Page 1 of 3 [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

A1ien
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 24

19 Jun 2013, 10:56 am

Does anyone feel they have been prosecuted for being on the Autistic spectrum or felt that this has prejudiced the case against them ?

I don't know but I would guess that this is more likely with Asperger like symptoms as these are not so obvious.

I am in the UK so can relate more to the law there but would like to hear from anywhere else people think they have experienced this.

Obviously make sure you don't include identifying details.

My feelings are, maybe someone will correct me, that Asperger's in particular is not treated sympathetically but is actually treated as a 'lame excuse'.

:(



TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

19 Jun 2013, 11:11 am

Did you mean persecuted instead of prosecuted? I don't think it is against the law anywhere to be autistic. We can often find ourselves being persecuted indirectly due to our differences and the lack of understanding and compassion of society in general. We don't easily fit into societal structures.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


Diabolikal
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 304
Location: Los Angeles CA, Somewhere in Universe

19 Jun 2013, 11:13 am

I wouldn't say prosecuted, but definitely most of my life in school I was a target of lots of things, mean pranks that took advantage of my trusting nature, being regarded as a plaything for mean kids in middle school. And then, actually I don't know for sure, sorry for wasting a post like this.



Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

19 Jun 2013, 11:53 am

Yeah, if NTs are supposed to have this empathy, I wish they would have empathy towards people on the spectrum (in other words, be able to put themselves into our shoes, just like we're expected to do to them).

OK, I'm not an ''us vs them'' person, I just mean in general. Like when I go out in the street, I get odd looks from older people, hostility from younger people, and humiliated by obnoxious teenagers. I get fed up with being singled out all the time because I know I'm not that distinguishable; I keep up with the fashion and wear stylish clothes, I always look presentable, and I have learnt myself to keep up an approachable gait. I've even been told by a very trusting aunt of mine, that I look a lot more confident than I used to, which I believed I did anyway. So if there is a teeny, minuscule difference, I thought it would become rather unnoticed among crowds. And there are people about who look and act ''weirder'' than me so I don't see what the issue with me is.

But anyway, yeah, I do feel kind of punished for being on the Autistic spectrum. Especially when I was on unemployment benefit for almost 5 years on the trot. I think what made finding jobs the most difficult was the dilemma of whether I should tell the employers about my disability or not. I felt there was a catch between both options.


_________________
Female


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,205
Location: Pacific Northwest

19 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm

I felt this way as a kid. Kids could easily get me into trouble, get me to do things by egging me, I could be easily pressured, kids took advantage of me, I was treated different, even by school staff, I felt I was not allowed to be normal and be like everyone else. I felt I had different rules from everyone and rules didn't apply to them but did for me. I was also bullied. I was very frustrated and at home I would feel normal where I was treated as such. I also felt in my teens I was being punished for having anxiety because my parents would get mad at me about it. I often don't feel that way as an adult. I still feel vulnerable but lot of people don't know me and I don't want them to know me. I feel once they do, they will know they can take advantage of me if they know my weak spots and try and mess with me. I also try and not be too open about myself.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses.


A1ien
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 24

19 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm

TallyMan wrote:
Did you mean persecuted instead of prosecuted? I don't think it is against the law anywhere to be autistic. We can often find ourselves being persecuted indirectly due to our differences and the lack of understanding and compassion of society in general. We don't easily fit into societal structures.


No definitely prosecuted I know people on the autistic spectrum are persecuted!

I was thinking along the lines of the following -

"Olympics spectator with Parkinson's wants 'exoneration' after arrest ...
8 Aug 2012 ... Mark Worsfold, 54, says he was handcuffed by Surrey police officers 'for not smiling' while watching men's cycling road race."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/aug/0 ... st-smiling

This person had Parkinson's but it seemed to me that as a lot of people on the Autistic have problems with their facial expression whether this could also happen to them.

I'm talking about cases reliant on people's perception/allegation and also in dealing with the Police where they feel a person is not co-operating or just look 'dodgy'.



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,205
Location: Pacific Northwest

19 Jun 2013, 12:33 pm

I have dealt with the police only once. I was looking in second hand shops and someone thought I took a movie so he called the police. They came and found me and arrested me for "shoplifting" and they handcuffed me and took me to the station. It was very humiliating because it happened in a small town and I knew if someone who knew me saw the whole thing, they would gossip about it and then those people will tell other people about it. They did call my parents and they came and got me an brought me home. There was no bail or other charges and I wasn't locked int he cell. But I did start to doubt myself thinking what if I really did take a video tape and didn't remember. That's how vulnerable I was and my parents were furious about all this and they had to pay to get the vehicle out of the yard they had impounded. My dad ordered them to search the car so they did and everything was dropped. Good thing I didn't buy a movie somewhere else or they would have thought it was the tape I took.

I don't know what I did that made the store owner think I took something. I don't know if it was autism related or not. He also wouldn't show my mother the video and it was to limit liability so he refused to show her it.

The whole ting was scary because I didn't know what was going to happen and how it was going to effect me in school and I thought I may have to switch schools or drop out if the word followed me to another town. I stayed hidden at home all weekend long and Mom had to make me go to school on Monday. Yes I was teased about it for about two weeks, but I was also given support too about it so things turned out good. Then everyone moved on.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses.


A1ien
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 24

19 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm

More cases ...


"Trauma of autistic boy shackled by police
Father describes suffering of son who was dragged from pool by officers and restrained"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/feb/1 ... tistic-boy

"Autistic girl spent ten hours in a cell – because police wrongly thought she was drunk"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... drunk.html

Plymouth police stripped autistic girl and restrained her in body suit
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/Plymout ... story.html



1401b
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2012
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,590

19 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm

Well yes. If you cannot self advocate well, or even make things worse.


_________________
(14.01.b) cogito ergo sum confusus


foxfield
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 276
Location: UK

19 Jun 2013, 3:09 pm

League_Girl wrote:
I have dealt with the police only once. I was looking in second hand shops and someone thought I took a movie so he called the police. They came and found me and arrested me for "shoplifting" and they handcuffed me and took me to the station. It was very humiliating because it happened in a small town and I knew if someone who knew me saw the whole thing, they would gossip about it and then those people will tell other people about it. They did call my parents and they came and got me an brought me home. There was no bail or other charges and I wasn't locked int he cell. But I did start to doubt myself thinking what if I really did take a video tape and didn't remember. That's how vulnerable I was and my parents were furious about all this and they had to pay to get the vehicle out of the yard they had impounded. My dad ordered them to search the car so they did and everything was dropped. Good thing I didn't buy a movie somewhere else or they would have thought it was the tape I took


I think that is a very upsetting thing to happen to someone. I'm very sorry that you were treated like that. :(

In a lot of peoples minds, different = suspicious. In my opinion, anyone who believes this is an idiot!



CSBurks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Apr 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 766

19 Jun 2013, 3:21 pm

When I was a child, yes, I was the target of ridicule.



TheValk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 644

19 Jun 2013, 3:35 pm

I was once fined in an instance where anybody else would receive a verbal warning at worst.



A1ien
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 24

19 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm

TheValk wrote:
I was once fined in an instance where anybody else would receive a verbal warning at worst.


This is the kind of thing I mean, I suppose the Police are just a reflection of society at large, but because of the power they have they should be a lot better.

I can remember an old comedy sketch where a man gets arrested for 'walking in a suspicious manner' and another arrested for ,looking suspicious.

Because of the race thing it probably wouldn't happen now but I can remember in London West Indians were regularly getting arrested for "threatening behaviour" when most of the time they were just getting excited and gesticulating with their hands and arms, a cultural thing, that London bobbies just weren't used to (or maybe they just used that as an excuse).

And I think an element of that still exists, the unusual facial expression or body movements may not be the reason for arrest, perhaps they were inclined to do that anyway, and the oddness just gave them the excuse.



Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

20 Jun 2013, 12:02 am

I recently read an article about detecting lies, apparently these common misconceptions are even listed in the police manual:
1. Ignore the verbal communication (because everyone lies) and only pay attention to the nonverbal communication.
2. Perceived mismatch between verbal communication and nonverbal communication = lying/guilty.
3. Looking away and appearing nervous or moving a lot = lying/guilty.

It reads more like an autistic catching manual than a criminal catching manual. :x

Apparently most people believe in this (and are aware other people believe this) so then try to look less nervous, use more eye contact and fidget/stim/move around less when both lying and telling the truth when questioned, and the reason liars are successful in that is that there is not much truth behind the stereotypes.
The article then goes on to list the actual truths about liars, the fallacies people often believe, and that because the police (etc) go by the wrong information they are not always good lie detectors. It even showed that if they taught the police a new better way of catching lies, they didn't improve while the non-police group did. They speculate that it was because the police got confused (maybe because it didn't match their manual) or because they didn't want to listen to an "outsider" about how to detect lies.
The article mentions cultural differences that are perceived by (mostly cacuasian) people as suspicious.

This is All About Psychology's introduction:
"See following link to read a comprehensive full-text, open-access journal article by Aldert Vrij, Par Anders Granhag & Stephen Porter which discusses some of the common misconceptions about lying (for example, the belief that people telling lies are more nervous), reviews the shortcomings of commonly used lie-detection techniques, and presents new empirically supported methods for recognizing lies with greater accuracy."
www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/p ... i_10_6.pdf



A1ien
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 24

20 Jun 2013, 2:30 am

Anomiel wrote:
I recently read an article about detecting lies, apparently these common misconceptions are even listed in the police manual:
1. Ignore the verbal communication (because everyone lies) and only pay attention to the nonverbal communication.
2. Perceived mismatch between verbal communication and nonverbal communication = lying/guilty.
3. Looking away and appearing nervous or moving a lot = lying/guilty.

It reads more like an autistic catching manual than a criminal catching manual. :x ....
f


Interesting.

1. This is the complete opposite of what I do, although I've learned to make eye contact (I still haven't completely mastered it, I tend now to maintain eye contact too long which is seen as intimidating).
Although I'm looking I still don't read much into expression all the time I'm processing what they've said.
And if I have problems with what they're saying I have to look away.

2 and 3. I do both of these and therefore am obviously lying and guilty of whatever it is I'm being charged with.



Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

20 Jun 2013, 3:29 am

A1ien wrote:
Anomiel wrote:
I recently read an article about detecting lies, apparently these common misconceptions are even listed in the police manual:
1. Ignore the verbal communication (because everyone lies) and only pay attention to the nonverbal communication.
2. Perceived mismatch between verbal communication and nonverbal communication = lying/guilty.
3. Looking away and appearing nervous or moving a lot = lying/guilty.

It reads more like an autistic catching manual than a criminal catching manual. :x ....
f


Interesting.

1. This is the complete opposite of what I do, although I've learned to make eye contact (I still haven't completely mastered it, I tend now to maintain eye contact too long which is seen as intimidating).
Although I'm looking I still don't read much into expression all the time I'm processing what they've said.
And if I have problems with what they're saying I have to look away.

2 and 3. I do both of these and therefore am obviously lying and guilty of whatever it is I'm being charged with.


Yes, it is infuriating isn't it? That's why police act so weird around autistics, they have been trained to do so.
I have learned how to make eye contact too, but it still feels too intimate and distracting.
By the way, the article mentions that people (NTs too) that are thinking hard find eye contact distracting, and that is why it can actually be true sometimes as they assume liars may have to think extra hard, but they also say that thinking hard is not the sole domain of liars. The other reason for the stereotype is apparently that people associate looking away with shame, and they feel liars should feel ashamed and thus look away :shrug: