Reducing voting age to 16

Post Reply New Topic

I read article about lowering voting age to 16 to fight ageism , i think it's dumb idea and bad example to rest of Europe and World.

What's a sixteen year old can know about politics, except that this kid is easier to manipulate than adult. Maybe it's the politicians count.

Lowering the voting age is too dangerous for this reason that the national parliaments would be able to get celebrities the likes of Justin Bieber

Lowering the voting age is too dangerous for this reason that popculture "celebrities" like Justin Bieber can be elected as MP in National Parliaments, and it's step toward's idiocracy

Reducing voting is also dangerous because government maybe urgent be left-wingers to further age reduction, and someday 12 years old would have voting right and that is RIDICULOUS. It would be like gay marriage right, when they got what the wanted, they now want adoption rights.
give somebody finger and he'll take a hand

Sure, let 16 year olds vote but make all voters pass a civics test then. Bet those left wingers would **** their pants at the thought of that. Just mining for votes and nothing more. Children's interests are represented through their parents.

For the most part, politicians who have suggested this route have seemed to be those desperate for uninformed votes (ie- the Scottish National Party, the Parti Quebecois, etc) to push their sovereigntist agendas, though I am sure there have been some politicians not related to a secessionist movement who promote it

One word: Prefrontal cortex.

Stupid idea. The voting age should be raised to 21 or above. Candidates for public office should only be those who have served honorably in their nation's armed forces - they know a little something about service and sacrifice. 16-year-olds know nothing about service, sacrifice, or even honor, so they know nothing about what it takes to run a country. They're concerned only with matters of vanity, popularity, entitlements, and doing whatever they want to do without anyone telling them 'No'. They'd make the perfect support group for any party that would promise them freedom and handouts, so of course any candidate or political party that is desperate for votes would want a constituency of ignorant and gullible people who are easy to manipulate.

Again, allowing 16-year-olds to vote is a stupid idea.

Nah, let’s raise the voting age to 100. Nobody knows how to live better than they do! Besides, it’d save a lot of hassle handling the votes and reduce immensely the chances for someone to tamper with them.

Frankly, the voting age should be 30. Young people lack the life experience to make sound political choices. Indeed it's easier to hoodwink the young into bad ideas because they are drawn to idealistic values that life experience would clearly says are unworkable.

I wouldn't say those above the voting age make any more informed choice to be honest, mostly that people are more or less opinionated.

However I would be against it, because it won't be any more democratic, and there needs to be a set age. Why change it?

One of the myths about voting it is it representational. It is a very, very minute part representational in any given election, and mostly about generating a result in the fairest way possible. From a a purely mathematical point of view, you can't model voter will in any given moment, and besides people are incredibly fickle as it is. Modeling is based on data, and it is impossible to know that much about the populous, and a vote contain very little data at all.

Voting is a necessary and important part of democracy, but it isn't the only part. The reason why it works is not because it is perfect, but because a turnover is more or less inevitable.

Real democracy, isn't perfect. It is actually the mess and the wranglings ensure that it is more democratic not less. That is not exclusive to elections, there is plenty of turnover outside of elections.

I don't like it if the party I didn't vote for gets in, but I have to accept, if that didn't happen enough it could be a very dangerous thing indeed, and actually I might be wrong about them. Time in opposition only helps, it is especially humbling where a part has lost bad, and some positive things can come out of that.

Also democracy isn't all about one party holding power and getting knocked off after a full term. Democracy is about scrutiny, and strong opposition.

Just think what would happen is some of the electorate view's actually come to fruition.....

Opinions are one thing, governance is another thing altogether. It is not so easy, to come up with workable policies, and satisfying populism.

Most people are too simpleminded at any age to cast a well thought out vote.
They could lower the voting age to 10 and it wouldn't matter.

The Americans LWOPP such people, why not let them vote?

When I was 15 I thought it was terrible that my country could be run without my well-informed vote....
I had all the answers it was all so obvious

Looking back, I really thought I could make a difference.
We were much less informed than youngsters today though, the only information came from the papers & TV.

My first reaction was "No, no, they don't know enough". And then I look around at the adult voters who supposedly do...
why the hell not give teens the vote, it can't get any worse.