Cei wrote:
Why try to convince people to be irreligious? I don't see the point of it. I can at least understand religious people trying to convert others, because then, from that point of view, it's just the ethical thing to do. I mean, what kind of jerk would believe their friend was going to be tortured eternally and not care? But if you think no one's beliefs matter, why try to change anyone's mind? Note that just debating stuff for the fun of it is totally different than actually being bothered by people disagreeing and wanting to convince them of something.
Okay, I can see valid(ish) reasons for it, such as sincerely believing all or most religions are harmful, or not wanting people to "waste" their lives on something you consider a lie or delusion, but I'm still curious about what else people might think.
Figured I'd ask this here, since there seem to be plenty of people who could tell me their own answers.
I don't.
But if the religious are going to play the conversion game, so can i. Turn-about is fair play, no?
From the point of view of an irreligious person, the religious are just torturing themselves with a lot of old fables. Wouldn't it be ethical to free them from such pointless flagellation?
By any measure, avowed atheists are a minority vs. christians. Some atheists feel like they are set upon by christian soldiers bent on changing them. I wish people weren't dicks.