughter had always been in the 95 percentile for her height and 50 percentile for weight. She was a big baby- almost 10 lbs at birth. Now at 11 she is already 5'3" and skinny, so I don't think she is representative of this study anyway. I never shoved snacks down her to keep her happy- in fact I have always cooked. There has to be balance!

edit again: My daughter also had great social skills from babyhood. I had her in day care from age 6 weeks old because I was single in the military. It helped her become socialized.



pensieve
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,204
Location: Sydney, Australia

06 May 2010, 2:04 am

I had no interest in friends. I didn't even know what social skills were. I could hardly read picture books and I did enjoy a lot of children's shows. They don't make em like they did in my day.
I wasn't over weight. I didn't know anything about nutrition. By the age of 10 I made my own lunches and did prefer sugary snacks over sandwiches. I hated eating sandwiches at school because they got all squishy.
I was a little explorer of my surrounding area. I always wandered off on my family. Constantly heard my name being shouted by my panicking mother. I think TV or at least movies shaped my imagination and made me a good story teller. I learnt a lot from sitcoms too. They were my social skills education.


_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/


anxiety25
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Aug 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 820

06 May 2010, 9:23 am

Michael_Stuart wrote:
Some studies can be awfully silly, though. I remember one that concluded watching television had a correlation with autism. Rather than study how much television was watched, they used the records of when it rained in their area... As if people only watch television when it rains! (Another study used this study (the rain numbers) to conclude that there is a correlation between vitamin D deficiency and autism, which seems like it might at least have some merit)


lololol! I remember one very similar. It was actually blaming the RAIN though. Said that kids have to stay indoors and are forced to not socialize in areas with a lot of rain. Television watching was definitely brought up in that one. So they concluded that autism has a higher prevalence in areas with a lot of rain.

Then... my question on that television one you mentioned, would not only be "do they think people only watch TV when it rains?" but ALSO "did it ever occur to you people that the parents might turn on the TV to watch for severe weather warnings and storms?"


_________________
Sorry about the incredibly long post...

"I enjoyed the meetings, too. It was like having friends." -Luna Lovegood