Now pro-choice

Post Reply New Topic

A tape worm isnt property either a womans body is her terretory, the baby is the tennantt and ahe can evict whoever she sees fit.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/79575 ... c-violence
http://www.policymic.com/articles/79383 ... -abortions

Here is how I see it a womans body is her own property nobody elses she is the land lord of her property the fetus is just on a 9 month lease rent free if she feels she can no longer support it she can evict it at any time.

Yes, I can, because slavery does not exist in this country, nor forced association. If I promise housing in exchange for work, then either party can decide to end the association; you're basically claiming that the landlord would have no recourse if they suddenly found out that their 'employee' was brewing meth in their bedroom. If it's a legal contract, there might be recompense owed: if someone gave me money to do something, for example, I would have to give the money back. But If I had promised to sell and then changed my mind and given back the money, they couldn't then steal it from me; if I had promised to do something and then given the money back, they couldn't then threaten me with a gun to force me to do it anyway.

I don't know how it is where you are, but sex in the US is usually pretty cheap. In fact, the less birth control you use, the cheaper it is. And, newsflash: even very, very poor people get married, and then have sex, sometimes.
If this whole contraception mandate stays in Obamacare after the SCOTUS challenge, maybe even those poor married people will be able to use birth control in the future.


Uh, you do know that CFS isn't a mental illness, right?
http://www.cdc.gov/cfs/toolkit/index.html
Also, you will never catch me saying that someone with PTSD is a 'deadbeat.' Rather, you'll see me raging at the VA for their inadequate care of veterans (who, as often as not, entered the military in the first place on the economic draft and then find themselves chewed up and spit out by the system that they thought was giving them a chance at the middle class in exchange for a brutal 4 years of training, combat, and fear, if not actual physical maiming). For that matter, I haven't ever heard anyone call someone with PTSD a 'deadbeat.'

I'm actually not entirely against that, in the first trimester. I've heard a lot of feminists speak against it, but I haven't been entirely convinced. If he makes some sort of permanent, legal disownment and breaks all ties from the woman, and pays for half of the cost of an abortion (whether she uses it for that or not), it might prevent some naive girls from thinking, 'he'll come around once he sees the kid.' It would probably increase the number of abortions, though; you ok with that?

I dont get your comparisons about landlords contracts or whatever. A contract is done between two person, agreeing each other on the contract. That includes terms for cancelling the contract.

While an baby neither did agree to an contract, nor to the terms of cancelling the contract, so the comparison to landlords contract are simply stupid.

Its a human life, and just like every child, it not an ownage to anyone, including the parents. A parent is as well not allowed to do with his kids, as he wants, as if it was an thing that belonged to him, but is forced to act in the best way for the child or riscs getting in troubles.

Beside some fanatics, the majority of people agree on each other, that the possibility of abortion should be existing. But just as much agree on each other, that ripping apart the body of an feeling human being with a working nerve system, is an horrible torture, and that doing so on purpose is an mad cruelty, which does not suddenly become otherwhise only because of that human still being in someone elses body. Thats as if someone said, that it would not be of care to other people, if they would rip apart their already vorn children, and that others should not bother about that, because of them living in their house, so they are supposed to be allowed to act with their children as they want. O_o

Beside some really outdated fanatic countries, the possibility of abortion is existing in most wester countries, and when it comes to whining about the mostly existing 12 weeks limit, then Sorry, but if doing the abortion was not that important for the mother to do until the 12th week, then its not other peoples fault for her being lazy about that. Should they should have come to her house every day 5 times and push her for caring for her own abortion, until she is finally doing it? I think a person old enough to get pregnant, is as well able to do an phone call and contact a hospital, doing that service, within twelve weeks.

It's a good thing that the vast majority of abortions don't rip apart feeling creatures, then.

wrt. a 12 week limit, lots of birth defects aren't detectable until much later; lots of pregnancy-related health problems don't show up until the 3rd trimester. And, again, you're displaying some ignorance about the poverty and lack of access to abortion providers that a lot of people face in the US.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/79885 ... -s-libidos

Dont know about your countries laws, but around here the 12 week limit is for fun abortions. If there are medical causes, then abortion can be done whenever.