gwynfryn wrote:
Duncvis, it seems to me my first post on this thread has been edited! Quite apart from the fact that it's against international copyright law (I hope, Nuttdan, that you are paying attention; it's the site owner who pays the fine, not the "moderator") I would like to think that WP is a place where people can post without taking an advance copy?
Speaking of witch, especially given the poor turnout on this thread; has no one else noticed the style similarity between vetivert and rhubarbnocustard...but what the hell; I've given up on other sites, but up until now I'd taken WP to be at least "open" but I'm not sure about anything right now. So tell me Dan, Alex, am I wasting my time visiting your site?
Eh?
I am somewhat puzzled Gwynfryn. Could you please let me know which part of this post is missing or altered, and it shall be restored, as I have not altered your post:
Gwynfryn wrote:
Alex, it's a sound idea! A well-meaning "aspie" site should strive for such a thing, and one would think a site full of "Aspies" would work together for such a conclusion?
Regrettably, there's no clear definition, and there are so many people, like Vetivert, for example, who pretend to be reasonable, but who are uniformly devious, and who are resolutely anti-Aspie...
I would hope that WP, at least, is a pro-Aspie site?
As for the rhubarb=vetivert suggestion, perhaps they can answer that one from their separate IP addresses.
Dunc
Cute! But how could I, as a mere visiting member, possibly provide IP addresses? And if two such trolls should agree to share their addresses, well each would have two possible locations...and if each should pay for, and aree to share two IPs... (which is not a great expense for two ungainfully employed persons) well each could have four personalities at their disposal...so what are you saying duncvis, and why are you defending people who are so clearly anti autism?