Page 2 of 2 [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,985
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

18 May 2013, 7:16 am

seaturtleisland wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Personally i think its highly unlikely there will be a nuclear war within 114 years, much less our lifetime. Any potential belligerents realise the stakes are too damn high.

Will every potential belligerent in the next 114 years be in his right mind? Will they all have the mental capacity to realise the stakes are too high and back off?

Actually, if you look far enough above you'll see that thomas81 actually said that and I replied to it. Someone else mis-quoted it and made it look like I said it.
Whatever, though.....

“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.”
- William F. Buckley


User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,514
Location: Ontario, Canada

18 May 2013, 9:02 am

So many possible avenues of destruction. But, I think it'll be a plague that gets us . . .