Leagues? Give me a break...

Post Reply New Topic

OK OP. I know this is a poll but...

If leagues don't exist, then why are you here? I don't see the leagueless dating game treating us very kindly, do you

How is this communist dating thing supposed to come about exactley?

Through socialist dating. It's a long, winding road, comrades, but we will get there...together!

I am not desperate, I already told you I need a job You probably have one, on top of an apartment, so what is holding you back, that is why you are here. Leagues don't exist, the concept of economic, caste, popularity, looks, and demographic bias does exist, but they are completely conquerable, thus why leagues don't exist.

"I can't talk to her because she is too beautiful....."
"No I think you are handsome, what a chicken arse......"


and so it goes.

While I agree with some of your points, and that we only hold ourselves back...in some societies leagues do exist. They are not determined by an individual but by a majority, a consensus, a culture.
In some places none exist, that could be a village town club or whatever. It's like prejudices, social norms and everything else. It's different everywhere you go. I can tell you in my city, there is definitely leagues. Everyone is very much like those shows Jersey Shore, Geordy Shore, The Only Way Is Essex.

WHAT LEAGUE AM I IN?

Is it a matter of my physical appearance? My financial situation? My preference of dogs over cats? SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME FIGURE OUT WHAT LEAGUE I'M IN

from reading your post, in the top 20 percent.

Where I live the girls are more likely to hunt, fish, and or farm, and still look as beautiful as a celeb, than to act like a celeb at all. So people here are nicer to those out of their league than in other places. I get greeted by strangers.

a revolution.

I would think past promiscuous behavior would put me in the bottom twenty percent for a lot of people. Or being a feminist etc.

so, why does a shy male have to be below an out going male. why is a geeky male below an alpha male.
both are men, so why does one man have to be the top level. why can't all men be consider equal in the dating system.
we need a revolution where all men have the same equal chances of dating.

people deny all you want. But in this current system men are not equal at all in dating.

I don't think dating has ever been or will ever be fair. I just don't think that's a possibility. We're working from biological urges, and that's never going to create a system that feels fair for everyone.

maybe to the religious right. I would put you in the top 20%, maybe the top 10%. you seem very popular with both men and women.
for someone with asperger. You do very well with people.

and for a women in general, you do very well too. even alot of nt women, don't even get as much male attention as you do.

you may not see yourself as in the top league, and maybe other folks don't. But to me, you do very well with people.

It's not like I've dated models and athletes etc.

I think aspie girls do better because instead of being seen as weird and creepy we're seen as quirky and eccentric.

It's an advantage some of us get as a result of unfair gender roles.

Also, I think if any woman went on the prowl for sexual partners the way I did in the past, they probably would be just as successful. Especially if they didn't base much on a person's appearance. I have an automatic attraction to even pseudo intellectuals, even if it fades after I get what I want.

I'm worse than a male chauvinist in a lot of regards. I don't mislead people to think that I'm looking for a relationship, but I have often seen people as sexual objects and conquests and not had a lot of regard for their feelings.

well, thanks for being honest. I have alot of respect for women, who will admit
aspie women do better in dating due to society role.