Page 6 of 6 [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

UndeadToaster
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 340

22 Nov 2013, 11:03 pm

Ann2011 wrote:
UndeadToaster wrote:
Of course not. You should, however, recognize that he did not feel that it was wrong and forgive him for it.

Sure, but that doesn't mean I have to carry him inside me for 9 months and give birth to him.

Fair enough. I just wanted to decrease animosity between pro-choice and pro-life with the whole intent thing.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

22 Nov 2013, 11:51 pm

The thing about intent is that when a woman is pregnant and really doesn't need to be at the time, the main goal of hers is simply to get the baby out of her body. The only way that can be done is by abortion. She's not malicious about it and simply wants it dead, she wants it not inside of her. Because abortion is the only way to make her not pregnant, that's her only choice to be not pregnant. So, for people who say it's murder, it's not because her goal isn't simply to kill it, her goal is to remove it from her body by whatever means she has available to her that will work within her time frame. I know women who have had abortions and wished that they could have simply gotten pregnant at a later date, they had no ill will against the baby, they just couldn't have a baby at that time.



UndeadToaster
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 340

22 Nov 2013, 11:53 pm

OliveOilMom wrote:
The thing about intent is that when a woman is pregnant and really doesn't need to be at the time, the main goal of hers is simply to get the baby out of her body. The only way that can be done is by abortion. She's not malicious about it and simply wants it dead, she wants it not inside of her. Because abortion is the only way to make her not pregnant, that's her only choice to be not pregnant. So, for people who say it's murder, it's not because her goal isn't simply to kill it, her goal is to remove it from her body by whatever means she has available to her that will work within her time frame. I know women who have had abortions and wished that they could have simply gotten pregnant at a later date, they had no ill will against the baby, they just couldn't have a baby at that time.

That's a good point. I will be more careful about calling it murder.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

23 Nov 2013, 2:04 am

UndeadToaster wrote:
I'm saying that murder is not a personal healthcare choice. If the women wanted to kill herself, that's personal, if she wants to kill her kid, its not. Maybe I'm wrong that an unborn baby is not worthy of personhood and is part of the mother's body. However, I do believe they are separate, and for that reason, I am not supporting government intervention in women's personal healthcare choices. Accusing pro-life supporters of trying to deny rights to women is the equivalent of us calling you murderers, neither of which are true.

Would you support the right to abortion if it was merely the forced physical separation of two organisms that you already see as "separate"? Say, a c-section at 12 weeks gestation, and then the woman goes her merry way and the zef can do what it wants, too?

Never mind that c-sections are ridiculously dangerous for the mother as compared to natural birth, which is already 10 times more dangerous than an abortion at 12 weeks...



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

23 Nov 2013, 2:07 am

zacb wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
UndeadToaster wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
UndeadToaster wrote:
All I'm trying to say is that pro-life people are trying to save innocent people from an early, avoidable death. Whether or not a fetus is part of a woman or a separate person is irrelevant. Their intent is as pure as yours, regardless of who is correct.

Intent is irrelevant.
It's irrelevant when discussing the action itself, but it's not irrelevant when making judgements about that person's beliefs and character.

So because the offspring doesn't have any intent to harm the mother, she is of bad character if she aborts it? I don't agree.

If a mentally ill person comes at me with a knife, do I not have a right to defend myself? He may not of been of the mental capacity to form intent - so does that mean I should just stand there and let him stab me?

Then again if the penis was inside you voluntarily, you agreed to accept all responsibility that become of that action, including any STDs or pregnancies.

Sometimes 'accepting responsibility' means 'seeking medical treatment to end the problem,' so, yeah. Abortion can be the responsible choice in the same way that antibiotics can be the responsible choice.

And, not to nag, but don't forget that said penis is not some sort of inanimate object. Women don't get pregnant off of dildos.



Max000
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,547

23 Nov 2013, 3:44 am

OliveOilMom wrote:
The pro life side says that all babies can be adopted. I don't know if that's true or not, but maybe some would be adopted. You know, it's not a strategy that every woman would have to use. If she's lined up adoptive parents for the baby, or someone else has lined them up, then use that option. Otherwise go with traditional abortion. I don't know how it would work out, but it's a thought that could strike a happy medium for both sides.]


So you want women to wait to have an abortion while they try to line up adoptive parents for the baby, then when they can't find anyone willing to adopt the baby, have a late term abortion, where the fetus is even more developed? :roll: BTW the general consensus is usually that the woman should have the abortion as early as possible.

And yes the pro life people are full of BS. There are already almost a million children in this country awaiting adoption, and they are doing nothing to adopt those kids. Add another 40 million to that, and their chances for adoption would go to zero. And that will never change. Because the pro-life Conservatives in this country, are the most greedy self-centered SOBs on this planet. They care less about children after they are born. They vote against anything that will help children. The most conservative areas of this country have the worst most underfunded schools, and child services.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

23 Nov 2013, 4:37 am

Max000 wrote:
OliveOilMom wrote:
The pro life side says that all babies can be adopted. I don't know if that's true or not, but maybe some would be adopted. You know, it's not a strategy that every woman would have to use. If she's lined up adoptive parents for the baby, or someone else has lined them up, then use that option. Otherwise go with traditional abortion. I don't know how it would work out, but it's a thought that could strike a happy medium for both sides.]


So you want women to wait to have an abortion while they try to line up adoptive parents for the baby, then when they can't find anyone willing to adopt the baby, have a late term abortion, where the fetus is even more developed? :roll: BTW the general consensus is usually that the woman should have the abortion as early as possible.

No, in my scenario they would already have lined up and screened many adoptive parents and when a woman chose to use the incubator, they would call them and tell them they had a baby for them.

And yes the pro life people are full of BS. There are already almost a million children in this country awaiting adoption, and they are doing nothing to adopt those kids. Add another 40 million to that, and their chances for adoption would go to zero. And that will never change. Because the pro-life Conservatives in this country, are the most greedy self-centered SOBs on this planet. They care less about children after they are born. They vote against anything that will help children. The most conservative areas of this country have the worst most underfunded schools, and child services.


I don't think everybody who is pro life is that way at all. I'm pro choice and have many pro life friends and we agree to disagree, and I've even had an extremely rabid pro life friend. However none of my friends were politicians.

One thing you point out is that there are many kids in this country awaiting adoption, but they are older kids and the people who are waiting only want a baby. They won't adopt an older kid, for whatever reason they have for that. This idea would kill two birds with one stone. The woman wouldn't be pregnant any longer and a couple who only wants a baby to adopt, not an older child, would get their baby.

Either way, it'll never happen. Neither side wants to lose such a powerful political motivator as abortion.



YourMajesty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 807
Location: The forest

23 Nov 2013, 6:33 am

I find it so strange, so many pro-life people eat so much meat…. innocent animals being horribly abused during life to meet cruel slaughter at the end of their short, unworthy existence but that's okay apparently. The only difference is that the foetus, without brain activity, is in essence human but does that outweigh all these intelligent, conscious, feeling pigs for instance? It's HUMAN, yes, but that's all there is to it?

And because of something so principle, unwanted children are to be born to moms who can't r won't look after them as they deserve. Just build more orphanages? Nah.

And the arrogance it requires to actually think you (in general) know that it's best to let a child be born. As if pregnant women go for abortion for fun. The fact that they do it to begin with shows imo that in most cases, reasons are more than valid enough. But those are just to be brushed aside for the mere principle of the foetus being human?



UndeadToaster
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 340

23 Nov 2013, 10:42 am

LKL wrote:
UndeadToaster wrote:
I'm saying that murder is not a personal healthcare choice. If the women wanted to kill herself, that's personal, if she wants to kill her kid, its not. Maybe I'm wrong that an unborn baby is not worthy of personhood and is part of the mother's body. However, I do believe they are separate, and for that reason, I am not supporting government intervention in women's personal healthcare choices. Accusing pro-life supporters of trying to deny rights to women is the equivalent of us calling you murderers, neither of which are true.

Would you support the right to abortion if it was merely the forced physical separation of two organisms that you already see as "separate"? Say, a c-section at 12 weeks gestation, and then the woman goes her merry way and the zef can do what it wants, too?

Never mind that c-sections are ridiculously dangerous for the mother as compared to natural birth, which is already 10 times more dangerous than an abortion at 12 weeks...

Yes, a safe way to do that would be ideal.



trollcatman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,919

23 Nov 2013, 11:11 am

OliveOilMom wrote:
Either way, it'll never happen. Neither side wants to lose such a powerful political motivator as abortion. [/b]


Prediction: if religiosity continues to decline, the abortion debate will move to the fringes like it has in many EU countries. One or two generations and people won't care about it anymore.



slickbacksteve
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 154

23 Nov 2013, 8:44 pm

"Maybe a chance but maybe not
Born to be thrown in the trash to rot
To exist in this world may be a mistake
The one who is with child, it's their choice to make"

and thats all ive got to say on this subject...


_________________
"Life itself is only a vision, a dream; nothing exists save empty space and you. And you are but a thought."


raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

23 Nov 2013, 9:05 pm

I think it's wrong to judge people who abort or to group them all as murderers. The idea that anyone would think that there is enjoyment to be have in abortion is sickening. Do you think the women who choose to abort enjoy it? Of course they wouldn't because it is a difficult and emotional situation for them but in the end abortion might be the only solution they have left. And to have the government force control over such a decision regardless of the situation is just not right. I think you would feel the same way if you had an aging relative on their deathbed or on life support and you had to make a decision to either let nature handle it or allow the doctors to put an end to their misery.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

23 Nov 2013, 10:29 pm

I don't have the right to tell someone what choice to make.There are too many unwanted children out there already.
It's easy to adopt out white babies,not so easy for other babies,and very few want to adopt ones with disabilities or babies born addicted to drugs.Some family friends were on the waiting list for a white baby,they got tired of waiting (for years),and adopted two beautiful black babies.They are very happy with two lovely girls.
It's tough enough to find foster parents for bigger kids,and lots of these kids have baggage so it is even harder to find adoptive parents.And group homes suck.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,205
Location: Pacific Northwest

16 Feb 2014, 2:04 am

I am against term abortions. I think terminating the fetus that far along is barbaric and I can't understand why any mother would wait that long to do it. Only time I am okay with it is if there was something wrong with the baby.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses.


DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

16 Feb 2014, 6:45 am

Moviefan2k4 wrote:
I believe the destruction of any defenseless human life equals murder.


Not yet read the rest of this thread, but I am not surprised to find near the top of page one moviefan spouting nonsense. Mr Fan are you aware that if god is so ALMIGHTY that if 'he' intervenes like you believe then,'he' is the most vile infanticidal maniac ever to infest this earth. By your estimation of 'his' powers and definition of "human life," 'he' is complicit in the murder of approximately 50% of all human babies ( I Would call them zygotes)

So before you go off pontificating at, and abusing,pregnant women who wish for whatever reason, to terminate their pregnancy, maybe you should shake you vitriolic fist at the deity you worship. Because it is a fact that nearly 50% of all pregnancies spontaneously abort before the end of the first trimester. And please do not suggest that this is because these zygotes are so holy they only need to be in human form for a few short hours or weeks. If you believe this then you also believe that your god is completely insensitive to the emotions of the relatives involved.


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,807

16 Feb 2014, 8:29 am

I think that abortion is wrong. But it's not wrong enough to override the mother's freedom to control her own body.

Something can be wrong, but not wrong enough to override a human's freedom to control their life. Everyone knows this, but some people conveniently forget it when it comes to abortion.

For example, I just killed a mosquito that was annoying me. Is that wrong? Yeah, a little bit. Should I feel bad about it? Not really.