How is atheist morality not Social Darwinism?

Page 6 of 6 [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6


User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,069
Location: Victoria, Australia

13 Aug 2014, 11:30 pm

"Maths is not a science" as is "maths is not objective" are very debatable statments. My point about evidence and experiment has to do with physics and finding invariant properties. Maths can be used to determine these invariant properties.

Being aware of your religious stance I am curious as to your agenda in declaring that maths cannot be objective. I have warning bells going off that you believe this state of affairs to mean maths cannot be used to provide objective evidence for a theory?

"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx