Rich and single vs. relationship and broke?

Page 2 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

izzeme
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665

14 Nov 2014, 3:58 am

relationship and broke for me.
i do have a desire to connect to people, and i will choose mental over physical wealth if i need to



Andreger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 525
Location: Russia - worst country ever

14 Nov 2014, 4:02 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
A rich won't stay single for too long.


Aliko Dangote, richest African is.
Jan Koum, IT billionaire also so as his business partner Brian Acton.
Alexander Lebedev, Michail Prokhorov, Michail Friedman, Alisher Usmanov - these russian billionaires are single.

And many others in fact, from rich people I found in wikipedia almost half never were married or had long relations.



Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

14 Nov 2014, 8:29 am

I'd def pick rich and single. Money equals higher security, for me and my family.

I'm asexual and as good as aromantic.

Easy peasy.


_________________
BOLTZ 17/3 2012 - 12/11 2020
Beautiful, sweet, gentle, playful, loyal
simply the best and one of a kind
love you and miss you, dear boy

Stop the wolf kills! https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeact ... 3091429765


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,214
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am

I don't see how the two are related.

Also, "rich" is relative. Once you're rich, you can more easily stay rich so I don't see how getting a relationship would make a rich person poor (unless you spend all your money on the relationship).


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,125
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in the police state called USA

14 Nov 2014, 1:46 pm

I never had a lot of money & money has never been a motivating factor for me. I have been pretty lonely when I was single so I'd defiantly pick relationship & broke.


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


Uprising
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,908

14 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm

I guess it's sort of similar to the "rich and short or poor and tall" type of questions asked about men on other forums.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

14 Nov 2014, 6:14 pm

Ugh...I don't know...

If I'd never met my wife, I'd definitely go with rich and single. Being married, though, it doesn't much matter. She takes good care of us so it's not like I really miss the money.

Back in the good old days when I was single and had a good job, it was a lot of responsibility and pressure, not to mention playing by everyone else's rules and not my own. So, yeah, I miss being in the position to accomplish a lot of good things. I don't miss being as miserable as I was.

If you're in a rock-solid relationship, you're not going to mind being broke. But you ARE going to be worried night and day whether you're doing the right thing and if you can be doing better to give your family all the opportunities they deserve. We live in a trailer, only use one vehicle, spend less than $300 a month on groceries, only go out to eat once a month, and buy flour, rice, and oats in bulk so we never have to worry about going hungry. That allows us to send our kids to a GOOD private school. I keep the 2yo so we can cut babysitting and daycare. Aside from extremely rare medical bills and student loans, we are debt-free.

We know people who have a lot more money than we do and they're constantly at the doorstep of bankruptcy.

So if you are single and rich or in a relationship and rich or not, it's entirely up to you how that enhances or detracts from your life.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Nov 2014, 6:26 pm

Andreger wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
A rich won't stay single for too long.


Aliko Dangote, richest African is.
Jan Koum, IT billionaire also so as his business partner Brian Acton.
Alexander Lebedev, Michail Prokhorov, Michail Friedman, Alisher Usmanov - these russian billionaires are single.

And many others in fact, from rich people I found in wikipedia almost half never were married or had long relations.


Wisdom bla bla ....names...yeah so what?? Are you pretending that it never occurred to you that it's their choice to be so?


Googled Alexander Lebedev and found this:
http://thecitizensoffashion.com/2013/08 ... lla-story/


and :
Quote:
Brooklyn Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov doesn't plan on getting married anytime soon.


and: the Jan Koum (whatsapp's creator no?) did have a gf.


Being voluntary single is not the same thing.

Are you telling me that no woman wants to marry those (or even attracted to, because such success bring attraction)? geez, get real.



SpirosD
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 350
Location: Europe

14 Nov 2014, 11:28 pm

Rich and single or in a relationship and broke?
I'm going to sound shallow, hell with it!! !
I'll pick being Rich and single, because when you are rich you don't stay single for long and you have the luxury of picking up who you want for a relationship, and in the mean time while you look for a relationship you can always hire an escort, even if it's all pretend.
Being in a relationship and broke will simply not work. Lots of couples, even those madly in love very often split up when money issues arrive, and it's usually on the woman's end. And then when that happens you end up being broke and singe, and then good luck into getting into another relation, no women will ever go with a man who is broke, women will always look for some sort of security in a man and that security is money, not necessary a millionaire but some money is important for them.
Based on my own experience and due to the career I've chose to pursue, I've been broke a few times in the past when I was a little younger and I can guarantee it's harder to get a date when you have no money unless you lie. And when I'm not broke and have a little money (or doing much better like today) it suddenly is much easier to end up on a date and getting into a relation and women are much more willing to it also.
Sorry for being politically incorrect on this one...


_________________
Beauty will save the world -- Fyodor Dostoevsky


AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

15 Nov 2014, 2:18 am

Id prefer rich and single because when your rich you can get in a relationshiop anytime you want because most women prefer a man whos financially stable and at the same time you are free with nobody nagging at you telling you what to do and can get as many casual relationships on a whim.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


JP88
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 187

17 Nov 2014, 4:03 pm

Probably rich and single. I just don't see myself ever getting married, having kids, etc...

Plus I've never been in a relationship before. It would probably be better for me so I could have the freedom to do whatever I want with no commitments.



CynicalWaffle
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 143

17 Nov 2014, 7:45 pm

Zeromancer won't change his/her mind in a few years. I'm 5 years older than they are, and feel that rich and single is a much better choice.

Why would you be in love and poor? Sure you'd have someone by your side, but you'd be sleeping in your car, a shelter, or some other unsavory place. Love can't save you from things that money can. I know this for a fact. Money is the single most important thing in the world besides your own health and safety.



anthropic_principle
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 300

17 Nov 2014, 7:50 pm

2nd one.. im not interested in big money anyway.
i wouldn't know what to do with it.



Orangez
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2014
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 320
Location: British Columbia

18 Nov 2014, 1:13 am

I don't even want to be rich just a enough money to do what I want without worrying about other people or society.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

18 Nov 2014, 1:29 am

There's only one out of the four things that would cause actual difficulties with survival within a society - being broke. It makes sense to choose the option that doesn't have that in it.

A lot of people seem to be responding as though the options are "Rich and single to begin with but that could change" and "relationship and poor". I was taking it as a hypothetical that you are rich and single forever, or relationship and BROKE (i.e. no money) forever. If it's meant another way I may revise my answer :)



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

19 Nov 2014, 2:41 am

If I HAD to choose between those.. rich and single.