Page 12 of 12 [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

BritAspie
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2013
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 225
Location: Peterborough, UK

07 Aug 2014, 8:48 pm

salad wrote:
Evolution is a theory. T-H-E-O-R-Y. Meaning it can be proven wrong. Meaning it's a guess. Meaning like all theories can be debunked. Yet scientists pontificate about it dogmatically as if it's absolute reality. Why won't they teach the other side? Scientists propound how science is about rationality yet consolidate the field to a select few who parrot dogma and any dissenter is stitgmaitized. There are many theories debunked and evolution isn't inerrant and infallible as to be immune to the rigor of scrutiny and modification. There's no evidence to disprove evolution not being true thus it's not true. There is no evidence that God doesn't exist thus he probably exists. There are many creationist scientists with PHDs who argue against evolution thus there is no scientific consensus regarding evolution. Plus where's the material evidence for evolution? How could a horse come from a fish? How could a bird come from a lizard, a f*****g lizard?? How?? Scientists weren't alive years ago yet act as if they're omniscient and know the past. Seriously science is constantly fluctuating as new evidence comes to light. Evolution is only as good as its time. God said evolution is false and because his word is infallible then evolution isn't true.

[Mod. edit: Please do not disrupt the page format by excessive use of spacing.]


Ok so you don't believe in evolution well how do you explain the hominid fossils that begin to look more human as time goes by until only human fossils remained and the 19th century peppered moths in London changing colour to adapt to the environment that's evolution right there with witnesses.

I've stopped listening to god when I realised that all the "stuff" he spouts about are all lies. Hail Satan



DoodleDoo
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 348
Location: SoCal/Los Angeles

08 Aug 2014, 1:49 pm

Here is a current example of evolution in action, that is the spread of beneficial mutations, in this case pig weeds. This example of genetic diversity is realized in the evolution of resistance to herbicides or weed killers.


http://deltafarmpress.com/management/mu ... ns-farmers



SilverProteus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,921
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

11 Aug 2014, 6:56 am

In science "theory" has a different meaning than its colloquial use, it's a collection of FACTS, not a hypothesis (which would be what you're confusing it with). I suggest you actually study evolutionary theory before trying to refute it, lest you make a complete fool out of yourself. It's clear you don't know much about it.



appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,506
Location: Soul Society

11 Aug 2014, 7:19 am

GGPViper wrote:
salad wrote:
Evolution is a theory. T-H-E-O-R-Y. Meaning it can be proven wrong. Meaning it's a guess. Meaning like all theories can be debunked. Yet scientists pontificate about it dogmatically as if it's absolute reality. Why won't they teach the other side? Scientists propound how science is about rationality yet consolidate the field to a select few who parrot dogma and any dissenter is stigmatized. There are many theories debunked and evolution isn't inerrant and infallible as to be immune to the rigor of scrutiny and modification.

Evolution isn't a theory, it is a fact (just as a bridge, a tree or a thunderstorm is a fact). Evolution isn't immune to the rigor of scrutiny and modification, either. It just happens to be true, though.

There are several mechanisms of evolution (like group selection, sexual selection, kin selection and reciprocal altruism) that may be considered theories on how evolution takes place, just as there are theories on how on how bridges collapse, trees grow and thunderstorms form.

salad wrote:
There's no evidence to disprove evolution not being true thus it's not true.

Please read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_lo ... experiment

salad wrote:
There is no evidence that God doesn't exist thus he probably exists.

Please read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

salad wrote:
Plus where's the material evidence for evolution?

Please read this (again):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_lo ... experiment

salad wrote:
How could a horse come from a fish? How could a bird come from a lizard, a f*****g lizard?? How??

Please read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chordata#Taxonomy

salad wrote:
Scientists weren't alive years ago yet act as if they're omniscient and know the past.

Please read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating

salad wrote:
Seriously science is constantly fluctuating as new evidence comes to light. Evolution is only as good as its time. God said evolution is false and because his word is infallible then evolution isn't true.

Image

Next.


Why do people argue with the dynamics of the world God created?
If God cared about us evolving from monkeys he wouldn't have made us that way.
Also, we need to get past arguing with the way God made us. I'm pretty sure evolution is much more impressive, even in theory, as a method to God's madness than two people and a tree.


_________________
comedic burp


appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,506
Location: Soul Society

11 Aug 2014, 7:23 am

Besides the bible isn't perfect, and it doesn't need to be. If it did, God would have made the first edition himself, with a tape recorder.


_________________
comedic burp


appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,506
Location: Soul Society

11 Aug 2014, 7:28 am

BritAspie wrote:
salad wrote:
Evolution is a theory. T-H-E-O-R-Y. Meaning it can be proven wrong. Meaning it's a guess. Meaning like all theories can be debunked. Yet scientists pontificate about it dogmatically as if it's absolute reality. Why won't they teach the other side? Scientists propound how science is about rationality yet consolidate the field to a select few who parrot dogma and any dissenter is stitgmaitized. There are many theories debunked and evolution isn't inerrant and infallible as to be immune to the rigor of scrutiny and modification. There's no evidence to disprove evolution not being true thus it's not true. There is no evidence that God doesn't exist thus he probably exists. There are many creationist scientists with PHDs who argue against evolution thus there is no scientific consensus regarding evolution. Plus where's the material evidence for evolution? How could a horse come from a fish? How could a bird come from a lizard, a f*****g lizard?? How?? Scientists weren't alive years ago yet act as if they're omniscient and know the past. Seriously science is constantly fluctuating as new evidence comes to light. Evolution is only as good as its time. God said evolution is false and because his word is infallible then evolution isn't true.

[Mod. edit: Please do not disrupt the page format by excessive use of spacing.]


Ok so you don't believe in evolution well how do you explain the hominid fossils that begin to look more human as time goes by until only human fossils remained and the 19th century peppered moths in London changing colour to adapt to the environment that's evolution right there with witnesses.

I've stopped listening to god when I realised that all the "stuff" he spouts about are all lies. Hail Satan


The only thing Satan ever did different from God was to hate humans. If humans didn't exist, Satan might still love God himself.


_________________
comedic burp


AspergianMutantt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,773
Location: North Idaho. USA

11 Aug 2014, 9:03 am

appletheclown wrote:
The only thing Satan ever did different from God was to hate humans. If humans didn't exist, Satan might still love God himself.



People now days say Satanism is more about freedom of will to pursue desires.

No,

Original Satanism is that of the followers believed god sent Satan to hell as a negative to gods positive, to scare people into following god and to punish those whom fell from gods grace, after all what does man have to fear about hell if there is no one there to punish them.. so Satan never actually fell from gods graces but instead was given a job to do. Satan was not one of hells inmates, but a governor over it. and the original devil worship symbols came out of king Solomon's greater and lesser keys (books) of knowledge that god gave him to speak to the angels above and below, the keys and symbols were not devil created but given by god, which is supportive of their arguments.


_________________
Master Thread Killer