Page 1 of 2 [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


remember before you answer... bat nipples
No 87%  87%  [ 13 ]
Yes 13%  13%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 15

imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

17 Feb 2012, 2:04 pm

do you like joel schumacher's "movies"? honestly?



Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,807

17 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm

I am a pretty big Batman fan (although I haven't read many actual Batman comics, which might disqualify me). And I like every single incarnation of Batman for different reasons. (But my favourite will always be The Animated Series).

Batman is an icon. He can survive being interpreted in many different ways. There are grim Batmen, camp Batmen, silly Batmen, sarcastic Batmen...

EDIT: Come to think of it, my least favourite interpretation of Batman has to be Christian Bale. His voice is ridiculous.

EDIT: Actually, Batman on the Justice League shows was also very cool. But I guess that's the same Batman from The Animated Series. Basically, if you don't immediately think about this opening sequence when you think about Batman, then I don't want to be your friend: :wink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEx9r5enZsk

EDIT: I just realised that I am sort of contradicting myself. What I mean is, I don't mind if people want to do weird goofy takes on Batman, as long as everyone understands that the true "core" of Batman is the Batman who appears in The Animated Series, Justice League, and the Arkham games. (I'm pretty sure that this is roughly similar to the Batman of the comics, too, but that depends on the writer, of course).

EDIT: Actually, even that isn't quite true, is it? I mean, the Batman in the comics used to be extremely goofy, more like the Adam West Batman. I don't know what my opinions are anymore. :?



Last edited by Declension on 17 Feb 2012, 6:04 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Ookla
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 307
Location: Indiana

17 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm

No, I don't like Schumacher's movies. But then, I don't care much for Tim Burton's either. To me, Batman just doesn't work well with that self-aware campy humor. The old TV series has its moments, but I get tired of it quickly.

Christopher Nolan's Bat-movies? Just plain awesome. I can hardly wait for The Dark Knight Rises this summer.



Jory
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,520
Location: Tornado Alley

17 Feb 2012, 4:10 pm

Call me crazy, but I voted yes. As stupid and ridiculous as they are, I enjoy them the same way I enjoy the Adam West TV show.

MONKEY WORRRRRRRRK.

Image



tb86
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,831
Location: South Wales

17 Feb 2012, 5:34 pm

Suprisely I could actually watch Batman And Robin more than once because it's such a stupid movie that it's entertainable. Sure it sucks and I don't like it but sometimes I like to watch bad movies. Batman Forever is ok though nothing really good but ok.



imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

17 Feb 2012, 11:32 pm

Ookla wrote:
No, I don't like Schumacher's movies. But then, I don't care much for Tim Burton's either. To me, Batman just doesn't work well with that self-aware campy humor. The old TV series has its moments, but I get tired of it quickly.

Christopher Nolan's Bat-movies? Just plain awesome. I can hardly wait for The Dark Knight Rises this summer.


I agree with you 110% on every single point you just made in this post. Finally, a Batman fan who doesn't like Burton's movies.
I thought I was the only one. I love Nolan's films. I am also a huge fan of the Animated Series, Under the Red Hood, and the Arkham games. :batman:



Ookla
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 307
Location: Indiana

18 Feb 2012, 12:27 am

The biggest problem with Burton's movies is this: They're Tim Burton movies, not Batman movies. It's impossible to watch them without thinking, "Ah yeah, that's a very Burton moment." I like a lot of Tim Burton's movies, but I think he was a bad choice for Batman.

(I suppose Burton's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He filmed Planet of the Apes straight, without all of his usual "quirky" touches, and people complained that it didn't seem like a Tim Burton movie.)

As for Schumacher, I'll put it this way: Only twice in my life have I paid to watch a movie in the theater and walked out in disgust before the movie was over. Batman and Robin was one of those times.



IdahoRose
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 19,801
Location: The Gem State

18 Feb 2012, 3:55 am

Ookla wrote:
The biggest problem with Burton's movies is this: They're Tim Burton movies, not Batman movies. It's impossible to watch them without thinking, "Ah yeah, that's a very Burton moment." I like a lot of Tim Burton's movies, but I think he was a bad choice for Batman.

(I suppose Burton's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He filmed Planet of the Apes straight, without all of his usual "quirky" touches, and people complained that it didn't seem like a Tim Burton movie.)

As for Schumacher, I'll put it this way: Only twice in my life have I paid to watch a movie in the theater and walked out in disgust before the movie was over. Batman and Robin was one of those times.

I am a huge Tim Burton fanatic, so "Tim Burton moments" are like cinematic drugs to me. That's why I like his version of Batman even though I'm not really a fan of Batman in general. That's also why I think his version of Planet of the Apes was one of his worst movies - it lacked all of the special things that made me a devoted fan of his movies in the first place. (Except for Helena Bonham Carter. She was the best part of that movie IMHO).



Ookla
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 307
Location: Indiana

18 Feb 2012, 11:15 am

IdahoRose wrote:
I am a huge Tim Burton fanatic, so "Tim Burton moments" are like cinematic drugs to me. That's why I like his version of Batman even though I'm not really a fan of Batman in general. That's also why I think his version of Planet of the Apes was one of his worst movies - it lacked all of the special things that made me a devoted fan of his movies in the first place. (Except for Helena Bonham Carter. She was the best part of that movie IMHO).


Helena Bonham Carter is gold. I'll watch her in anything. Her performance in Sweeney Todd was especially good.



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

18 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm

Declension wrote:
I am a pretty big Batman fan (although I haven't read many actual Batman comics, which might disqualify me). And I like every single incarnation of Batman for different reasons. (But my favourite will always be The Animated Series).

Batman is an icon. He can survive being interpreted in many different ways. There are grim Batmen, camp Batmen, silly Batmen, sarcastic Batmen...

EDIT: Come to think of it, my least favourite interpretation of Batman has to be Christian Bale. His voice is ridiculous.

EDIT: Actually, Batman on the Justice League shows was also very cool. But I guess that's the same Batman from The Animated Series. Basically, if you don't immediately think about this opening sequence when you think about Batman, then I don't want to be your friend: :wink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEx9r5enZsk

EDIT: I just realised that I am sort of contradicting myself. What I mean is, I don't mind if people want to do weird goofy takes on Batman, as long as everyone understands that the true "core" of Batman is the Batman who appears in The Animated Series, Justice League, and the Arkham games. (I'm pretty sure that this is roughly similar to the Batman of the comics, too, but that depends on the writer, of course).

EDIT: Actually, even that isn't quite true, is it? I mean, the Batman in the comics used to be extremely goofy, more like the Adam West Batman. I don't know what my opinions are anymore. :?


Different strokes for different folks, Bale brings an intensity to the character that West, Keaton, Kilmer and Clooney sorely lacked. As for the criticism about his voice, it's getting predictably boring and cliched. I'd rather have Bale growling than a camp West/Clooney or a wooden Kilmer.

Guess i'm more of a fan of the darker side of Batman.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

18 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm

Declension wrote:
I am a pretty big Batman fan (although I haven't read many actual Batman comics, which might disqualify me). And I like every single incarnation of Batman for different reasons. (But my favourite will always be The Animated Series).

Batman is an icon. He can survive being interpreted in many different ways. There are grim Batmen, camp Batmen, silly Batmen, sarcastic Batmen...

EDIT: Come to think of it, my least favourite interpretation of Batman has to be Christian Bale. His voice is ridiculous.

EDIT: Actually, Batman on the Justice League shows was also very cool. But I guess that's the same Batman from The Animated Series. Basically, if you don't immediately think about this opening sequence when you think about Batman, then I don't want to be your friend: :wink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEx9r5enZsk

EDIT: I just realised that I am sort of contradicting myself. What I mean is, I don't mind if people want to do weird goofy takes on Batman, as long as everyone understands that the true "core" of Batman is the Batman who appears in The Animated Series, Justice League, and the Arkham games. (I'm pretty sure that this is roughly similar to the Batman of the comics, too, but that depends on the writer, of course).

EDIT: Actually, even that isn't quite true, is it? I mean, the Batman in the comics used to be extremely goofy, more like the Adam West Batman. I don't know what my opinions are anymore. :?


Different strokes for different folks, Bale brings an intensity to the character that West, Keaton, Kilmer and Clooney sorely lacked. As for the criticism about his voice, it's getting predictably boring and cliched. I'd rather have Bale growling than a camp West/Clooney or a wooden Kilmer.

Guess i'm more of a fan of the darker side of Batman, namely the Nolan films, the Arkham games, the Animated Series and the classic comics like Knightfall, Long Halloween, Hush, Killing Joke and Red Rain.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

18 Feb 2012, 2:00 pm

Ookla wrote:
The biggest problem with Burton's movies is this: They're Tim Burton movies, not Batman movies. It's impossible to watch them without thinking, "Ah yeah, that's a very Burton moment." I like a lot of Tim Burton's movies, but I think he was a bad choice for Batman.

(I suppose Burton's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He filmed Planet of the Apes straight, without all of his usual "quirky" touches, and people complained that it didn't seem like a Tim Burton movie.)

As for Schumacher, I'll put it this way: Only twice in my life have I paid to watch a movie in the theater and walked out in disgust before the movie was over. Batman and Robin was one of those times.


agreed. Burton's movies just don't seem like real Batman films to me. They're not horrible like Schumacher's, but they're not very good, either



imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

18 Feb 2012, 2:01 pm

LexingtonDeville wrote:
Different strokes for different folks, Bale brings an intensity to the character that West, Keaton, Kilmer and Clooney sorely lacked. As for the criticism about his voice, it's getting predictably boring and cliched. I'd rather have Bale growling than a camp West/Clooney or a wooden Kilmer.

[Guess i'm more of a fan of the darker side of Batman, namely the Nolan films, the Arkham games, the Animated Series and the classic comics like Knightfall, Long Halloween, Hush, Killing Joke and Red Rain.


agreed



gemstone123
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,196
Location: UK

18 Feb 2012, 2:15 pm

imbatshitcrazy wrote:
LexingtonDeville wrote:
Different strokes for different folks, Bale brings an intensity to the character that West, Keaton, Kilmer and Clooney sorely lacked. As for the criticism about his voice, it's getting predictably boring and cliched. I'd rather have Bale growling than a camp West/Clooney or a wooden Kilmer.

[Guess i'm more of a fan of the darker side of Batman, namely the Nolan films, the Arkham games, the Animated Series and the classic comics like Knightfall, Long Halloween, Hush, Killing Joke and Red Rain.


agreed


+1

Oh and I despised the portrayal of Bane. :(


_________________
Am usually bored so PMs are welcome!

Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils ...


LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

18 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm

gemstone123 wrote:
imbatshitcrazy wrote:
LexingtonDeville wrote:
Different strokes for different folks, Bale brings an intensity to the character that West, Keaton, Kilmer and Clooney sorely lacked. As for the criticism about his voice, it's getting predictably boring and cliched. I'd rather have Bale growling than a camp West/Clooney or a wooden Kilmer.

[Guess i'm more of a fan of the darker side of Batman, namely the Nolan films, the Arkham games, the Animated Series and the classic comics like Knightfall, Long Halloween, Hush, Killing Joke and Red Rain.


agreed


+1

Oh and I despised the portrayal of Bane. :(



Look no further than Tom Hardy, he'll give Bane his balls back. Watch Bronson or Inception for proof of how decent a choice he'll be for Bane.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


fragileclover
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 505

18 Feb 2012, 3:09 pm

I answered no, but I'll gladly admit to sitting down and watching Schumacher's Batman movies for their pure 'so-bad-it's-good' entertainment value. If I want a hearty laugh, Batman and Robin is where it's at...and the thing is, I think Schumacher intended that. Joel Schumacher is a very capable director, who has made good films, so it makes no sense for him to completely fail at the Batman thing, unless it was completely intentional camp.

Actually, the more I'm talking about it, the more I wish I'd answered 'yes' to the poll question. No, they are by no means good if you're looking for something remotely serious or accurate to the comics, but they are still hilarious.

As for Burton/Nolan...I like one film a piece. I love Burton's original Batman, on which I disagree that it has the look and feel of a 'Burton film.' I don't think it's immediately obvious or obvious at all that it's a Burton work. I think Keaton was a fantastic Batman, and a likeable, believable Bruce.

Batman Returns is complete ass. Total, over-the-top Burton crap. Gotham goes from looking like a gritty, dangerous city, to a colorful, art deco winter wonderland. AWFUL. The script is super corny, and not in the hilariously bad way that Schumacher's films are...just plain bad.

I hated Batman Begins...way too long, too dull, too implausible...Bale was crap as Batman and totally despicable as Bruce Wayne. Katie Holmes was obnoxious. The editing of the fight scenes or any action-filled scene was horrific. Yuck.

Now, The Dark Knight...THAT'S where it's at. A great movie...better cast, better plot. Bale was still 'meh', but everything else was totally on point. For the record, I've always been a huge Christian Bale fan (since 'Mio min Mio' when he was 12 years old), but I don't think he's a great Wayne/Batman.

I wrote an article comparing Batman and The Dark Knight within the confines of genre, and how both are excellent films considering their intent. You can read it here, if interested: Batman, The Dark Knight and the Importance of Genre


_________________
Aspie Quiz: AS - 141/200, NT - 77/200 (Very likely an Aspie)
AQ: 34/50 (Aspie range)
EQ: 32 / SQ: 68 (Extreme Systemizing / AS or HFA)
Diagnosed with AS and Anxiety Disorder - NOS on 03/21/2012