Elliot Rodger
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
moderator edit: offensive material
DJKhaleedBRjan wrote:
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
You're funny, if I were a moderator, I wouldn't ban you. Having someone like you around ensures no one else could turn into you, and they wouldn't do such a good job being as entertaining (while still being useful in offering a different point of views, even one as bizarre as yours)
I am not being sarcastic, I want to keep you around just for kicks.
_________________
I want to apologize to the entire forum. I have been a terrible person, very harsh and critical.
I still hold many of my views, but I will tone down my anger and stop being so bigoted and judgmental. I can't possibly know how you see things and will stop thinking I know everything you all think.
-Johnnyh
DJKhaleedBRjan wrote:
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Isn't he also a white supremacist? I would say that clearly places him in the "unappealing" camp.
That and the fact that he murdered a bunch of people for no reason. But I'm sure you're just trolling (which by the way is against forum rules and you can get banned for that.)
_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War
(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)
wilburforce wrote:
DJKhaleedBRjan wrote:
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Isn't he also a white supremacist? I would say that clearly places him in the "unappealing" camp.
That and the fact that he murdered a bunch of people for no reason. But I'm sure you're just trolling (which by the way is against forum rules and you can get banned for that.)
No he has a point, as in while Hitler was an evil SOB, he had a much more "interesting" take on things and even did have a few good ideas (he helped Germany to produce the Volkswagon Beetle) - if he hadn't gone over to the dark side he might have been about to use his genius for good.
Elliot Rogers was just a loser who killed a bunch of people because he couldn't get laid, not an original thought in his deviant little mind.
Soulsparrer wrote:
wilburforce wrote:
DJKhaleedBRjan wrote:
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Isn't he also a white supremacist? I would say that clearly places him in the "unappealing" camp.
That and the fact that he murdered a bunch of people for no reason. But I'm sure you're just trolling (which by the way is against forum rules and you can get banned for that.)
No he has a point, as in while Hitler was an evil SOB, he had a much more "interesting" take on things and even did have a few good ideas (he helped Germany to produce the Volkswagon Beetle) - if he hadn't gone over to the dark side he might have been about to use his genius for good.
Elliot Rogers was just a loser who killed a bunch of people because he couldn't get laid, not an original thought in his deviant little mind.
But but but...Hitler had some good ideas.
Yes, the Nazis were very "interesting."
_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War
(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)
wilburforce wrote:
DJKhaleedBRjan wrote:
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Isn't he also a white supremacist? I would say that clearly places him in the "unappealing" camp.
That and the fact that he murdered a bunch of people for no reason. But I'm sure you're just trolling (which by the way is against forum rules and you can get banned for that.)
How can Elliot roger be a white supremacist when he was mixed race?
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,462
Location: Long Island, New York
xile123 wrote:
wilburforce wrote:
DJKhaleedBRjan wrote:
Elliot Rodger was a failure. He talked big in his manifesto but couldn't do s**t. He killed a bunch of nerdy kids that honestly were more likely to have been victims of the bullying he described. He couldn't have even shotup a frat house at least like he talked up in his writing. I spit on this worthless piece of s**t. My condolences to the victims and their families.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Anders Breivik is a much more successful and appealing savant.
Isn't he also a white supremacist? I would say that clearly places him in the "unappealing" camp.
That and the fact that he murdered a bunch of people for no reason. But I'm sure you're just trolling (which by the way is against forum rules and you can get banned for that.)
How can Elliot roger be a white supremacist when he was mixed race?
Internalized racism. It is not uncommon for members of minority/oppressed groups to feel thier own kind is inferior. Just read WP for awhile.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
MSBKyle wrote:
I get the rejection and feeling lonely all the time part, but I don't understand how he could be that troubled when he lived such a luxurious and privileged life.
Like someone said above, he had an entitlement problem. You'd probably find that privileged people tend to be more entitled than everyone else because they are accustomed to getting their way.