Tequila wrote:
Oh, and you really don't want to ban irritating American shock-jocks while letting in much worse people in
Nearly all of the speakers banned from entering Britain are Muslims. Muslim conservatives like Yusuf Qaradawi have been banned. Qaradawi has some iffy views, but there's no way he's linked to terrorism, there's no way he's a salafi/fundamentalist, and there's no way he's more extreme than Michael Savage or Geert Wilders.
Tequila wrote:
They pose more of a threat than do other ones here in the UK
That's strange, I thought all the people passing hateful laws which threaten us were Christian and atheist. The people who brought in laws which treat 'staring at someone too long' and 'stimming in public' as crimes because they might offend NT people are Christian or atheist Labour Party folks. The people now trying to cut us off disability benefits because we don't fit easily into tick-boxes designed for physical disabilities are Christian and atheist Tories. The people drawing up "terrorism" guidelines which define "talking to yourself", "walking the wrong way against a crowd" and "using a laptop on a train station" as good reasons to physically manhandle someone are Christian and atheist police chiefs.
I hate to break it to you, but you're more likely to be run over by a drink-driver than blown up by a Muslim. Oh, and fundamentalists don't drink. So they're probably less threat to you than the average member of the public.
Tequila wrote:
Islamist nutjobs
Coming from someone with a mental diagnosis, that's a pretty amazing term to use.
You realise that as an autistic person, most of the nationalist "fit in or get lost" types would want to take all your rights away? UKIP want to go back to the 1950s, which means an institution for you. For them, you're one of the 'nutjobs'.
Meanwhile, in the real world, autistic Muslims such as Syed Talah Ahsan, at risk of deportation to America followed by lifelong torture, are getting swept up as 'terrorists' under laws which make it a crime to have the wrong ideas or be on the wrong side.
ruveyn wrote:
As soon as those bastards stop targeting Jews
What, like these Jews?
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/ne ... dy-1.70005
I wouldn't like to be a Sephardic Jew in the current context, and not at all because of the minimal risk of being targeted by salafis. The trouble is, the thought-police who are out persecuting Muslims can't necessarily tell a Muslim from a Jew, or from a Sikh, or from a (Christian) Brazilian electrician.