Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

fs
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 92
Location: El Paso, TX, USA

12 Dec 2006, 4:17 am

I stumbled on this little on-line test here:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.html

I got a 35, which aroused my curiosity. So then I found this:

http://ani.autistics.org/dsm4-autism.html

which honestly sounds ridiculous. All this criteria and the above test measure is how sociable one is. Is not being sociable now considered a psychiatric disorder? Am I missing something? So I thought I would ask for an explanation of all this in an autistism forum, which I found here. Can anyone here clear this up for me?

Sorry if this is a "newbie" question, but this area is new to me.



Panik
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 129
Location: A room somewhere in Europe

12 Dec 2006, 4:28 am

Nope being non-social is not unique to autism. Those tests only matter if you take your own background into account. For example, have you always had trouble initiating or maintaining eye-contact even with your closest family? That could be an indication of some neurodeviance, for me it's always been a big problem.



rpm2004
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 788
Location: Reno,NV,USA

12 Dec 2006, 6:36 am

Autism is a magical place where kids eat cotton candy and ride rollercoasters all day,while people in costumes dance around and pose for pictures.

Oh,sorry I was thinking of Disney land


_________________
"Dear friend, the silent streets and the cool of the moon invite us to a walk. Let us go forth, while all the world is in bed and none may mar our solitary exaltation."


celtic1985
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 191
Location: Glasgow / Cardiff

12 Dec 2006, 6:47 am

rpm2004 wrote:
Autism is a magical place where kids eat cotton candy and ride rollercoasters all day,while people in costumes dance around and pose for pictures.

Oh,sorry I was thinking of Disney land


Now that was a horrible concept, don't mention the 'D' word again...



SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Chicago, IL

12 Dec 2006, 7:19 am

I only scored 28.

OBVIOUSLY, somebody that wasn't very detail minded made a quiz that in HIS/HER mind covered all the bases. The subjectivity, poor wording, and bias hurt its veracity though!

Steve



blackcat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,142
Location: 10 miles south of sanity.

12 Dec 2006, 7:37 am

i scored a 48.


_________________
I think I know. I don't think I know. I don't think I think I know. I don't think I think.


SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Chicago, IL

12 Dec 2006, 8:16 am

OK, I found a couple questions I slipped up on, and answered in a black or white fashion, and I got 42! Just goes to show how subjective it can be.

Steve



simon2wright
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 1 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 86

12 Dec 2006, 11:38 am

I scored 44
Simon.



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

12 Dec 2006, 12:14 pm

I'm speaking for myself, but I'm done with tests. I feel like I have to "pass" them or something to prove something as if the test is determining who I am and not me determining that.



Kosmonaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,253

12 Dec 2006, 12:25 pm

Today i scored 40.
What do i win?



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

12 Dec 2006, 12:31 pm

Kosmonaut wrote:
Today i scored 40.
What do i win?


Another day of aspie reassurance 8)



DerekD_Goldfish
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 286

12 Dec 2006, 12:36 pm

I got a 41



SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Chicago, IL

12 Dec 2006, 1:15 pm

Corvus,

If I wanted to "pass" it first time, I could have. I knew what they were looking for in most cases. I think we're all just curious, etc... Besides, I don't like/trust tests, and I said that several times.

Heck, I took one test a few days ago where I would have said "no" to bouncing your leg. I mean "what is that?" I just never really thought about it. So why did I say yes? I went to a get together that last tuesday, and I guess because I was bored and/or nervous, my right leg was bouncing like crazy.

Steve



Lightning88
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Aug 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,890

12 Dec 2006, 2:11 pm

I got an 11...



OddDuckNash99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,562

12 Dec 2006, 3:34 pm

DerekD_Goldfish wrote:
I got a 41

Me, too! :D Some of the things are more me, though, like going on-and-on about the same thing, needing routine, not knowing when it's my turn to speak on the phone, and not letting others get a word in edgewise. And then there were some that I didn't even really understand or know how to answer...
-OddDuckNash99-


_________________
Helinger: Now, what do you see, John?
Nash: Recognition...
Helinger: Well, try seeing accomplishment!
Nash: Is there a difference?


Sixela
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 307

12 Dec 2006, 4:22 pm

I've been thinking about that lately (What is autism?) because of some recent interactions with so-labeled psychologists (well, ok, the one over-generalizing egotistical ass I've had the opportunity to see :roll: ). Seeing as no-one that I know of uses their entire brain, and cannot engage it (as a whole) at will, are we humans not ALL 'autistic'? Not in the classic definition of course, but if one part of the brain is not being used and another develops/is more active to compensate for that, THAT"S what's defining the characteristics and actions of the person. And we're all like that, the difference between people would seem to lie in which part(s) of the brain that are not being engaged and the part(s) which compensate for that. I wonder, on average, if 'aspies' (given brain scans) would not prove to use more of their brains than 'NTs', and therefore 'NTs' would evidently be the more 'autistic'. I'd be willing to bet that's correct in respect to the population of already diagnosed 'aspies' vs. 'proven' 'NTs'. But on a whole, I believe if we could prove it, no group, however defined or separated would be anymore 'autistic' than any other. Bottom line, no two people are exactly alike, and we all need to help each other in the areas where we do not function well, instead of separating ourselves and generalizing others so much that some people need a 'diagnosis' of their personal neurology to cope in life, as if they need an excuse and some proof that they are who they are. I hope all that made sense the way i wrote it... :?