Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

27 Apr 2013, 6:35 am

click

Quote:
The House overwhelmingly passed a measure to end furloughs at the Federal Aviation Administration, sending it to President Obama for his signature. White House press secretary Jay Carney said Friday the president would sign the bill, which the Senate approved late Thursday by unanimous consent. Meanwhile, Liberals are upset, complaining that Democrats caved to Republican demands, and have essentially lost the sequester fight:

The point of sequestration is supposedly to create just enough chaos that regular people — people with political clout, such as, say, business travelers — demand that Congress fix it. Or as the Democrats conceived it, to create the public pressure they need to knock Republicans off their absolutist position on taxes.

Well, they got their outcry…and then promptly folded. They allowed Republicans to inaccurately characterize the FAA furloughs as a political stunt. Then without any organized effort to cast the flight delays as part of the same problem that’s also keeping poor people homeless they assented to providing special treatment to the traveling class.

So now the big, predictable opportunity to return to the sequestration debate under genuine public scrutiny is gone.


Scumbag congressmen will trip over each other in a rush to make sure Business WASPs don't wait one minute for a plane flight...

BUT poor kids who need Headstart and free lunches and old folks who depend on meals on wheels can rot in hell.

Ain't American values grand? :roll:


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


AgentPalpatine
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,881
Location: Near the Delaware River

27 Apr 2013, 10:39 am

You do know that the National Review is on the "right" side of the political divide?

The sequester is not good policy, nor is it good politics.

To the policy merits of the decision...what else were they supposed to do? No one is terribly interested in putting through a full funding bill for 5/1-9/30 (5 months), and there's no agreement on how much to spend in any event. The alternative to giving DOT/FAA more spending auhtority was to allow a major US industry and piece of infrusture to rot away for at least 5 months.

The real spending battle will be closer to September, because that's for a full fiscal year, and things are a mess after 2 years of continueing resolutions and the sequester.


_________________
Our first challenge is to create an entire economic infrastructure, from top to bottom, out of whole cloth.
-CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "The Centauri Monopoly"
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (Firaxis Games)


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

27 Apr 2013, 11:06 am

AgentPalpatine wrote:
You do know that the National Review is on the "right" side of the political divide?

.


Yes, and I think it's significant that they are calling BS on this bill too.

Congress needs an enema.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus