08 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm
You are both right. It is quite controlled, but at the moment it is still more or less an open platform. Step by step, the government is changing that for the wore.
Thanks for the info about who actually owns it by the way.
_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here>
09 Jan 2011, 9:36 am
09 Jan 2011, 9:48 am
Google has done more than any other entity in the world to destroy any vestige of individual privacy and their systems are dedicated more to data mining and pattern matching than just being a "search engine." That alone makes them a valued CIA asset because the Constitution impedes the CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, etc. from digging into your life without a warrant but those restrictions DO NOT apply to businesses. So long as Google is willing to sell their findings to anyone who wants to buy it, there are no constitutional restrictions on the CIA using data mined by Google to profile your life.
Add in how Google is actively filtering out results so that search results go to preferred vendors and some results are just flat out repressed, and they can also be a tool to restrict free speech on the Internet via corporate policy and not governmental degree...even if in the background they are one and the same.
i think you are likely to be right you know.
google is more or less owned by the Rothschilds. The same family which pretty much runs all the major meida outlets and corporations. It is facism what they have created in my opinion.
_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here>
09 Jan 2011, 11:17 am
09 Jan 2011, 12:10 pm
Google/Youtube is well controlled.
That's right. Blame it on the Jews.
ruveyn
In all honestly it is very little to do with the Jews now. The whole Jew thing is often just a front for hiding the Illuminati's Lucifarian religion (note that satan and lucifer are technically two different beings. If they are really being that is)
_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here>
10 Jan 2011, 9:44 am
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
10 Jan 2011, 10:00 am
10 Jan 2011, 10:13 am
Tollorin
Veteran
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
11 Jan 2011, 12:21 am
11 Jan 2011, 7:29 am
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 am
11 Jan 2011, 9:44 am
I am having a think about that is in those videos. I am going to link those videos to a few friends of mines who are lot more knowledgeable than me and who I know examine both sides of the evidence very carefully.
I noticed a couple assumptions though. It seems to assume that all the conspiracy theories believe that the steel melted. It also seems to assume that the equipment used, IF it was used, would have been "standard" and have remains found. Lets say it was used for one second. If it was used, the precaution would be taken to to make a more 'light weight' version of all the components. I do remember looking at how the design of a thermite and thermate box can make the sound a lot quieter. Also have to note that IF explosives were used at the top and muffled, the further down it gets, the less explosive force which would need to bring the next floor down due to force of the floors above "helping" to collapse the buildings.
These are my own educated guesses about each aspect. I will really look the details more closely and get back you you's.
_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here>
11 Jan 2011, 3:09 pm
