Reason #965,281 to not bother with single moms...

Page 5 of 5 [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

deadeyexx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 758

17 Apr 2011, 4:27 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
deadeyexx wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
ii) Mr. Zacharias was listed as father and filled the “father role” in the boys’ baptisms;


The man has legally adopted the boys, he's their father, and therefore he will be accountable as their father in case of divorce. Period.

I can't even get what's wrong in that case.


Where do you see this? I see no legal adoption. However they did become his DEPENDENTS. Big difference.

He recieved $400 a month he wouldn't have recieved otherwise for those two dependents. Yet for 15 months, the money went straight to him. Recieving money for depends you don't have is normally fraud. However, there was a loophole since he was still married.

Good for that judge to close this loophole.


Does it really make any difference whether there was a legal paper or not for it?? The xv points mentioned there are obvious evidences that he morally adopted these boys as his children and therefore he has the moral responsibility toward them after the divorce (like the biological father). He doesn't have the right to drop his father role just because he and their mother got divorced , fatherhood can't be circumstantial.

The law is made to protect the weak , and the weak in that case are the boys.


Did you even read the case? None of these points are relevant. People walk in and out of each other's lives all the time.

The law to protect the weak in the one that keeps the biological father paying child support.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

18 Apr 2011, 3:50 am

Is there a list with all 965,281 items on it? I'd be curious to see it.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Peeled_Lemon
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 49
Location: Asia

19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm

The people who think the ex shouldn't be paying child support also seem to be people who think that it's okay for him just to walk out of their lives.

Losing a father who has shown such love, care, and attention to them is tragic for these two boys. As adults we know that people we care about will meander in and out of our lives. That's an accepted part of being an adult. Children don't think like that, and any parent will tell you that when the other parent goes away for a while the child is full of nothing but thoughts of that parent - where are they? What are they doing? Do they still love me? Not only that, but I suspect this man probably does still want to have contact with these children. It would be cold of him not to want to maintain being the father figure for them despite whatever went wrong with their mother. Should he then be allowed that contact but have none of the responsibilities? Should such contact be banned on the basis that he is not their biological father? Should the boys be made to feel the torment of his rejection because of such arbitrary biologically based judgements? To see how the sudden absence of a parental figure can affect a child's life one has, surely, only to peruse threads in The Haven and on self-help websites for those who struggle with life.

The sad fact is that finances and child-raising are always competing priorities. The working parent resents the 'easy' life of the other parent. The other parent resents the fact that the working one can spend their days in a place where adults can converse and not throw food over one another. I'm sorry to say that once a person makes a commitment to be in the life of a child as a parental figure, they should face the responsibility to follow that through. And yes, that goes for women in relationships with single fathers, and indeed for gay couples regardless of the gender involved.

Further, to suggest that getting into a relationship with a single parent should somehow not involve getting into a relationship with that parent's child seems to be so show a rather scary
lack of understanding of what it is to be a parent. That lack of understanding is fine as long as one obeys this thread and stays away from single parents.

For those of you who want to know why I'm getting involved in this thread, it's because I teach EFL to a child who exhibits attention seeking behaviour of the worst kind. This is because he's basically unwanted by everyone in his life. His mother walked out on him, his father is too busy and rarely, if ever, sees him. His aunt and uncle don't particularly want him, and I seem to be the only teacher who can spend more than five minutes in his presence without getting exasperated with him. I make a deliberate effort to be calm with him, but even then, I can foresee a future for him where every school he attends or teacher he meets simply wants to pass him on and make him Somebody Else's Problem. Adults who get involved in the lives of children have an obligation to do their best for those children. Children don't respond well to being forgotten about.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

19 Apr 2011, 1:45 pm

Moog wrote:
Is there a list with all 965,281 items on it? I'd be curious to see it.


I asked the same question somewhere here.



blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

20 Apr 2011, 9:03 pm

This is one of the things for the aspie males "unable to get a partner or get laid", they have that advantage, so they don't have to worry about it, for the time being.

I hope the law doesn't change in the future to include childless men (especially if they are single and 'sexless') to pay for child support or something like that, a little bit paranoid I think :P

Moog wrote:
Is there a list with all 965,281 items on it? I'd be curious to see it.

965,281 reasons? wow, too many and I also wonder which are the others :?
Children is one, and more than enough.



blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

20 Apr 2011, 9:25 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The man has legally adopted the boys, he's their father, and therefore he will be accountable as their father in case of divorce. Period.

I can't even get what's wrong in that case.

Agreed, what is wrong is the divorce itself, and also, why he would got married and adopt the children in the first place, and later divorcing? It's scary.



ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

21 Apr 2011, 1:02 am

blunnet wrote:
I hope the law doesn't change in the future to include childless men (especially if they are single and 'sexless') to pay for child support or something like that, a little bit paranoid I think :P


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sour ... gle+Search

Was suggested in Sweden luckily all that imploded on itself.(It was all men however not just childless men.)

Also of interest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_on_childlessness

Soviet Union

I would have to move if America started taxing childlessness explicitly, although I think you get deductions for dependents so I don't really see how its that different from a childlessness tax.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

21 Apr 2011, 3:53 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Moog wrote:
Is there a list with all 965,281 items on it? I'd be curious to see it.


I asked the same question somewhere here.


I think it might be a slight exaggeration?


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Dee_
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2007
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 398
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

23 Apr 2011, 7:44 pm

Maybe that guy should fight for full custody of the 2 kids then... Then he can turn around and get child support from her... but if the courts deny his claim to custody, it is absurd then to hit him up for child support.



wefunction
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,486

23 Apr 2011, 7:49 pm

Dee_ wrote:
Maybe that guy should fight for full custody of the 2 kids then... Then he can turn around and get child support from her... but if the courts deny his claim to custody, it is absurd then to hit him up for child support.


I think they'd deny his petition based on the mother being a suitable parent and already the defacto residential parent. There is an existing legal system with laws and precedent at work here. :roll:



emuman100
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 555

23 Apr 2011, 8:56 pm

My ex was a single mother. I know you might think why bother with someone with "extra baggage", but I was really really in love with her, so I accepted that she had a son. Her son, being 2 and a half when I first met her, was quite a handful. We only had a relationship of 4 months (not because of her son). She wanted me to "play dad" right away, so I did small things for him like fix his food, change his diaper, put him in the car seat, get him dressed, and of course play with him. I did this because I wanted to make her happy and I also wanted to be a good role model to him. It kind of made me realize what a great thing a child can be, even though he wasn't mine. She thought that her perfect guy would be like one in a romance novel, so she kind of pressured me to act that way. It was exhausting to say the least. She's a wonderful person, an amazing mother, she just had a distorted image on what her perfect guy would be.

Being a father figure to him was a great experience, I got a lot of joy from it, despite the difficulties. It got me thinking if I could be a father, but I wasn't sure. I'm still not sure. I grew somewhat attached to him, so it was somewhat difficult when we broke up. After we broke up we still remained good friends, and we'd still hang out, and I'd still see her son. Currently, I don't bother with her because she used me even after we broke up and I got sick of it.

So it's not really not a bad thing. It taught me a thing or two about raising children and was a great experience for me.


_________________
EOF