Page 7 of 7 [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7


Come June 10, would you vote for a leftwing secularist above a radical right-libertarian to be WP's Most Strident Atheist given that radical right-libertarian policies lead to low levels of atheism?
I would vote for the leftwing secularist! 55%  55%  [ 18 ]
No, I would vote for the religion helping, self-hating atheist right-libertarian. 15%  15%  [ 5 ]
None of the above 30%  30%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 33

sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

19 Apr 2011, 9:13 am

NobelCynic wrote:
I see here that Fnord has been unbanned. If nominations are still being accepted, he should be considered.


Fnord does exist! topic

Fnord is back? (Maybe his account? :twisted: )

But where are 91, Sand, Waltur, among others too numerous to mention? Have not seen them for some time.

Is there a list of candidates for Most Strident Atheist? I might have meissed a few pages i was reviewing.


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


loftyD
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 64

19 Apr 2011, 10:20 am

can i nominate myself. I am a deviant Atheist :) ahaha. :)



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

19 Apr 2011, 3:15 pm

NobelCynic wrote:
Fnord has been unbanned.

Evidence, please?


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

19 Apr 2011, 3:19 pm

Orwell wrote:
NobelCynic wrote:
Fnord has been unbanned.

Evidence, please?


It's true, I saw a post by him yesterday though I can't recall what thread it was in.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

19 Apr 2011, 3:28 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
NobelCynic wrote:
Fnord has been unbanned.

Evidence, please?


It's true, I saw a post by him yesterday though I can't recall what thread it was in.

I know, Cynic linked to the post. I just miss Fnord's catchphrase.

I wasn't aware Fnord had been banned, actually.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

19 Apr 2011, 3:32 pm

NobelCynic wrote:
I see here that Fnord has been unbanned. If nominations are still being accepted, he should be considered.



Fnord was never banned, you just couldn't see him.



now to explain the joke since most people haven't read the book:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord

"In these novels, the interjection "fnord" is given hypnotic power over the unenlightened. Under the Illuminati program, children in grade school are taught to be unable to consciously see the word "fnord". For the rest of their lives, every appearance of the word subconsciously generates a feeling of uneasiness and confusion, and prevents rational consideration of the subject. This results in a perpetual low-grade state of fear in the populace. The government acts on the premise that a fearful populace keeps them in power."


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

19 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm

Orwell wrote:
I wasn't aware Fnord had been banned, actually.


Really? His banning was one of the greatest sins of the old moderation regime, especially since it reportedly came about after a PM argument with one of the mods. Sort of ironic that you didn't know, since he just disappeared and no one was allowed to talk about him because of that positively Orwellian rule. :lol:

Apparently there were complaints that he was too aggressive in questioning the assumptions of the faithful...

Actually I'm kind of surprised it took him this long to get back, I mean it only took me a few months.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

19 Apr 2011, 3:59 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Apparently there were complaints that he was too aggressive in questioning the assumptions of the faithful...

Yeah, but I don't think that never qualified as a reason for banning, did it?

I thought that the reason may have been for problems with the Haven forum, as there were complains of he being aggresive towards posters from the Haven forum, but I really can't say for certain

Anyway, I'm glad he is back, now he can join the strident atheists.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

21 Apr 2011, 11:22 am

Dox47 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
I wasn't aware Fnord had been banned, actually.


Really? His banning was one of the greatest sins of the old moderation regime, especially since it reportedly came about after a PM argument with one of the mods. Sort of ironic that you didn't know, since he just disappeared and no one was allowed to talk about him because of that positively Orwellian rule. :lol:

Well, right, it's often hard to know if someone got banned or if they left the site of their own accord, precisely because of that silly rule.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

14 May 2011, 8:03 pm

Bethie wrote:
I intend to vote for a left wing secularist over any other individual,
in every election of any kind
for the rest of my life.


Although it's worth noting that I consider "right-libertarian" to be a giggle-worthy oxymoron.


Thanks for your endorsement.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/