Vexcalibur wrote:
Fun and awesome it is. But don't take it seriously.
How about this: You rank it relative to other sources. The reason why is because "Don't take it seriously" is too vague. Cracked IS legitimately an information source. It's not as good as wikipedia, for instance, but it does not appear correct to say that one can't believe many of a cracked article's claims, so I would think one can take a lot of it seriously.
Information sources aren't just scholarly work or garbage. There is variation, and cracked is probably better than "I heard this from a buddy of mine", which is a common information source that people will take seriously.