Page 1 of 1 [ 16 posts ]
22 Jun 2014, 3:28 pm
22 Jun 2014, 4:05 pm
22 Jun 2014, 6:40 pm
AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,663
Location: Houston, Texas
22 Jun 2014, 8:01 pm
22 Jun 2014, 8:25 pm
22 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
22 Jun 2014, 9:25 pm
I'm paying so I'd better collect when the time comes. 
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
23 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
23 Jun 2014, 10:30 am
Raptor wrote:
I'm paying so I'd better collect when the time comes.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
You're expecting to end up on disability? That aside I'd agree usually screwing with that many people as well as putting them in a position where they have nothing to lose is not very smart at all.
23 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Sweetleaf wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I'm paying so I'd better collect when the time comes.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
You're expecting to end up on disability? That aside I'd agree usually screwing with that many people as well as putting them in a position where they have nothing to lose is not very smart at all.
My bad; at a glance I thought it was about collecting retirement social security and there has been rumor about that not being available in the future. Still, thought, they shoudlnt be screwing with SSDI either.
23 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Well there goes the pool I was going to put in with my massive benefit check. 
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
23 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
Raptor wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I'm paying so I'd better collect when the time comes.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
You're expecting to end up on disability? That aside I'd agree usually screwing with that many people as well as putting them in a position where they have nothing to lose is not very smart at all.
My bad; at a glance I thought it was about collecting retirement social security and there has been rumor about that not being available in the future. Still, thought, they shoudlnt be screwing with SSDI either.
They actually probably should not screw with SSI either....why is it you think they should?
It would result in the same problems you mentioned in your post I responded to desperate people with nothing to lose.....yes not good at all.
23 Jun 2014, 2:38 pm
Sweetleaf wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I'm paying so I'd better collect when the time comes.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
If that many people have been paying and find out that they won't collect, especially if they would have to rely on it, there could be catastrophic consequences. Why? Because it's just unwise to f**k with that many people over something like that when those people will have nothing to lose.
You're expecting to end up on disability? That aside I'd agree usually screwing with that many people as well as putting them in a position where they have nothing to lose is not very smart at all.
My bad; at a glance I thought it was about collecting retirement social security and there has been rumor about that not being available in the future. Still, thought, they shouldnt be screwing with SSDI either.
They actually probably should not screw with SSI either, yet somehow I get the impression you think they should considering the bolded D you included in SSDI.
If so I am curious what you think ought to happen with people who's disability prevented them from holding employment long enough to pay into SSDI in the first place. As usual I do not expect an an actual response to that question since people who say this kind of thing never have a real response.
Duh. Why don't you go back and read what I actually said. I even went back bolded it for you. What part of "they shouldnt be screwing with SSDI either" was hard for you to comprehend?
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
23 Jun 2014, 2:51 pm
Raptor wrote:
Duh. Why don't you go back and read what I actually said. I even went back bolded it for you. What part of "they shouldnt be screwing with SSDI either" was hard for you to comprehend?
You said they should not be screwing with SSDI, looked like you where specifying SSDI as in they shouldn't screw with that but its fine if they screw with SSI....they are both Disability so with that bolded underlined D that is how it came off. Still comes off that way after going back to look... But I am assuming I misunderstood?
Nothing about they should not mess with SSDI was hard to comprehend however.
23 Jun 2014, 2:58 pm
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
23 Jun 2014, 4:33 pm
