Why do you find the word "ret*d" offensive?

Page 1 of 8 [ 115 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

r84shi37
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 448

28 Dec 2012, 2:05 am

ret*d definition:

Verb
Delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment.

Noun
offensive. A mentally handicapped person (often used as a general term of abuse).

ret*d definition:

Adjective
Less advanced, esp. mentally, than is usual for one's age.

Synonyms
backward - delayed

I don't find "ret*d or ret*d" offensive. I used to verbally use them; ever since I joined WP I learned that many aspergians (and probably anyone with a mental condition) hate it, so I have avoided using them. Now, looking at it from a technical standpoint, most aspergians are held back or delayed in some form or another i.e socially, motor issues, etc. I don't consider us handicapped, but some people do, and I guess from a very particular perspective we could be considered handicapped. Aspergians are generally socially less advanced than their peers, however, I think we tend to be intellectually more advanced. Aspergians are probably delayed in certain ways as well.

It's really just a word, and the meaning of the word more or less can apply to aspergians. Of course, there are plenty of types of mental conditions, I'm just using AS as my example because I'm fairly sure that most WP users are aspergians. I understand that in certain context it can be offensive, but generally. it's just a word; like "obese" or "weird".


_________________
Do I have HFA? Nope, I've never seen a psychiatrist in my life. I'm just here to talk to you crazies. ; - )


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

28 Dec 2012, 2:38 am

Most people don't use it according to the dictionary definition, though. They use it to mean "stupid", which is insulting to both the person being called a ret*d, and people who are actually ret*d.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

28 Dec 2012, 3:25 am

r84shi37 wrote:
Noun
offensive. A mentally handicapped person (often used as a general term of abuse).


After that, you had to ask?



Vitamin-K
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Portland, Oregon

28 Dec 2012, 3:44 am

Sometimes doing something that is dumb (putting your hand over an open flame to see if it's hot) can be perceived as ret*d.

Calling somebody doing that ret*d is in context. I don't mind it so long as it's not just thrown around. I can think of many other choice words to call people who are acting aloof. ;)



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,681
Location: the island of defective toy santas

28 Dec 2012, 4:18 am

anybody who would call another person a ret*d might as well be describing themselves.



Noetic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,277
Location: UK

28 Dec 2012, 5:01 am

I tend not to find words like that offensive. If they are used as an insult towards me, then yes I find it offensive, but I never understood this NT tendency to get hysterical about meanings they impose on words and how you "aren't supposed to say that".



IChris
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: Norway

28 Dec 2012, 5:25 am

I do not find them offensive; doing so would be to politicize them and neglect the history of them. I find words like that great and which more accurate may describe aspects of my life and place it in a wider historical setting.



TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

28 Dec 2012, 5:26 am

eric76 wrote:
r84shi37 wrote:
Noun
offensive. A mentally handicapped person (often used as a general term of abuse).


After that, you had to ask?


^ This.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


JellyCat
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 338
Location: U.K.

28 Dec 2012, 5:26 am

Yes, I do find it offensive. I think it's disgusting. I wish people wouldn't use it as an insult so causally.



LeeAnderson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 936
Location: Cookeville, Tennessee

28 Dec 2012, 6:06 am

I do find it very offensive.



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

28 Dec 2012, 6:59 am

I do. I also find it offensive how people refer to things they don't like as being "gay". I see this as homophobia even if it's not meant that way. I love gays and it would never occur to me to use that word to describe something as bad since I see that as a good thing. I'd no more use that as an insult than saying something is "beautiful" or "delicious" as an insult.

I also find it offensive when people throw around the word "downie" as an insult.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,681
Location: the island of defective toy santas

28 Dec 2012, 7:07 am

i grew up the recipient of that word.



jk1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,817

28 Dec 2012, 7:45 am

I think it became an offensive word because people kept using it in unkind ways with unkind, insulting intentions, to put people down, as in "That ret*d managed to delete my files." said in an angry way about someone who did something stupid.

The word "b***h" may be similar in that sense. The original meaning wasn't offensive, but people kept using it to mean an unpleasant woman. Now it's considered a very offensive word. I guess that's how words evolve.

As you can see in this thread, different people have different perceptions. So, it can also be quite subjective.

I myself find the word "ret*d" rather negative.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,500
Location: Stalag 13

28 Dec 2012, 8:18 am

eric76 wrote:
r84shi37 wrote:
Noun
offensive. A mentally handicapped person (often used as a general term of abuse).


After that, you had to ask?


That's the reason that I'm offended by the word, ret*d. What's the point of this thread? I was called that hurtful word by my peers all through grade school from kindergarten to Grade 12 and you had to ask?


_________________
Who wants to adopt a Sweet Pea?


Marcia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,148

28 Dec 2012, 8:44 am

eric76 wrote:
r84shi37 wrote:
Noun
offensive. A mentally handicapped person (often used as a general term of abuse).


After that, you had to ask?


This.



WerewolfPoet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2012
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 842

28 Dec 2012, 8:57 am

My logical understanding of the word' s technical applications does not lessen the pain that has been associated with it. As a young child in Special Education, this very word has been a fear that has sunk into the heads of my parents and added creases around their eyes. Even though my intelligence tested above average, perhaps even gifted in terms of verbal intelligence, even though I was removed from all Special Education services at the end of third grade, even though I can acknowledge that I have my quirks, the word still fills me with an overwhelming sense of being a disappointment and an inadequacy. For me, the word just cuts too deeply into a pain of years past that I have never been quite able to shake.