Rabbis warn Rupert Murdoch

Post Reply New Topic

Yeah it was, if you were a Judge you can't force a prosecutor to try a case before a suspect is even arrested yet, furthermore the man admitted to being a collaborator and said he enjoyed it.

The fact he doesn't is troubling because it indicates he lacks feelings for others, or he is plain sadistic, does that break it down for you.

....

The fact he doesn't feel bad about it years later, that is kind of disturbing. Also I've found liberals only have compassion for people when it benefits themselves.

....

Riiiggghhhhttt... Except for the fact Soros publicly admitted he helped them and considered it one of the most enjoyable years of his life, he enjoyed it, that should give one pause right there.

....

It looks more like he doesn't care, the fact he doesn't have remorse is as though he dehumanized the people he helped send to Concentration Camps (probably explains his attacks on Israel as well).

Only a twisted fascist would obsess over the perceived lack of guilt of a Jewish holocaust survivor, and continue to hold it against him. And, yes, I am comparing you and Glenn Beck to Hitler, because the three of you are "way out of line."

You know, it's people like you that have made it so being called a racist doesn't mean anything, another sad thing is you look to be trying to do the same thing with anti-semetism. The really sad thing is when people have to report racism now, nobody believes them anymore because everyone has come to associate it with just being someone a liberal disagrees with and thus wants to smear.

As I recall, it's conservatives who have taken to calling their opponents "Hitler," "fascists," and "Nazis" in recent years.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Last I checked Scott Walker was a Republican whom was called Hitler by Unions.

Here's a tip. If you want to use the word "whom", then rephrase the phrase thus:

"...a Republican whom Unions called Hitler."

Otherwise, you should use the word "who."

You have issues, can you be any more obsessive compulsive on grammar usage.

Last I checked Scott Walker was a Republican whom was called Hitler by Unions.

How about "vile fu**ing a$$hole?"

No, they shouldn't have called him Hitler - when f***ing as*hole is more than enough.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

So pointing out the entitlements and standing up for the general public against a union makes someone an a-hole, looks to me like you aren't being rational.

As a matter of fact, most of the public support the unions these days against Governor as*hole.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

It takes a lot to pry most American Jews away from their traditional loyalty to the Democratic Party. But give Barack Obama credit. In just two and a half years in office, he has managed to achieve just that. Though the rumblings about Jewish unhappiness with the president’s policy of pressure against Israel have been getting more noticeable with each fight the administration picks with the Jewish state, the last month has been the worst yet. And, as Politico reports today, the cracks in the heretofore solidly partisan wall of Jewish support for the Democrats are starting to widen.

The Politico feature largely concentrates on interviews done with Jewish Dems in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, and what Ben Smith heard can’t be encouraging for Obama supporters. Fundraising is being affected with even those organizing pro-Obama events admitting to Politico they won’t meet their goals. The open talk of defection to the Republicans next year is getting loud enough that even the most rabidly partisan Democrats have been forced to take notice. Though they claim most Jews will never vote for a Republican, the dissatisfaction with Obama is no longer confined to the right. Even liberal Jews are starting to question why the president seems more inclined to get tough with America’s ally than with foes such as Syria.

The response from pro-Obama Democrats is, the president’s policies have been portrayed unfairly. They claim if the situation is properly explained to voters and donors, they will be reassured. But such reassurance is not coming easily. Though a minority of Democrats might be sympathetic to the idea Israel must be pressured to make peace for its own good, even most liberals understand the Jewish state has spent the last two decades making concessions and peace offers in vain. They know the obstacle to peace is the refusal of the Palestinians to take yes for an answer.

The spin about Obama showing Israel “tough love” isn’t convincing people primarily because, unlike Democratic leaders of the past whose affection for Israel was not doubted, many Jews have been forced to come to the conclusion the president simply does not have the same warm feelings for Israel most Americans share.

Democrats are right to mock Jewish Republicans who predict a shift in Jewish voting patterns every four years. But the problem the Democrats face doesn’t stem from the fact the GOP has become a pro-Israel stronghold. The threat to the Democrats’ stranglehold on the Jewish vote comes from their own party’s leader.

It bears repeating the record 40 percent of the Jewish vote Ronald Reagan garnered in 1980 had more to do with Jimmy Carter’s hostility to Israel than his own appeal.