Dox47 wrote:
At least to me, words like "white trash", "hillbilly" and "redneck" fall more into the category of classist rather than racist, in the same vein as calling something "ghetto". I don't really have too much of a problem with them until they're used by people who want to make a big stink about other people using similar terms for poor cultures within other races, then it becomes hypocritical. I've actually had someone jump all over me for having described a bad deal as getting "gypped" for example, so it would be hypocritical for that person to turn around and use white trash or redneck as a descriptor. For general use though I think they're OK.
I was just about to post "more classist than racist" and then clicked the next page and you've already done it. As a middle class white person, this term has always really bothered me. It's always used in the context of "look at those ridiculous poor people". It is most gruesomely hypocritical when I've heard fellow white middle class liberals (yes, I'm a liberal
) use it to mock the cars and clothes of poor white people (they don't have much money so they buy cheap clothes- how strange!) but get irate at others who use "ghetto" to mock the cars and clothes of poor black people.
The cruel subtext is that somehow the poor white people actually deserve their poverty (since they haven't taken advantage of the advantages of being white in America) and since it's their choice to be poor (they should have gone to University like the rest of us white middle class liberals) it's ok to mock them. Blech! I used to get into a lot of dorm arguments on this topic. Mocking "white trash" people was sport at the college I went to (for which it was hardly unique, I think).