Page 1 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Altruism As A Standing Order For All Human Beings?
Yes 45%  45%  [ 5 ]
No 36%  36%  [ 4 ]
What the 'ell is altruism? 18%  18%  [ 2 ]
I am too young to vote. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Well, Mama once said something about a box of choclates ... 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 11

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm

1) Altruism should be the standing order for all human beings.

2) No human being/s should ever demand or impose altruism.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

23 Feb 2011, 2:18 pm

True "altruism," wherever it exists, is delusional and self-destructive.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

23 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm

Altruism to a small extent is essential to co-existing with other people, but I don't believe it is down to the extent left wingers consider ideal. So I dunno whether to vote no or yes...



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

23 Feb 2011, 2:37 pm

Sharing of resources and providing for peoples needs is necessary to one degree or another for any society. Otherwise there will be anarchy and violence. Groups generally figure it out when they're getting the short end of the stick and start making a fuss. What you call altruism is entirely a matter of semantics.

While the Utopian aims of Marxist Socialism have been a failure for the most part, at this point Randroid Social Darwinist Dystopias only exist in hell.



Last edited by marshall on 23 Feb 2011, 2:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 2:37 pm

Orwell wrote:
True "altruism," wherever it exists, is delusional and self-destructive.

So then, you would/might say there should only be one related "standing order" ...

2) No human being/s should ever demand or impose altruism.

We agree!


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Feb 2011, 2:39 pm

I think the idea that altruism is somehow self-defeating is a reflection of the laziness of (the majority of) modern man in relation to his interest in helping others. Randroids are all just really, really lazy, not evil.


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 2:39 pm

Ah. I just now caught the conflict between this thread's title and its poll.

Oops.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

23 Feb 2011, 2:42 pm

Vigilans wrote:
I think the idea that altruism is somehow self-defeating is a reflection of the laziness of (the majority of) modern man in relation to his interest in helping others. Randroids are all just really, really lazy, not evil.
Yeah it's not necessarily self defeating if kept to a small scale, but make it too big and you have the weight of the world on your shoulders as well as a big portion of the fruits of your labour being handed out to people who should've worked for it. I'm for a safety net, but I'm not for a safety net being used as a hammock.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

23 Feb 2011, 2:50 pm

Vigilans wrote:
I think the idea that altruism is somehow self-defeating is a reflection of the laziness of (the majority of) modern man in relation to his interest in helping others. Randroids are all just really, really lazy, not evil.

Recognizing your own interest in helping others is not "altruism." It is sanity.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm

Orwell wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
I think the idea that altruism is somehow self-defeating is a reflection of the laziness of (the majority of) modern man in relation to his interest in helping others. Randroids are all just really, really lazy, not evil.

Recognizing your own interest in helping others is not "altruism." It is sanity.


That's a good point. I often proscribe to the idea that 'to be totally selfless makes one worthless'. Which perhaps sounds a tad harsh, but self-interest is important. Prioritizing self-interest can often lead to better ways of helping others in the long term


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 2:54 pm

AceOfSpades wrote:
... the weight of the world on your shoulders as well as a big portion of the fruits of your labour being handed out to people who should've worked for it ...

Not if/when altruism is only practiced among or is restricted to those who practice altruism ...

... and that begs the question of the goodness or rightness of having it as the standing order for all human beings.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

23 Feb 2011, 3:22 pm

leejosepho wrote:
1) Altruism should be the standing order for all human beings.

2) No human being/s should ever demand or impose altruism.


I MUCH prefer the MYOB code:

1 You must not offend others

2 If you are the other, you must not be too easily offended,

Equally impractical, but you can see that for a different race it could conceivably work.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

23 Feb 2011, 3:22 pm

leejosepho wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
... the weight of the world on your shoulders as well as a big portion of the fruits of your labour being handed out to people who should've worked for it ...

Not if/when altruism is only practiced among or is restricted to those who practice altruism ...

... and that begs the question of the goodness or rightness of having it as the standing order for all human beings.
That's the point hence the "I'm not for a safety net being used as a hammock".

Orwell wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
I think the idea that altruism is somehow self-defeating is a reflection of the laziness of (the majority of) modern man in relation to his interest in helping others. Randroids are all just really, really lazy, not evil.

Recognizing your own interest in helping others is not "altruism." It is sanity.
I believe altruism is intrinsically rewarding so it doesn't always have to involve your own interest. I think it comes down to appreciation rather than opportunism.



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 3:26 pm

Philologos wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
1) Altruism should be the standing order for all human beings.

2) No human being/s should ever demand or impose altruism.


I MUCH prefer the MYOB code:

1 You must not offend others

2 If you are the other, you must not be too easily offended,

Equally impractical, but you can see that for a different race it could conceivably work.

Great minds think alike, and that fits well with a present thought for a new thread ...


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Feb 2011, 3:28 pm

Philologos wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
1) Altruism should be the standing order for all human beings.

2) No human being/s should ever demand or impose altruism.


I MUCH prefer the MYOB code:

1 You must not offend others

2 If you are the other, you must not be too easily offended,

Equally impractical, but you can see that for a different race it could conceivably work.


Be conservative in what you do; be liberal in what you accept from others? 8)


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

23 Feb 2011, 3:39 pm

Vigilans wrote:
Philologos wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
1) Altruism should be the standing order for all human beings.

2) No human being/s should ever demand or impose altruism.


I MUCH prefer the MYOB code:

1 You must not offend others

2 If you are the other, you must not be too easily offended,

Equally impractical, but you can see that for a different race it could conceivably work.


Be conservative in what you do; be liberal in what you accept from others? 8)


I could buy into that restatement and even hold back from lexical nitpicking for five minutes.

It is, franlly, how I TRY to live, though I am not THAT far from human.