UK local councils predicted to become skeleton services

Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Laddo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 581

04 Jul 2013, 8:50 am

Quote:
Local authorities will offer little more than a skeleton service, providing few services beyond social care and rubbish collection by the end of the decade if projected cuts to local government continue, council leaders have warned.

The Tory chair of the Local Government Association, Sir Merrick Cockell, warned the trajectory of government spending meant that current funding arrangements "will not see us through for very much longer" and would lead to the running down or wholesale closures of services such as libraries, road maintenance, school support schemes and youth clubs.

Financial modelling by the LGA calculates that by 2020 funding cuts, coupled with rising demand for services, will create a funding shortfall of £14.4bn, with the widest gaps in funding falling on the most deprived areas of England, where demand for services is likely to be highest.

"It is evident that a system in which demand and costs are going up and funding is going down is unsustainable and unless something changes, by the end of the decade, councils will not be able to deliver existing services in the way they are delivered now," said Cockell.

Last week's comprehensive spending review revealed that councils' funding will be cut by £2.1bn in 2015-16, a scale of annual reduction the LGA says is likely to continue for six more years.

The LGA estimates that while total council income in England will have fallen by £7.4bn between 2010-11 and 2019-20 (a real terms reduction of 27%), demand for expenditure, driven largely by an ageing population, will rise by £7bn (14%).

This figure would be even higher, but it factors in £1.6bn which councils will raise by increasing charges for local services, as well as £8bn from efficiency savings. The LGA described its financial assumptions as "rather on the optimistic side" and did not include additional financial pressures caused by welfare reform.

The communities secretary, Eric Pickles, attacked what he called the "doom mongers" and said mainstream political consensus around the need for public spending restraint meant councils would have to "make extra effort" to find savings well into the future.

Speaking at the LGA conference on Wednesday, he announced that community budget pilots, which seek to find savings by forcing different public services to work together more effectively in local areas, would be rolled out nationally, with the potential to save billions of pounds.

The LGA said spending on adult social care, children's social services and refuse collection, which are considered "core" local services and are relatively protected, will absorb an ever greater share of council funds, with the effect of reducing funding for other council services by 46%.

But it points out that councils have a legal duty to spend on many of those other services. If they also protected free bus passes to pensioners, street sweeping, and repaying loans on infrastructure investment, all duties which councils would find difficult to decommission, then the level of cuts falling on other services rises to 60%.

Local authorities will face a wave of legal challenges as they try to balance meeting their statutory duties and delivering a balanced budget, the LGA predicts.

Councils in poor areas, which are more dependent on central government grant will be worst hit. Although the LGA does not single out councils by name, its data shows that the 50 most deprived councils in England will grapple with potential funding gaps of up to 48%. For the least-deprived councils, most Conservative-controlled, the gap will be up to 21%.

A separate report published by the Royal Society of Arts said councils urgently need to manage soaring demand for services. Although social care demand was set to increase greatly over the next decade, funding for elderly social care would fall by 18% by 2015-16 and by 23% for children's social services.


This is really, really scary stuff. From The Guardian.


_________________
I am no longer using this account or this website. Do not bother contacting me because any messages will be ignored. The fact that you can't delete your profile while all your information is retained is also disgraceful.


Last edited by Laddo on 05 Jul 2013, 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Jul 2013, 11:36 am

The less a government does the better. All governments should be doing is police, law courts and armed forces.

It is not the governments place to Do Good. It is the governments place to Keep Order.

ruveyn



Laddo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 581

04 Jul 2013, 12:47 pm

If the government doesn't do any good for their citizens, there will be no order. Cuts to local police forces means order is more difficult to maintain. This is about local councils, in any case. How are the roads expected to be maintained if the council won't? What are the many poor elderly people in the UK whose relatives can't afford to take them in supposed to do to survive when their local residential home gets shut down? These cuts will be made without council tax cuts, too, meaning more taxpayers' money will go on less services.


_________________
I am no longer using this account or this website. Do not bother contacting me because any messages will be ignored. The fact that you can't delete your profile while all your information is retained is also disgraceful.


neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

04 Jul 2013, 12:50 pm

Well the MPs are just about to get a big pay rise so they can figure out what to do.



AgentPalpatine
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,881
Location: Near the Delaware River

04 Jul 2013, 2:51 pm

How does one go from having one of the most literate societies in the world and being a Superpower in their own right (at least as late as the 1950s), to being completely broke?


_________________
Our first challenge is to create an entire economic infrastructure, from top to bottom, out of whole cloth.
-CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "The Centauri Monopoly"
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (Firaxis Games)


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Jul 2013, 3:36 pm

Laddo wrote:
If the government doesn't do any good for their citizens, there will be no order. Cuts to local police forces means order is more difficult to maintain. This is about local councils, in any case. How are the roads expected to be maintained if the council won't? What are the many poor elderly people in the UK whose relatives can't afford to take them in supposed to do to survive when their local residential home gets shut down? These cuts will be made without council tax cuts, too, meaning more taxpayers' money will go on less services.


The best thing a government can do for its citizens is keeping the society quiet peaceful orderly and making it an attractive place for investors to build productive firms which will give the people employment.

ruveyn



neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

04 Jul 2013, 4:04 pm

AgentPalpatine wrote:
How does one go from having one of the most literate societies in the world and being a Superpower in their own right (at least as late as the 1950s), to being completely broke?


It all started to go wrong in the 70's with large monopolies, excessive trade union power and frequent strikes.
The 80's was run under the famous line 'there is no such thing as society' and all national assets were sold off.
No more manufacturing, no technological innovation, large contracts awarded overseas and virtually no tax on the massive amounts of fantasy money created in the City of London.
Oh, and corrupt upper class, house of lords, MPs who like to fill each others back pockets, and inefficient and bureaucratic local government.



Laddo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 581

04 Jul 2013, 4:45 pm

Yep. The country developed a credit culture to replace former British trades. Our empire was arguably built on trade as well as force, and yet there we were, destroying centuries of export and import business and replacing it with the belief in credit - money that only exists "in the books", so to speak. When the international banking crisis smacked the earth will full force, naturally our large financial industry took a battering. The credit industry relies so heavily on debt, but debt is also its killer. We're slowly getting into more and more debt and the wealthy don't give a damn - they're always going to be protected while the less well-off majority gets hit hard.


_________________
I am no longer using this account or this website. Do not bother contacting me because any messages will be ignored. The fact that you can't delete your profile while all your information is retained is also disgraceful.


xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

05 Jul 2013, 12:55 am

Britain is not going bankrupt, Cameron decided to do these things for a lark... it is ideological, purely ideological, and is completely unnecessary.



Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

05 Jul 2013, 4:25 am

Th will explain then why I had a "YouGov" survey last night, asking me what I thought of Local Government Services like Libraries, Schools, road maintenance, etc.

For years I have been telling people the plan of the controlling world bankers is the breaking apart of powerfull countries like Britain and America by closing down industry, making us more reliant on their issue of money, then withholding the issue of money to bring around economic collapse, to weaken social cohesion with forced mass immigration, so that no recovery can be made from an organised chaos except by their offered solution which will be their "New World Order" Global dictatorship and we will all be in such dire straits that we will willingly accept it.



Laddo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 581

05 Jul 2013, 5:01 am

ruveyn wrote:
The best thing a government can do for its citizens is keeping the society quiet peaceful orderly and making it an attractive place for investors to build productive firms which will give the people employment.

ruveyn


It's nowhere near as simple as that. Like I said, it's not going to be quiet, peaceful or orderly if people are suffering due to mismanagement of taxpayers' money. The London riots in 2011 were a good indicator of what people will do when they're pissed off at the way they're treated by those in power. Cuts to the police and a rising crime rate (because most of the modern policing methods don't actually work) means the police are beginning to take drastic measures to keep order.


_________________
I am no longer using this account or this website. Do not bother contacting me because any messages will be ignored. The fact that you can't delete your profile while all your information is retained is also disgraceful.


neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

05 Jul 2013, 5:10 am

It takes drastic measures to keep order when faced by a generation that feel they don't have much, or anything, to lose.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

05 Jul 2013, 12:41 pm

By historical standards, Britain's debt is very low... this is an ideological project. Cameron envisages unrest as the ordering of water cannons indicates. He is the cause of all this, he and those behind him.



KingdomOfRats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,833
Location: f'ton,manchester UK

05 Jul 2013, 4:46 pm

we need to cut the wages of the government;and use this saved cash towards looking after the country; OR make wages based on the quality/standard of each MPs work,screw them they get way to much money whilst people they represent are struggling to cope with severe disability,elderly relatives,poverty etc.


_________________
>severely autistic.
>>the residential autist; http://theresidentialautist.blogspot.co.uk
blogging from the view of an ex institutionalised autism/ID activist now in community care.
>>>help to keep bullying off our community,report it!


neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

05 Jul 2013, 4:57 pm

They are just about to get a rise of around £10K a year.
The parlimentary watchdog has said that if they don't get a rise they will start fiddling their expenses again.

As for austerity measures:

Quote:
"Of course, this is not a good time to be talking about the pay element of the package, save to notice that in the public sector pay increases are limited to 1 per cent a year. But, given that there has never been a good time, this is as good a time as ever," he added.

Sir Ian Kennedy, IPSA.



Laddo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 581

05 Jul 2013, 5:21 pm

neilson_wheels wrote:
They are just about to get a rise of around £10K a year.
The parlimentary watchdog has said that if they don't get a rise they will start fiddling their expenses again.

As for austerity measures:
Quote:
"Of course, this is not a good time to be talking about the pay element of the package, save to notice that in the public sector pay increases are limited to 1 per cent a year. But, given that there has never been a good time, this is as good a time as ever," he added.

Sir Ian Kennedy, IPSA.


Is that £10k a year each?! If so, that is nauseating. Why do we just bend over and take it like this? It makes me so angry ARRRRGH!

As for the claim that they will fiddle expenses again if they don't get a pay rise: What. The. f**k. It's no different to a thief saying if he doesn't get a load of money he will just steal again. Because it is f*****g stealing. This is just gloating. Please, please, PLEASE let someone assassinate the lot!

Edit: just found this. Please sign. Although I doubt anything will come of it, just like every other petition against these a***holes doing whatever they please.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/44225


_________________
I am no longer using this account or this website. Do not bother contacting me because any messages will be ignored. The fact that you can't delete your profile while all your information is retained is also disgraceful.


cron