autistic supremacy and radical feminism: both idiotic

Post Reply New Topic

I think that the people who think WrongPlanet is a “hate site” are just taking quotes out of context, but I still hate autistic supremacy because I think it is bad for autistic people. I’ve also noticed that it has a lot in common with another ideology I hate: radical feminism. Therefore I will diss them together.

First of all, autistic supremacy and radical feminism both make healthy use of massive hyperbole. I once caught a user on Aspies For Freedom calling People with Aspergers a “master race” and he thought that aspies were better than NTs at basically everything. I am reminded of that c*** Valerie Solanas when she said “The male chromosome is incomplete. All men are walking abortions.”

Second, autistic supremacy and radical feminism both are too easily offended. I don’t care that the Nostalgia Critic made jokes about autism. Also, some of the things I have seen on Aspies For Freedom against Encyclopaedia Dramatica are just dumb and embarrassing. I hate ED too, that’s why I don’t read it. Radical feminism also has this problem. They think porn should be banned (that would cause riots), they hate Guitar Hero 3, they hate surrealist art, they hate Andy Warhol, they hate feminists who aren’t as extreme as they are, they hate everything except their cats.

Third, autistic supremacists and radical feminists will often exaggerate how much the group they claim to represent has played a positive role in history. Autistic supremacists will gladly claim that Einstein or Newton or James Joyce had autism. It is true that those people have been speculated to have had autism by some people but Adolf Hitler and Ted Kaczynski are also speculated to have/ have had autism. Don’t start diagnosing historical figures with autism unless you’re willing to allow some not-so-likable historical figures to join too. Also, if Hitler and Kaczynski had autism that says nothing about you. Also, don’t feel too bad about having the same condition as Kaczynski. I actually agree with a lot of what he said about liberal psychology and how modern society defines mental disorder.

Radical feminism has also given us gems like “behind every successful man there is a woman.” Do you want me to name a man who is well liked today despite never getting married?

JESUS

That pretty much wraps up that one doesn’t it?

Fourth, both autistic supremacy and radical feminism both think that the problems of the world could be solved just by making the government entirely made up of the people who they claim to represent. I actually don’t think a government of entirely high-functioning-autistics would be too much different from the current one and I think a woman-only government wouldn’t be too different either. Everyone, regardless of gender or neurology, is capable of becoming power mad and if you disagree you are naive. The idea that creating a government made up of a different sort of people will solve everything is idiotic and dangerous. Catherine de’ Medici is proof that women can be cruel tyrants. Also, would an all-woman government necessarily care much more about female proletarians than the current one? Look at Sarah Palin! I ask autistic supremacists to consider how many self-hating autistics would be in an all-autistic government.

Fifth, both autistic supremacists and radical feminists sometimes have a morbid and unpleasant fascination with the thought of killing off anyone who isn’t in the group they claim to represent. I think an all-high-functioning-autistic world would be little different from the current one but an all-female world would be a disaster. In such a world, reproduction would be theoretically done using artificial sperm. How is the government supposed to prevent people from illegally creating artificial y-sperm? The government would need to have FULL control over reproductive technology and would need to be totalitarian in nature to prevent the illegal creation of y-sperm. If you think the government would exercise this power responsibly then you are naive. Thay would create nothing less than a Brave New World dictatorship and would use their utter control over reproductive technology to genetically engineer people any way they wanted. Careful what you wish for feminazis. How ironic – they claim to fight patriarchal oppression and yet they are unknowingly supporting what would cause the greatest tyranny ever.

Sixth, both autistic supremacists and radical feminists just believe what they do because they’ve been through bad experiences. I was bullied in high school by NTs but I don’t let it get to me. My mother – who I have a good relationship with – is NT and most of my favorite YouTube users are NT. Only one YouTube user who I have significant respect for - JordanOwen42 - is autistic. A lot of radical feminists probably have been sexually assaulted or abused by men in the past but that gives them no right to say what they say about men in general because that includes me and a lot of other men who have done nothing to harm a radical feminist in our lives. My younger sister is a passive-aggressive psychopath and liar who gets way too much sympathy from my parents, my father’s mother is a batsh** crazy control freak who everyone hates and I was rejected by every girl in high school. If I said bad things about women in general - even if those were my reasons - most people would think I was an a$$face and a misogynist and some people would think I was gay. I know there are plenty of decent women in the world and I have met some of them here on WrongPlanet. I bet my sister likes to bully a lot of decent women until they develop eating disorders.

Seventh, I would like to point out that autistic supremacy and radical feminism both share traits with a third thing – antisemitism. Autistic supremacists think the government is messed up because it is full of NTs, feminists think it is messed up because it is full of men and antisemites think it is messed up because (at least they think) it is controlled by Jews. As an anarchist, I believe the government would be corrupt and messed up no matter who was running it.



Final word: I just know some people are going to call me misogynistic for what I have said here. For your information I support affirmative action for women, I am fully 100% pro-choice, I have had some pleasant discussions with some female members here and I think actual misogynists like George “Maddox” Ouzounian and Dave Sim are A$$faces, so go to hell.

I get off when people make up stories about my life and what I think, really, I do.


What's next?

"Christians and Their Art of Doctor Killing?

Last edited by Bethie on 16 Sep 2010, 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Technically, I think it was just Valerie Solanis who hated surrealist art and Andy Warhol (and I think any negative feelings she had about art were just from hating Andy Warhol).




I think that this and shared negative experiences are the core similarities. Both groups have suffered discrimination and have combined over-generalization and black/white thinking to come to the conclusion that all members of their group are Good, all members of the other group are Evil, and all problems can be solved by eliminating the other group.

Luckily, such catastrophic over-generalization and black/white thinking isn't terribly common so these groups remain fringe within the larger sub-groups they claim to represent. I'm a centrist/moderate with the belief that all humans are born with the capacity to cause harm and also to alleviate harm (I worded it that way rather than the usual good/evil because you can cause harm without going fully evil). I believe in societal tweaks to bring about positive change, rather than seeing an entire group as an enemy to be vanquished.

Sorry to highlight just that but holly feck This chick and Sodini would have made a lovely couple

Otherwise of course I agree with you on both points.