14 May 2011, 12:46 pm
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
14 May 2011, 1:22 pm
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm
14 May 2011, 1:47 pm
Moog wrote:
I think I'll stick to no labels.
I'm in the Moog gang.
I'm in the Moog gang.
You just labeled yourself.
14 May 2011, 1:51 pm
Lecks wrote:
Moog wrote:
I think I'll stick to no labels.
I'm in the Moog gang.
I'm in the Moog gang.
You just labeled yourself.
Yes, I'm a Moogist. join my cult; Moogism. Free Moogasms to first ten contributors.
14 May 2011, 1:55 pm
Moog wrote:
Lecks wrote:
Moog wrote:
I think I'll stick to no labels.
I'm in the Moog gang.
I'm in the Moog gang.
You just labeled yourself.
Yes, I'm a Moogist. join my cult; Moogism. Free Moogasms to first ten contributors.
14 May 2011, 2:15 pm
Moog wrote:
Lecks wrote:
Moog wrote:
I think I'll stick to no labels.
I'm in the Moog gang.
I'm in the Moog gang.
You just labeled yourself.
Yes, I'm a Moogist. join my cult; Moogism. Free Moogasms to first ten contributors.
Like the song, "I'm in the Moog for Love"?
sartresue
Veteran
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism
14 May 2011, 5:15 pm
Moog wrote:
[; Moogism. Free Moogasms .
Freudian blip topic
Sin-ister.
15 May 2011, 9:12 am
Philologos wrote:
Moog wrote:
Lecks wrote:
Moog wrote:
I think I'll stick to no labels.
I'm in the Moog gang.
I'm in the Moog gang.
You just labeled yourself.
Yes, I'm a Moogist. join my cult; Moogism. Free Moogasms to first ten contributors.
Like the song, "I'm in the Moog for Love"?
The "Moog Synthesizers"?
For the counter group to the strident athiests:
"the God Squad"
"the God Goons" or "theistic thugs"
'" the Faither Guns"
"the faith base players"
Just brainsormin'
15 May 2011, 12:28 pm
15 May 2011, 4:01 pm
BurntOutMom wrote:
NobelCynic wrote:
Orwell wrote:
"Strident Atheists" is tongue-in-cheek as well, as "strident" is not typically a compliment. I'm in favor of the term Religious Rabble if for no other reason than that I like alliteration.
My problem with Religious Rabble is we are not all religious, some of us are SBNR and that name may prevent some of them form joining.
All the Strident Atheists really do is identify with the group and that seems to encourage them to become more strident. What I was thinking was doing the same thing. Perhaps theist is a bad word too because I wouldn't want to exclude agnostics, the only people I would want to exclude would be those who promote a specific image of God for the atheists to attack.
This is exactly what I've been thinking as I've followed this thread.. Though not an Atheist, I seem to side more with them on issues because I value their logic. I don't find religion or religious texts to have any value (as truth) to me whatsoever. While I believe in a God, I can admit that my thoughts are based on emotion and I have no proof at all. I don't see how I could fit in with a group such as has been described here. While the SA's seem to have a general consensus of ideology, and seem to respect, appreciate, and enjoy each other, I do not think that is the same with all of the "Others". I think, if you want to limit dissension within you group you should probably limit the scope of your group..Like... The Kreation-luvin Khristian Krazies.... Or something!
I apparently was wrong.... They don't seem to be getting along so well, or I am horribly misinterpreting their current exchanges.
15 May 2011, 4:09 pm
BurntOutMom wrote:
BurntOutMom wrote:
NobelCynic wrote:
Orwell wrote:
"Strident Atheists" is tongue-in-cheek as well, as "strident" is not typically a compliment. I'm in favor of the term Religious Rabble if for no other reason than that I like alliteration.
My problem with Religious Rabble is we are not all religious, some of us are SBNR and that name may prevent some of them form joining.
All the Strident Atheists really do is identify with the group and that seems to encourage them to become more strident. What I was thinking was doing the same thing. Perhaps theist is a bad word too because I wouldn't want to exclude agnostics, the only people I would want to exclude would be those who promote a specific image of God for the atheists to attack.
This is exactly what I've been thinking as I've followed this thread.. Though not an Atheist, I seem to side more with them on issues because I value their logic. I don't find religion or religious texts to have any value (as truth) to me whatsoever. While I believe in a God, I can admit that my thoughts are based on emotion and I have no proof at all. I don't see how I could fit in with a group such as has been described here. While the SA's seem to have a general consensus of ideology, and seem to respect, appreciate, and enjoy each other, I do not think that is the same with all of the "Others". I think, if you want to limit dissension within you group you should probably limit the scope of your group..Like... The Kreation-luvin Khristian Krazies.... Or something!
I apparently was wrong.... They don't seem to be getting along so well, or I am horribly misinterpreting their current exchanges.
I think it's how atheists show love?
15 May 2011, 4:16 pm
Moog wrote:
BurntOutMom wrote:
I apparently was wrong.... They don't seem to be getting along so well, or I am horribly misinterpreting their current exchanges.
I think it's how atheists show love?
Ohhhhh. Maybe it's all about the making up!
15 May 2011, 4:24 pm
