Your second link does not appear to be to a study, but rather a peer-reviewed comment on a controversy from 1989.
Reading the abstract, it actually says
Quote:
The cornerstone of the claim that pertussis vaccine can cause permanent brain damage has always been the apparent clustering of onset of neurological disorders within the first 24-48 h after vaccination. One of the main finds of the NCES, however, which was not divulged in any published report but emerged in the course of the hearing, was that permanent brain damage did not occur within 48 h of DTP vaccination in any child in England, Scotland and Wales from mid-1976 to mid-1979 when 2 million doses of vaccine were used. The NCES, in this respect, completely undermined the evidence provided by various published case series.
In other words, that vaccination do not cause brain damage.
Your first link is to an article that was ultimately never published, but does not appear to have been retracted either... curious.
In any case, rodents and primates don't get autism. Something which causes "autism like behaviours" in an animal isn't very useful.
The weight of evidence is that vaccines don't cause autism. Vaccinated children are not more likely to have autism than unvaccinated children.