Thank you, but I'm not sure about the photogenic part.
I could here launch into one of my lectures on dynamic vs static perceptions. Something like: Imaging attempts to take a dynamic, three-dimensional phenomena (a person) and portray it in static, two-dimensional media in a way that hopefully approximates how a viewer would perceive the living, breathing, moving thing in real life. And ideally that two-dimensional image would not only be perceived as visually comparable to the real thing, but would also communicate and/or elicit a corresponding emotion. Not infrequently, that is a rather tall order to place upon a cell phone camera pointed into a bathroom mirror.
But I digress. It just sometimes pains me to hear people express negative feelings about their appearance, when my professional experience has been that such is unwarranted. It is most often due to either sub-optimum photography, or a general body image dysmorphia. In the latter case there is nothing that can be done outside of psychotherapy. (Yep, I have encountered my share of those over the years.)