Charities alarmed as autistic man is hit by Asbo

Page 1 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

agmoie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 333
Location: Britain

stuckinthedesert
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: California

23 Jun 2006, 5:54 pm

WoW. Anti-social Behavior Order never heard of such a thing. Sounds like a totalitarian dictate instead of a legal procedure. This amazes me that any civilized country would try to restrict a persons legal, although mildly disturbing, behavior.

Furthermore it shocks me that they are so blatantly ignoring the uncontrollable processes of autism. What’s next arresting people with Tourett’s syndrome just because they yell in a movie theatre?


_________________
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."


Aeturnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 842

23 Jun 2006, 7:02 pm

There's no such thing as ASBOs here in the United States. I'm sort of shocked something like that hasn't been concocted by the current administration.

That happened in England, it appears. So, it doesn't exactly shock me. I've never heard of anything like that before.

- Ray M -



Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

23 Jun 2006, 7:13 pm

Aeturnus wrote:
There's no such thing as ASBOs here in the United States. I'm sort of shocked something like that hasn't been concocted by the current administration.

That happened in England, it appears. So, it doesn't exactly shock me. I've never heard of anything like that before.

- Ray M -


I hope no one gives them any ideas.



lowfreq50
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,536
Location: Gainesville, Florida

23 Jun 2006, 8:06 pm

"The order also bans him from hitting people, . . . and damaging property."

Don't you think we are all already "banned" from hitting people and damaging property? C'mon people, that is criminal behavior! And inappropriate touching can be considered assult or sexual harrassment (depending on how the person touched interprets it).

We can't us AS as an excuse for such extreme behavior.



wobbegong
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 718

23 Jun 2006, 9:58 pm

How bizarre.

How confusing for the guy to get a "temporary" order. I thought this kind of thing should be permanent. He shouldn't get the idea that when court order expires that it's ok to go do all those things again.

I'm not sure that it is worthy of putting him in jail, but he really needs to understand that good social behaviour requires he never do those things in public, and if he wants to do some of them in private he needs to ask and receive permission first.

I'm surprised that the therapy group has no effect or that the court order would have an effect.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,527
Location: Stalag 13

23 Jun 2006, 11:53 pm

What's Asbos?



Aeturnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 842

24 Jun 2006, 2:06 am

lowfreq50 wrote:
"The order also bans him from hitting people, . . . and damaging property."

Don't you think we are all already "banned" from hitting people and damaging property? C'mon people, that is criminal behavior! And inappropriate touching can be considered assult or sexual harrassment (depending on how the person touched interprets it).

We can't us AS as an excuse for such extreme behavior.


Well, it's not really about using AS as an excuse for extreme behavior. Surely, we can't use AS as an excuse for such behavior, but a law like this is based on the idea that people are inherently out of control, that somehow people need to be kept in line. This is what creates paranoia in a country, and in the United States, the fears of crime are almost irrational, since the crime rate has actually dropped over the last decade. Yet, we keep on pushing for harder and harder things to control crime, so much so that now things are caught on surveillance. If you are resting in a place that is deemed suspicious, the authorities can walk right up to you and try to coax you into hitting them or running away, e.g. not leaving you alone by consistently asking whether or not you were trying to do anything suspicious or whatever. I am not saying this happens a lot, but it does happen, especially if you fit the profile for someone who might be suspicious, e.g. you have long hair, you are black, whatever.

- Ray M -



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

24 Jun 2006, 2:22 am

Quote:
ASBO (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASBO)

"In the United Kingdom an Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO (pronounced az-bo)) is a civil order made against a person who has been shown to have engaged in conduct which caused or was likely to cause alarm, harassment or distress to one or more persons not of the same household as himself (or herself) and where an ASBO is necessary to protect relevant persons from further anti-social acts by the Defendant.[1] In England and Wales they are issued by Magistrates' Courts, and in Scotland by the Sheriff Courts. It was introduced by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998."


So, there you go. It's a civil order - there's no proper criminal trial or anything. And ASBOs have been misused against people with disabilities, 'sarcastic' people, people riding a bike, a woman trying to commit suicide, and so on.



emp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,002

24 Jun 2006, 3:05 am

Quote:
The order also bans him from hitting people, saying inappropriate things and damaging property.


I would put him in jail if he continued hitting people and damaging property.



Zamzara
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 46

24 Jun 2006, 5:28 am

emp wrote:
Quote:
The order also bans him from hitting people, saying inappropriate things and damaging property.


I would put him in jail if he continued hitting people and damaging property.


The problem with using an ASBO to do it is that it appears to be a way to bypass the right to a trial, or any of the other usual safeguards against being wrongly convicted. Guilt is decided on balance of probability.



walk-in-the-rain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 928

24 Jun 2006, 1:45 pm

Also - there was a study done in schools that showed a number of kids being diagnosed with AS when they should have been diagnosed with autism because there were speech and language delays. However, Asperger's "sounds" better to kids and parents than if someone were to say "autistic" but that should not be the basis for an innacurate diagnosis. The reason that I am pointing this out is NOT that people with autism are more prone to violence BUT - my son has HFA and has significant expressive and receptive language delays. So inability to communicate effectively can lead people to be frustrated and lash out. And inability to understand language can make people appear like they are being disruptive or defiant when they may be oblivious to the demands being made on them. This does not have anything to do with IQ as a person can be very smart but have difficulties bridging that communication gap.

With some of these stories about people with AS - could it be that they have more to deal with that is not being addressed. And laws like this and the attitude of some of the Asperger's community to back away from people like this could also lead to misunderstandings that there are no difficulties for anyone on the spectrum that they can not overcome simply by willpower.



Iammeandnooneelse
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 380

25 Jun 2006, 6:24 am

Hitting is one thing but what are inappropiate things?



danlo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,079
Location: Western Australia

25 Jun 2006, 8:53 am

This is old news. The first occurence of this type of ASBO enforcement actually included a Tourette's child being issued with an ASBO against shouting out obscenities. Another ASBO was placed on a child who squealed too loud whilst on a trampoline in his backyard, because the sounds he was making was annoying the neighbours. It was only a matter of time before an autistic was hit by one. As lowfreq50 said, it might be appropriate for some autistic behaviours, but there are many that might call for an ASBO with normal people, where it is not appropriate to issue one for an autistic. For example, an autistic child being unable to endure their clothing stripping off naked in public. How can anyone in their reasonable mind issue an ASBO for cases like that? Someone who is deliberately mooning the public for actually anti-social reasons we could condone and support.


_________________
"Hitting bottom isn't a weekend retreat, it isn't a goddamned seminar. Stop trying to control everything and just let go!"


agmoie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 333
Location: Britain

26 Jun 2006, 4:33 pm

Aspies getting ASBOs may be old news but each case is worth examining.Civil liberties have been greatly eroded in the UK.Unless we expose the idiocy of giving Aspergers people ASBOs for staring for instance,it will just go on...



Iammeandnooneelse
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 380

26 Jun 2006, 4:51 pm

agmoeie, any bright ideas for ways minors can help?