Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Racial Identity in Politics

Page 8 of 10 [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

31 Mar 2011, 8:15 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.

they would have cute babies


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

31 Mar 2011, 8:19 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.



Evolution! Don't talk utter garbage. It's just skin colour! Why don't you just get over it! Everyone else has.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

31 Mar 2011, 8:22 pm

The only reasonable solution to the human rights crisis of displacement, Ghettoization, and martial rule over the Palestinian Peoples is a multicultural, secular, one-state solution. The two-state solution is bankrupt given the fact that Israeli settlements are well intertwined into "Palestinian" territory in the West Bank.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

31 Mar 2011, 8:24 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would a person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


NationalSocialist
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

31 Mar 2011, 8:28 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.



jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

31 Mar 2011, 8:32 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
The only reasonable solution to the human rights crisis of displacement, Ghettoization, and martial rule over the Palestinian Peoples is a multicultural, secular, one-state solution. The two-state solution is bankrupt given the fact that Israeli settlements are well intertwined into "Palestinian" territory in the West Bank.


ah good old one state. The traditional position of most of the radical Left! Also separating people into two states based on their race and religion is kind of an anti-left solution at heart. Kind of the like something that a national socialist would favour. I think we'll have trouble with the Zionists in trying to sell them one state though.



jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

31 Mar 2011, 8:34 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.


Oh yeah whilst we're getting indignant about genocide ever hear of something called the Holocaust? Thought not...



NationalSocialist
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

31 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm

jamieboy wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.


Oh yeah whilst we're getting indignant about genocide ever hear of something called the Holocaust? Thought not...


Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

31 Mar 2011, 8:40 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:

Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


While I'm certainly no defender of British Imperialism or recent UK Junior Partnerism with the American Empire, since Jamieboy is a member of Britian's radical socialist left I don't think he supports those things either.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

31 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.


Oh yeah whilst we're getting indignant about genocide ever hear of something called the Holocaust? Thought not...


Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


so is you is or is you ain't a nazi? wouldn't a better scheme for the homogenization as thus improvement of human relations be to have as many bi-racial babies as possible? if there are any sisters out there I am willing to do my part.
this seems to be alot more fun than moving folks around.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

31 Mar 2011, 8:49 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:

Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


While I'm certainly no defender of British Imperialism or recent UK Junior Partnerism with the American Empire, since Jamieboy is a member of Britian's radical socialist left I don't think he supports those things either.


I certainly don't. The empire enslaved a third of the world. A lot of it was race based actually "liberating the minds of savages" and the like. I'm suprised the Fascist doesn't support it on those grounds. I support a progressive, internationalist ethical foreign policy that favours aiding democrats and the labour movement as opposed to aiding dictators like Saddam Hussein or Mubarak. I am utterly opposed to realpolitik and i think war should be a last resort. Although sometimes war can be necessary as we saw in Spain in the thirties and again during world war 2. NO PASARAN!



NationalSocialist
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

31 Mar 2011, 8:52 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.


Oh yeah whilst we're getting indignant about genocide ever hear of something called the Holocaust? Thought not...


Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


so is you is or is you ain't a nazi? wouldn't a better scheme for the homogenization as thus improvement of human relations be to have as many bi-racial babies as possible? if there are any sisters out there I am willing to do my part.
this seems to be alot more fun than moving folks around.


I think people from all Nationalities should be proud of their ethnic, culture, heritage, language and do all they can to promote and embrace their unique make up, it's what makes the World an intersting place. It seems illogical to want every Nation on the planet to look the exact seem, it destoys the diversity of the planet.



NationalSocialist
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

31 Mar 2011, 8:56 pm

jamieboy wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:

Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


While I'm certainly no defender of British Imperialism or recent UK Junior Partnerism with the American Empire, since Jamieboy is a member of Britian's radical socialist left I don't think he supports those things either.


I certainly don't. The empire enslaved a third of the world. A lot of it was race based actually "liberating the minds of savages" and the like. I'm suprised the Fascist doesn't support it on those grounds. I support a progressive, internationalist ethical foreign policy that favours aiding democrats and the labour movement as opposed to aiding dictators like Saddam Hussein or Mubarak. I am utterly opposed to realpolitik and i think war should be a last resort. Although sometimes war can be necessary as we saw in Spain in the thirties and again during world war 2. NO PASARAN!


Yet you favour the British voting system that allows the 3 war/imperial parties to be totally unopposed in your fake democracy elections. :roll: You're a strange one.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

31 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.


Oh yeah whilst we're getting indignant about genocide ever hear of something called the Holocaust? Thought not...


Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


so is you is or is you ain't a nazi? wouldn't a better scheme for the homogenization as thus improvement of human relations be to have as many bi-racial babies as possible? if there are any sisters out there I am willing to do my part.
this seems to be alot more fun than moving folks around.


I think people from all Nationalities should be proud of their ethnic, culture, heritage, language and do all they can to promote and embrace their unique make up, it's what makes the World an intersting place. It seems illogical to want every Nation on the planet to look the exact seem, it destoys the diversity of the planet.


Have you read the Zapatista stuff? subcomander Marcos and all that.
They have a system of self-reliance and hope for "a world that contains all worlds"
without all the hateful baggage of national socialism.
ethnic and eco-diversity from an Anarchist viewpoint.
unless being a scary Nazi helps keep the monsters away at night.
:lol:


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

31 Mar 2011, 9:16 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
The only reason that National Socialist is in favour of arab nationalism is because he wants to divide and ghettoise the world on the basis of race. So he's in favour of all kinds of race based nationalisms. It also gives the nazi the chance to engage in jew baiting.



Yes, quite logically I prefer to respect why Nations carved out their own land in the first place and put borders up so as they could prosper in their own culture amongst their own people, it's simple evolution, not just for man either.

Perhaps you on the other hand would rather have a lion, a dog and a hamster all live in the same zoo cage together and expect them to prosper amongst themselves.


Jesus Christ, you're as bad as Codorac. Tell me, in you're segregationist world system, where would I person with Dene (Northern First Nation group), Ethnic German, Hungarian Gypsie, Red River Metis, and Greek lineage such as myself go?


A multicultural nation like America, that is what it was founded as after all, well after the British yet again committed genocide on the original inhabitants and replaced those people, something which of course we have come to expect from those Island Apes.


Oh yeah whilst we're getting indignant about genocide ever hear of something called the Holocaust? Thought not...


Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


so is you is or is you ain't a nazi? wouldn't a better scheme for the homogenization as thus improvement of human relations be to have as many bi-racial babies as possible? if there are any sisters out there I am willing to do my part.
this seems to be alot more fun than moving folks around.


I think people from all Nationalities should be proud of their ethnic, culture, heritage, language and do all they can to promote and embrace their unique make up, it's what makes the World an intersting place. It seems illogical to want every Nation on the planet to look the exact seem, it destoys the diversity of the planet.


BS. No one should be proud of something just because they're born to it. And something isn't inherantly a good thing just because it's a part of your own culture or heritage. My heritage? Imperialism! And i couldn't be any less proud of it. I'd rather listen to Public Enemy and Gang Starr whilst eating pizza. It's that or learn to play the lute and morris dance!



jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

31 Mar 2011, 9:22 pm

NationalSocialist wrote:
jamieboy wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
NationalSocialist wrote:

Which one? Is it the well over 1 million which have died in the holocaust caused by your ilk in Iraq?


While I'm certainly no defender of British Imperialism or recent UK Junior Partnerism with the American Empire, since Jamieboy is a member of Britian's radical socialist left I don't think he supports those things either.


I certainly don't. The empire enslaved a third of the world. A lot of it was race based actually "liberating the minds of savages" and the like. I'm suprised the Fascist doesn't support it on those grounds. I support a progressive, internationalist ethical foreign policy that favours aiding democrats and the labour movement as opposed to aiding dictators like Saddam Hussein or Mubarak. I am utterly opposed to realpolitik and i think war should be a last resort. Although sometimes war can be necessary as we saw in Spain in the thirties and again during world war 2. NO PASARAN!


Yet you favour the British voting system that allows the 3 war/imperial parties to be totally unopposed in your fake democracy elections. :roll: You're a strange one.


Which war are you talking about? If it's about Iraq then at least half of the Labour MP's voted against it, twenty tories voted against it and all the liberals voted against it. If it's the second world war you're talking about we did manage to come together and bash the fash in the end. That's one part of my heritage i look upon with fondness.

Also while we're on Iraq. I'd be interested in your opinion of Saddam Hussein and his regime...