This is actually a pretty interesting NY Times article about a professor who gave extracurricular demonstrations of human sexuality for his class. They weren't required for students to attend, nor were they tested on the demonstrations. I think it's an interesting debate as to what is 'right' to teach, or what way is right to teach. I would condemn it if he gave access to minors, but if he didn't use himself, his students, or anything illegal (assuming he didn't ), what is the difference between what he was allowing to be demonstrated and, say, nude models for art classes? I'm not really sure what to think, but I'm curious as to what others think (as long as it, of course, doesn't belong in the Adult forum, but I guess someone could make a thread there too). Anyways, here's the article:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/article?a=753514&f=21
_________________
I'm 24 years old and live in WA State. I was diagnosed with Asperger's at 9. I received a BS in Psychology in 2011 and I intend to help people with Autistic Spectrum Disorders, either through research, application, or both. On the ?Pursuit of Aspieness?.