Page 1 of 3 [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

10 Jun 2012, 3:49 pm

There's something that just makes me sick to my stomach.

It was when I was looking into that old, post-Flukegate, story where Rush Limbaugh ever so tactful attacked another "single, overeducated, white woman" - whatever "overeducated" means. The woman was Tracie McMillan.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovi ... -she-says/

Forbes wrote:
McMillan was in San Francisco on her book tour when Limbaugh set her in his crosshairs. She had no advance warning that her book was going to be featured on “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” and only became aware, she tells me, when someone tweeted at her to say he was talking about it. “It’s totally bizarre,” she says. “I had no idea that Rush Limbaugh knew that I existed. My grandmother would be thrilled, because she’s a fan of his.”

Less thrilling to her was Limbaugh attacking her for being female, single and educated. “It just didn’t really occur to me that my being single would have any bearing on whether whether my book was valid,” she says. “It seems to be a way to dismiss my intelligence or capacity to do the work.”

McMillan grew up working class in a rural area outside Flint, Michigan. It was Limbaugh country, she says.

“It’s interesting — I grew up listening to Rush Limbaugh and we actually watched his talk show in my high school [back when it was televised] for a class on current events. So I’m familiar with the politics. I certainly don’t think they’re foreign or alien or weird.

“But this really intense dismissal of women by someone like Rush Limbaugh, who’s considered an authority by a lot of people — that, to me, is distressing. I just wasn’t expecting anybody to say flat out that my work wasn’t valid because I’m a single woman.”

She also takes exception to Limbaugh’s calling her “over-educated.” “I only have a B.A. I don’t have an advanced degree,” she says. “Maybe he thinks women shouldn’t go to college at all?”


But what really pissed me off was when I read the details of McMillan's biography.

http://traciemcmillan.com/pages.php?con ... avGallID=1

Tracy McMillan wrote:
My name is Tracie McMillan. I live in Brooklyn, but I'm proud to say that I grew up in Michigan, about an hour from one of my favorite cities—Detroit. My dad was a lawnmower salesman and my mom had an English degree, and they moved us to Holly, a rural town outside of Flint, for good schools and open space. I was the oldest of three girls, and helped out at home when my mom fell ill around the time I was 7. The insurance company didn't want to pay for her care, so when she got too ill to live at home, she bounced between institutions that would hold off on charging us until the insurance company settled. She left our home when I was 12; we lost the case with the health insurance company when I was 14; and she died when I was 16.

My first job, at 14, was making caramel apples at an apple orchard. At 16, I got a job at Big Boy, stocking the salad bar before moving on to waitress. At 17, I got a generous but partial scholarship to NYU, moved to New York City, and cobbled together the rest of my tuition and living expenses as a tutor, nanny, waitress, personal assistant and intern; at one point I simultaneously juggled five part-time jobs. I stayed here because I landed in a rent-stabilized apartment that kept the city affordable.

I kept tutoring and freelancing until I wrangled myself a job at City Limits as managing editor. I was a copy editor, photo editor, office manager and deadline nag, and in my free time I started writing stories about the things that interested me: welfare, child care, anything, really, about how working families eked out a living. I'm proud, and a little shocked, that I've now won several national awards, including the Harry Chapin Media Award and the James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism, and have been recognized by the James Beard Foundation, for my work on these topics. Even though I'm not on staff at a big, fancy magazine or newspaper, the awards put my work in the same league as the publications I beat to win them: the New York Times, Fortune, Businessweek and Time.

Over time, my work has appeared in a wide range of publications including the New York Times, Harper's, Slate, Saveur, Salon and Gastronomica. In October 2012, I was named a Senior Fellow at Brandeis University's Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism. (It's unpaid, but the title helps). My first book, The American Way of Eating, a nonfiction project examining food and class in America, was published by Scribner in February 2012.

I am represented by Rebecca Friedman at Hill Nadell Literary Agency in Los Angeles.

* * * * *

Please note: I share personal details here not because my childhood is anyone's business but because, as a white woman who went to college, the default presumption is that I am elite. While my income is also nobody's business, I can tell you that I have lived well into the bottom third of America's income brackets the bulk of my adult life, and my fellowship, as noted below, is unpaid.


Limbaugh, for all his exhortations of hard-work, the evils of affirmative action and "blacks getting handed everything" (or whatever thinly veiled, BS way he'd phrase it), and what not, comes from a professional class family full of lawyers. Furthermore, he flunked college due to him not trying - an unwillingness to do the work. He is the pinnacle of having things handed to him - sure, he has some talent at hate radio, but didn't endure the same financial insecurity a working class radio hobbyist would in turning their hobby into a multimillion dollar industry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limba ... background

This is beyond disgusting and it's beyond disgusting how often "latte liberal" is used as an epithet by people who worship real elites like Limbaugh (his family has had politicians in its past as well - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbaugh_family ), who can f*ck up so badly yet have the supports to be anything but ruined from it. This wouldn't be infuriating if so many of these same people didn't have such contempt for "liberal students" - you know, the students of this generation who're working while they're in college at lot more than their predecessors - people who Gingrich says should "go through school faster" and "work [even] more".

http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academ ... t/pern.htm


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

10 Jun 2012, 4:17 pm

I don't really understand what this 'food justice' concept that Ms. McMillian wrote her book about. What exactly is she advocating?



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,193
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

10 Jun 2012, 5:03 pm

Someone just needs to tell Rush right about now that he's only allowed to criticize the ideas of white Anglo-saxon men from now on; anyone else is in the moral infallibility cart.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Jun 2012, 5:55 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Someone just needs to tell Rush right about now that he's only allowed to criticize the ideas of white Anglo-saxon men from now on; anyone else is in the moral infallibility cart.

:D :lmao: :lmao:



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

10 Jun 2012, 6:16 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Someone just needs to tell Rush right about now that he's only allowed to criticize the ideas of white Anglo-saxon men from now on; anyone else is in the moral infallibility cart.


It isn't about him "criticizing the ideas" but him acting like an as*hole. It appears that according to Rush a woman's place is making and raising babies. Why else would he point out this woman's "singleness" and "over-education" as an insult? I know people on the right cried foul when bloggers and talking heads on the left made thinly veiled sexist remarks regarding Sara Palin.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,193
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

10 Jun 2012, 6:37 pm

marshall wrote:
It isn't about him "criticizing the ideas" but him acting like an as*hole. It appears that according to Rush a woman's place is making and raising babies. Why else would he point out this woman's "singleness" and "over-education" as an insult? I know people on the right cried foul when bloggers and talking heads on the left made thinly veiled sexist remarks regarding Sara Palin.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/ ... od_justice
http://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinehow ... dra-fluke/

In the light of these two articles it seems like he's just obnoxiously passionate about keeping things in private sector as much as possible. The suggestion that he thinks women should be pregnant and barefoot though chained to a stove and singing spirituals though doesn't really jive with the context.

I think its stupid for him to get that carried away, for sure, and I think its good that he apologized for the comment he made. All the same though it seems like issues of whether or not men and women should have federally subsidized birth control or whether there should be some government mandate on the prices of produce seem to fall pretty well in line with the kind of 'government takeover bid' that draws ire from conservatives for a completely different set of reasons.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


AstroGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,582

10 Jun 2012, 6:39 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Someone just needs to tell Rush right about now that he's only allowed to criticize the ideas of white Anglo-saxon men from now on; anyone else is in the moral infallibility cart.

You completely missed the point. He isn't criticising the ideas, he is making an ad hominem attack because the ideas came from a single, educated, woman. It is the exact opposite of criticising the ideas. Rather than letting the ideas stand on their own merit he criticised the author in a sexist fashion.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

10 Jun 2012, 7:14 pm

Yeah, Tech, great logic. When I take objection with the political views of men, I always make sure to ask what it is with these " overeducated, single men" rather than actually criticizing their views.

Have some decency or common sense. I know you're ideological blinkers are preventing it, but try!


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

10 Jun 2012, 7:18 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Someone just needs to tell Rush right about now that he's only allowed to criticize the ideas of white Anglo-saxon men from now on; anyone else is in the moral infallibility cart.


How can you be this oblivious? Did you even read the articles or listen to what he said? He didn't say "these food justice views are wrong, ill-defined, or redistributionist" or something like that. He said "what is it with all these white, single overeducated - which doesn't mean intelligent - single women". If he attacked her for having wrong views (as frequently occurs in politically circles), there'd be no issue (or the issue would be with respect to the ACTUAL issue). Instead, he shouted about what a "white, overeducated, single woman" Tracie McMillan was (which, incidentally, isn't about her having wrong or even "SOCIALIST!! !" views).


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,193
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

10 Jun 2012, 7:25 pm

I read as much as I could find. It seemed like he gave questionable shots *while* debating the value of the actions, beliefs, books they were putting forward. The 'overeducated' seems to tie back to a lot of what I used to hear Prager say - that essentially higher education is generally a dogmatic catechism into leftism, that little 'education' really goes on there, and that people are brainwashed into believing things like the idea that no viewpoint is valid without a study to back it up; I'm not going to say that I agree with that viewpoint, nor that I see no truth in it whatsoever. I think in general though I see you reading some heavily spun articles and getting real upset over something that never really happened in the sort of way that they're claiming it did. I'm not a fan of Rush's etiquette but to assert that he holds core beliefs that women should leave the work world or be pregnant and barefoot I don't see the evidence.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Jun 2012, 8:09 pm

I'll bet she ends up selling a pile of books now, to people who otherwise would not have heard of her.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,193
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

10 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm

Possibly a few more, albeit its a book on a watching paint dry topic.

Obviously Rush though should connect the dots - things that never would have been heard of get heard of when he starts playing the whistles.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Jun 2012, 8:40 pm

http://www.amazon.com/American-Way-Eati ... 006&sr=1-1

Of 38 Amazon reviewers, she got an average of 3.6 out of 5 stars.

Book Description wrote:
What if you can’t afford nine-dollar tomatoes? That was the question award-winning journalist Tracie McMillan couldn’t escape as she watched the debate about America’s meals unfold, one that urges us to pay food’s true cost—which is to say, pay more. So in 2009 McMillan embarked on a groundbreaking undercover journey to see what it takes to eat well in America. For nearly a year, she worked, ate, and lived alongside the working poor to examine how Americans eat when price matters.
From the fields of California, a Walmart produce aisle outside of Detroit, and the kitchen of a New York City Applebee’s, McMillan takes us into the heart of America’s meals. With startling intimacy she portrays the lives and food of Mexican garlic crews, Midwestern produce managers, and Caribbean line cooks, while also chronicling her own attempts to live and eat on meager wages. Along the way, she asked the questions still facing America a decade after the declaration of an obesity epidemic: Why do we eat the way we do? And how can we change it? To find out, McMillan goes beyond the food on her plate to examine the national prio-rities that put it there. With her absorbing blend of riveting narrative and formidable investigative reporting, McMillan takes us from dusty fields to clanging restaurant kitchens, linking her work to the quality of our meals—and always placing her observations in the context of America’s approach not just to farms and kitchens but to wages and work.


I don't know--might be worth a read.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,193
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

10 Jun 2012, 8:49 pm

Short story - government spends like a drunken sailor, fed prints money to monetize debt, prices of everything go up wildly while wages largely stay the same (add in gas prices going up from fuel purchases from China adding to the fuel costs in agriculture). Coincidences? Methinks not.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Jun 2012, 8:51 pm

If her books gains significantly popularity after this she should thank Rush for the advertising.
Maybe it won't be so disgusting after all............



AstroGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,582

10 Jun 2012, 8:52 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Short story - government spends like a drunken sailor, fed prints money to monetize debt, prices of everything go up wildly while wages largely stay the same (add in gas prices going up from fuel purchases from China adding to the fuel costs in agriculture). Coincidences? Methinks not.

You can hardly blame government spending solely on the left. The right tends to spend just as much as the left (or what passes for the left in the US) does except on different things.