Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Age: 70 Gender: Male Posts: 673 Location: Australia
01 Jan 2015, 9:21 pm
Any religion that would allow me to practice my real faith which is science. So if I had lived in England during the crusades, or in Papal Rome during the 16th century, I would have denounced Christianity and moved to Turkey and converted to Islam. Conversely, I would have moved back to England by the 17th century, denouncing Islam and reconverted back to Christianity.
Joined: 23 Nov 2014 Age: 61 Gender: Male Posts: 264
01 Jan 2015, 9:29 pm
progaspie wrote:
Any religion that would allow me to practice my real faith which is science. So if I had lived in England during the crusades, or in Papal Rome during the 16th century, I would have denounced Christianity and moved to Turkey and converted to Islam. Conversely, I would have moved back to England by the 17th century, denouncing Islam and reconverted back to Christianity.
Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Age: 70 Gender: Male Posts: 673 Location: Australia
01 Jan 2015, 10:06 pm
chagya wrote:
progaspie wrote:
Any religion that would allow me to practice my real faith which is science. So if I had lived in England during the crusades, or in Papal Rome during the 16th century, I would have denounced Christianity and moved to Turkey and converted to Islam. Conversely, I would have moved back to England by the 17th century, denouncing Islam and reconverted back to Christianity.
Buddhism IS science. It is not religion.
To me, it's a religion, no better or worse than any other religion.
Joined: 23 Nov 2014 Age: 61 Gender: Male Posts: 264
01 Jan 2015, 10:17 pm
progaspie wrote:
chagya wrote:
progaspie wrote:
Any religion that would allow me to practice my real faith which is science. So if I had lived in England during the crusades, or in Papal Rome during the 16th century, I would have denounced Christianity and moved to Turkey and converted to Islam. Conversely, I would have moved back to England by the 17th century, denouncing Islam and reconverted back to Christianity.
Buddhism IS science. It is not religion.
To me, it's a religion, no better or worse than any other religion.
I think a large percentage of Buddhist monks do not even consider it a religion. Monks who spend all day studying Buddhism. Most westerners who would call themselves Buddhist and call it a religion actually know very little beyond the basics of Buddhism.. Where is the worship in Buddhism? There is no God in Buddhism and what people think of as deities in Buddhism are really just representations Monks and Buddhist teachers, or Dharma teachers seldom even mention such things.
Some may not accept it as a religion, and I'm not sure if it is either, but I already do identify with humanism.
Otherwise, Buddhism for me.
"If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims." -- Dalai Lama XIV
That quote sorta explains why. It's just a more reasonable religion than the others I know of... it's more adaptable.
Ah... I just read some other replies and realized that you may have meant theistic religions...
In that case, burn me at the stake -- it's not happening. Even if I wanted to pretend to believe in a god, I wouldn't be believable because... well... I have Asperger's. It is simply impossible for me to convincingly live a lie.